Space Symposium was amazing! I learned a great deal, especially about how AWESOME Starship really is!
#space #spacex #nasa
Please support my channel! EARLY VIDEO RELEASES, DISCORD MEMBERSHIP AND EXCLUSIVE CONTENT PLUS 15% OFF MERCH!
https://www.patreon.com/AngryAstronaut
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/AngryAstro
Follow me on twitter:
https://twitter.com/Astro_Angry
Please support my European Tour! A $10 donation is good for a free digital copy of my book, PLUS a ticket to my upcoming tour!!
Team Space media on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/wearetsmg
source
So wait on here then. If all these companies and industry folks are now designing much bigger station modules, and space based power systems etc, does that mean that starship is now "too big" to fail? As in if Elon ran out of money is it possible that industry would step in and keep it going since it is obvious that it is "the future" and so many are now gearing projects towards it being operational in a few years?
It's so weird. I watched a video a week or so back from a channel called the (something) Sceptic (cant remember the exact name) and that youtuber absolutely panned the whole thing, calling it a "train wreck" of a project. Said it was a stupid way of developing a launch system, a waste of money and would fail eventually. He said Elon was delusional, and that the changes to the booster and ships heights recently are just attempts to keep the delusion going, and soon industry and folks like the FAA are going to realise this snd just say "stop".
He analysed flight 3 which he deemed an utter failure because it didnt achieve its stated goals.
Surely someone will wake up and stop Elon soon because you just cant run a program this way, and Elons ego and delusions are wasting time, money and talent.
But then industry is designing flight hardware for starship, and believes unreachable programs like solar based orbital power is now possible.
How can there be such totally opposite reactions to the same program?
It all so bizarre.
Well, I'm rooting for the success of the project!
You should be very interested and supportive of the military behind space… without a strong military most of us would be trying to figure a way to get internet to our bambo hut in a village….
Much of the world leaders doesn’t like people thinking or broadcasting their views about anything…try basing your show from China or Africa or Korea……haaaa..
What? Angry LIKES Starship!?!
Meh, barely watchable. The donation callouts and animations are way too much.
I think people are misunderstanding exactly what SpaceX does primarily it builds things very rapidly very precisely. I imagine in the future SpaceX will be building many things for other companies.
You love Starship again because a bunch of European space companies got scammed by SpaceX and put all their eggs into the Springfield Monorail?
All those recent videos you made mean nothing now? Were you just in a delusional fever for a few weeks & now you've been cured with some vapourware?
Musk Rats! Form Up!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lawton okla
To me the vote is still out. Talk is cheap…proof is what counts. So we will see if Musk and Space X can deliver!
Starship seems made to heavy lift chunks of a massive earth orbit space station like the one in 2001 A Space Odyssey, shown right after Apus T. Mannus throws that bone in the air after he klubbed the other apeman gang leader to death with a pig bone.
👍🖖🏽
Once Starship is rully reusable and operational, also proven to carry payloads reliably without failure, companies around the world will basically have the shackles removed and allow them to use more imagination to design payloads that are not only physically bigger, but also heavier. Currently there is no payloads for Starship, because even if there was, there is no rocket that can support it.
Once the launch system is up and running, payloads will follow. The amount of payloads that will be available is directly propertional to the cost of launching said payload. Sure we had the shuttle that could handle large and heavy payloads. But the cost and the turn around time made it so that basically only the largest and richest companies or militaries could afford it. It could also only launch a few time per year if you factor in the entire shuttle fleet. Each shuttle was a once or twice a year job at best.
So we will see what happens, but I presume Starship will have no problem finding payloads once its fully operational, and if its not launching for someone else, or that other payload isnt a full load, you can bet SpaceX will throw some Starlink on there to make up the difference.
I like you, Angry!
Good show today, thank you Angry
Elon actually already said he wants to do nuclear propulsion, but he said it's up to the gov, he thinks it will happen, but a lot of red tape to get through, probably 5-6 years out before they give him the green light and sell him the materials. There will be tremendous oversight.
G'Day from Australia 🇦🇺 awesome podcast thank you
I'd really love to see you debunk Thunderfoot claims in his new video
This channel just begs for money in every video. Who keeps sending him all of this cash?
I'm sorry Axiom didn't do their thing… I tried 🙁
Terrible h l s design
Unless we are getting gains from the energy being sent down through the atmosphere like it is being Amplified like some zero point energy(assuming that is a actual thing), i really don't see a real viable market otherwise… easier to put solar on your roof than it is to put in space… I do recognize the beauty of constant sunlight and the ability to unfold like origami into 0 g environment making big arrays possible… i just think it needs more to really get attention.
Britain has been hijacked by insane Globalists hell bent upon its complete destruction. Here's another giant boondoggle in terms of muh "space solar" on which they are going to hurl our tax money whilst our citizens are under the heaviest tax burden since WWII.
So Elon's mega Starship factories gig is already a busted flush. If Mars colonisation is never going to happen with chemical rockets then there's no need whatsoever for thousands of Starships. Unless he converts them to nuclear of course. There is still the need for massive lifts to LEO though in order to build nuclear ships but that isn't going to take thousands of Starships.
angry. your position on starship has changed because space equipment manufacturers changed their position???😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
0:00: 🚀 Exciting updates from Space Symposium with global viewers tuning in from various time zones.
7:31: 🚀 Excitement for upcoming space convention in London focusing on solar power and hosted by Royal Aeronautical Society.
11:59: 🚀 Space industry leaning towards Starship for deploying space station modules.
16:51: 🚀 Innovative construction of nuclear interplanetary spacecraft with Starship for faster Mars travel.
21:29: 🚀 Progress on Mars ship components: nuclear thermal engine, habitation space, and propulsion.
26:42: 🚀 Advancements in nuclear propulsion and low earth orbit refueling are crucial for future space colonization.
30:34: ⚠️ European investment in space debris mitigation crucial to prevent catastrophic collisions.
Tammy AI: Get video info faster & better
I wouldn't use words easily and space in the same sentence) Otherwise, another great chat! Thanks!
Has anybody ever pointed out that the entire 3rd stage of Apollo could be fitted inside starship and launched from orbit. And yes I know it's not that simple.
Why bother building rockets, when Aliems can alter gravity?
Forget about how long it takes Starship to get to Mars and consider how long this video took to get started and how long it took thereafter to get to the point. Beating around the bush cost me data and time. You owe me.
The Angry Astronaut shares his views of orbital solar panels powering Earth. Angry informs us that there will be nuclear thermal space engine testing in three years. He also shares his opinion of humans on Mars and how we are getting there.
My opinion of orbital solar arrays is that there are less expensive ways to make electricity that need government funding. Didn’t I comment that nuclear thermal engines would be in orbit in five years, two years ago? Mars was not made for Earthlings.??
Starship is essentially THE trucking company to LEO. And maybe to Luna and Mars.
The Airbus interview was a big one. Having the vote of confidence of an organisation like that is great news.
"If you build it, they will come."
Jordan , tell SpaceX to make test landing with legs on Starship on some desert , before they try Moon landing or Mars landing .
We actually may have a new and exciting option, Cold Fusion. See the article by the Terran Space Academy on the breakthrough by researchers in Japan at CleanPlanet on there QHe Technology, "Quantum Fusion is Here!". Could we have the VASIMR in 3 years or less?
hello from the nederlands
Common Sense Skeptic
Watching from Conroe, Texas.
I was born & raised (and spent the 1st 59 Years of my life), in Pueblo, Colorado!
I pay for a youtube description (needed a way to get through long symposiums and conference videos without commercials). What's the monetization for content providers if you don't watch commercials?