Sony A7R vs A7RV– Has Image Quality ACTUALLY improved after 9 years?



MY COLOR GRADING PRESETS: http://www.manuelortizphoto.com/presets

CHECK OUT HOW I RETOUCH MY PORTRAITS: https://geni.us/Retouchingcourse

THE MANNY ORTIZ BEAUTY DISH: https://geni.us/Whitebeautydish

CAMERA GEAR
SONY A7RV: https://bhpho.to/3NfSYoc
My FAV 85mm lens: https://bhpho.to/3aQB3Rw

LIGHTING/MODIFIERS
WESTCOTT LIGHTS: https://bhpho.to/2SdQRsR
BEAUTY DISH: https://geni.us/Whitebeautydish
STRIP BOXES: https://bhpho.to/3wSwZvN
ZEPPELIN: https://bhpho.to/38nVrwE
EYELIGHTER 3: https://amzn.to/3hiHuVm
Flash trigger: https://bhpho.to/3lI3x4p
GVM LED lights: https://amzn.to/3BtoH0h

YOUTUBE SETUP
SONY FX3: https://bhpho.to/3t0iZ1V
20MM 1.8: https://bhpho.to/39UOhAt
SENNHEISER MIC: https://bhpho.to/3NCtD6K
MIC ARM: https://bhpho.to/3a2Z0IY
APUTURE 120D: https://bhpho.to/3GEXuJH
APUTURE LIGHT DOME: https://amzn.to/3MTgQwP
PAVOTUBES: https://bhpho.to/3D6DG09
CAMERA SLIDER: https://bhpho.to/3zhmunx

SOCIAL MEDIA
My Instagram: http://geni.us/Mortiz
Model- @kaylamia

source

40 thoughts on “Sony A7R vs A7RV– Has Image Quality ACTUALLY improved after 9 years?”

  1. Totally agree with the LCD screen part. I mean Sony made great tv.. etc etc.. but their camera lcd screen is still kinda bs.. even the flagship A1 has all the top matching specs but when come to screen.. its just 1.44m dots.. like come on. lol. For me.. LCD is a big thing for me because I dont shoot using evf much.. The A7RV has 2.1m dot.. slightly higher in number.. come even 2.1m dot is little compare to Nikon and Canon LCD screens.. Come on Sony.

    Reply
  2. If you want to understand the diminishing returns of sensor technology, research the diffraction limits of different censor formats in relation to lens aperture.

    I did this after studying why my photos weren't getting better with 61 mpx. It led me to adapting MF lenses on my FF camera and shooting below f/5.6.. this actually gave me the improvement I sought but it was such a pain to work with that I returned the camera.

    For professional work it might be worth the struggle… But it was way too much trouble for non paid work.

    Reply
  3. As a Canon shooter who happens to own the A7Rii, I find Sony menus cluttered and hard to comprehend. So:
    1. Did the menu system get better?
    2. What are you using to make that lightning effect in the bg?
    3. Please tell Kayla I said β€œheyyyyy”

    Reply
  4. I think that the image quality hasn't improved so much, but more the AF has made it where people become more efficient to nail focus to look sharper! I'm sure some sensors have helped and also the MP count growth has helped, but overall i think the AF and speed of cameras is what has grown more than the actual image quality!

    Reply
  5. I'd say a whole lot of people inflate wanting new tech… into NEEDING new tech ha. Much of the time, that just means someone will pick up their camera more often and have fun. I do see a lot of people get disappointed by the fact that new tech doesn't necessarily bring along new shots. Maybe that dog's eye will be stickier for the AF, but fundamentals ain't changing. I think Leica is actually a good example of this idea too. They use ancient tech and their cameras retain resale value despite being absurdly expensive to begin with. None of the yearly (quarter lol) upgrades matter much because the image quality has been top notch forever now. They capitalize on the experience and the physical quality of the camera- knowing the sensor can perform.

    Personally, I picked up an A7Rii as a second body a few weeks ago. Near mint condition with spare batteries.. $750. I shoot street and cityscape, and I'm happy to jump over to manual focus when the AF fails. The shots are astounding. I'm in NYC and the amount of detail I can pull from here now feels like a super power.

    Your production quality is insane, btw haha. This video is a feast in 4k.

    Reply
  6. Completely agree on image quality. Af acquisition, speed, tracking, and video is what has been improved. Slowly though. I think we’ve reached a ceiling on what 99.99% of folks need for a camera.

    Reply
  7. I bought the A7R2 after watching your videos back in the days. The image quality and eye AF were stunning with that camera but can't say much about the color science. It has been much improved with current gen bodies.

    Reply
  8. I think sony intentionally keeps the resolution of displays low to optimize battery efficiency. Sony cameras provide better performance in shots/battery. They have to cut corner somewhere.

    Reply
  9. Hey, Manny I respect your skill and knowledge of your craft, but you guys fail to understand that the level of innovative "perfection" you want from these cameras, i.e. L.C.D. screen, won't happen. Why? The answer is the cost and the competition. Each camera manufacturer has to decide what tweaks are most important for their cameras, while still delivering for their users and besting the competition. Yes, Sony, and the other camera manufacturers can go all out and wow you guys, but few people would want to buy it. The L.C.D. is there for you to get a "decent" look at you image. However, as a professional photographer, you should be using tethering on a high-resolution screen, if you want a mind-blowing rendition of an image taken with a high-mega pixel camera.

    Reply
  10. Those going from an a7riii to an RV will be shocked at the big bulky plasticy body of the RV. The riii feels solid but the RV has more plastic and therefore noisier when you move your thumb around going from one button to the next. I feel disappointed and feel like I went backwards. It has the same bulky plastic feel of the Nikon d500. And, it looks horrible attached to the battery grip. I should have went with a used a1 🀦

    Reply
  11. I've been following you on YouTube since your canon days in 2017. Then you made the switch to Sony and made me get the a7rii which I still have. Would you ever go APSC for video as the FX30 seems to be very capable doing what full frame cameras can and also being very consumer friendly?

    Reply
  12. Image quality is very good now. People are switching for numbers and features they don’t even use. The autofocus system was a reason to buy but now Canon and Sony have excellent AF. If you are’t getting good images today it might be the photographer.

    Reply
  13. Great Manny! It’s clear you did a lot of work and it shows! Fact-filled and lots of specs that make the comparisons relevant and easy to discern IQ differences, er, or not. Thank you for all of your wonderfully fact filled, beautifully shot vlogs, Manny. I learn something great every-time!

    Reply
  14. I've had three of these cameras and the differences would be more obvious to you if ya shot outside the studio or beyond portraits. The way in which they became more multifaceted for multimedia purposes is quite obvious put him on a gimbal or shoulder rig or shooting fashion runway, festivals nightclubs etc.

    Reply
  15. I got to ask, what do you expect? Image quality will eventually max out which I believe it already has.

    The only thing that can really improve now is the functionality on the camera camera. These will also get negated when you become more experienced in taking photos.

    But even that will have some draw backs because all the upgrades will take away the fun from photography.

    Fuji Film is the only one who i think will stand the test of time.

    And this is from a canon user.

    Reply
  16. I'll take it a step further. It's very hard to see the difference between the images from a phone and those cameras. It's that close now. The phones are amazing at processing sharpness and contrast with 1 press of a button. And guess what, you can get great images with a low end $200 phone like a Samsung A52 or Pixel 5. It's light with great battery life plus you can zoom.

    Reply
  17. I’m afraid this technology is making photography more sterile.
    Think about the techniques they were using 40 years ago. It’s not the same.
    But one thing technology will never do for you is composition and good lighting

    Reply
  18. In terms of the high res cameras by Sony, you need the first one with proper, accurate AF. That is the R III. Nowadays the price of that is very good. If photography is what you do predominantly – just go with that and invest the difference in upgrading the lens(es).

    Reply

Leave a Comment