Checking out and reacting to Esquire magazineโs list of 40 must-own records. And yes โ I was yanking your crank when I used the word โvinylsโ in the thumb.
#vinyl #esquire #records
SUBSCRIBEโฆ ITโS FREE and FUN! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=MrNoNeedForAName
OFFICIAL MERCH STORE: http://channel33rpm.bigcartel.com/
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/Channel33RPM
INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/channel33rpm/
FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/Channel33RPM
Interested in sending an item to be considered for the mail time segment? Here is my address:
Frank Landry
PO BOX 99900 RE 899 513
RPO GARDEN CITY
WINNIPEG MB R2V 5A2
Canada
======================================================
ABOUT Channel33rpm: Your channel for #vinyl, gear and more, where I try to put the fun back in record collecting.
ABOUT ME: My goal is to inspire you to grow your music collection, improve your listening experience, discover new music and support artists (and have fun while doing it).
=====================================================
MUSIC CREDITS:
Pentagram by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Artist: http://audionautix.com/
Rocker Chicks by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Artist: http://audionautix.com/
Rocker by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Artist: http://audionautix.com/
======================================================
Videos shot live on location near Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
source
The list is comically awful ! Definitely , unintentionally funny ๐
Well, no.
Haha! I've been collecting music for 40+ years, and I have maybe 10 from that list, which only 1 or 2 would make my top 40! Great vid!
These list are intentionally built to generate engagement. Theyโre B.S.
The entire article is a criminal waste of trees.
Seems the article writer has a diverse taste in music as thereโs a little bit of everything on the list. But if a readerโs music taste leans toward one genre, these type of โessential albumโ lists donโt resonate for many. My music tastes lean heavily R&B/soul, so I donโt agree with many of the selections on the Esquire list, but to each his own. The few albums on this list that do have and like are Legend (Bob Marley), Purple Rain (Prince), and Kind of Blue (Miles Davis).
might be Yuppies essential list
What a joke.
This list reads like it was meant for Patrick Bateman except it's missing some representation from Huey Lewis and the News.
If everyone had the same taste in music, life would be boring. As an Aussie: Midnight Oil, Cold Chisel and INXS, maybe Divinyls and The Angels.
This is just a mess, I mean, there is a lot of nice and good records but this list is made by someone who cant much about popular music last 60 years.
When my buddies and I talk about favorite albums we don't allow compilations or soundtracks. But pretty much expected from Exquire that I place right next to Forbes in the respectability list. To be clear, pretty low.
Only one Pink Floyd album is insane!
All relative I guess, got some of them, donโt care about the others. At least itโs not as bad as a list of rock hall of fame inductees ๐
Esquire scores one point for avoiding the usual regurgitation but otherwise this makes little sense.
This list feels similar to the one about the 100 Greatest Guitar Players of all time I recently saw where Dolly Pardon was on and ruled higher than Kirk Hammett and giants like Mark Knopfler, Wes Montgomery, John Scofield, Al Di Meola were not even on but Kurt Cobain was ranked 6th best…..all these lists are useless in my opinion.
Well Frank I believe that this is more targeted to a younger population, or (if you ask me) the records aren't selling well on Amazon ๐
First time commenter, long time viewer of your videos – was compelled to comment.
(all of this typed before I read other comments, except the P.S.)
1) The article first and foremost doesn't say that the order is a ranking – however it doesn't say it isn't a ranking either. My take from looking at it is they are just listing them (for better or worse) in an arbitrary order
2) Unfortunately, there's no background info on any criteria for inclusion. So, no explanation why some entries are albums that originally came out on vinyl back in the day, but others are just "the vinyl version" of something that was released on CD. The closest they get is mentioning something about specific individual releases, like "Diana Krall's voice is made for vinyl". Otherwise, nothing about sound fidelity, bang for buck, track listings compared to other releases (that would apply more to the "hit collections"), why one would choose a collection over a specific non-collection album (and/or vice versa), etc.
Finally, the main reason I like reading articles and watching videos about "best" lists is to find out about stuff that I might not know about or may not have gotten around to checking out. Entertainment and information. Cheers.
(BTW, looking forward to any commentary you might have about the final Kiss shows in NYC, and the next phase "avatar" stuff)
P.S. So many of the comments read like "Get that record by (whoever) off of my lawn! Especially if it's a hits collection!"
Internet comments are so fascinating.
Tough room.
i think they missed a area the 80's punk a.k.a. blondie "parallel lines" , Violent Femmes (self titled), The Clash "Combat Rock". some of the new stuff they listed haven't cut there teeth long enough in my opinion to qualify as a essential best to own.
I really don't think the numbering is a ranking. They are just listing 1 – 40 as a list, not a ranking.
I found this interesting …
"there's a mix of styles and genres that are sure to make your guests feel welcome" (from the article introduction)
Just as long as your guests aren't into metal, or 70s R&B, or pretty much most of the music from the 80s, or …
(one other thing I just realized – it's trying to list 40 albums from an almost 70 year time frame relative to them having Sinatra on there with his mid-50s tunes, not to mention the Elvis, Johnny Cash and Miles picks; I would venture to say that even the most revered musicologists of the last 70 years would be challenged by that task, never mind a "commerce editor … scouring the internet for the best deals and shopping trends"; not that there's anything wrong with being a commerce editor – I mean that's fine if that's what you are)
This isn't a list it's an advertorial for Amazon
Maroon 5 over Pink Floyd ๐๐๐
tbh, I would go with that list but on SACD.
I remember years back when our local Walmart stocked up on these expensive $230 Michael Buble Christmas vinyl box sets 4 in all, but like the infamous Adel Lp, none sold.
Michael Buble has no place on any list.
You put a lot more thought into that article than the actual author did.