Scientists Confirm Native Americans Have Aboriginal Australian Ancestry



Forget everything you thought you knew about The peopling of the Americas. According to these ideas, the genetic group known as Australo-Melanesians, which consists of Australians, Papuans, and Melanesians, is subtly present in the Americas. When and how it came in the New World, often known as the Americas, is a significant difference. The scientific team came to the conclusion that it entered the continent in one of two early waves of migration, whereas the science team came to the conclusion that it entered the continent much later and was unrelated to the founding population of the Americas.

The last big frontier to be colonized by humanity is still one of the great puzzles of human history. The big questions about the early settlers—who they were, when they arrived, and how many waves there were—are being addressed by two significant studies of the DNA of modern and ancient people. But rather than producing a single, unified theory, the results raise a fresh mystery: Both find evidence of DNA related to native people from Australia and Melanesia in contemporary Native Americans. The opposing teams are still attempting to reconcile and make sense of each other’s data because they were unaware of one another’s plans until the very last minute.

source

26 thoughts on “Scientists Confirm Native Americans Have Aboriginal Australian Ancestry”

  1. With the Yonger Dryas impacts all over N. America at 12.8K years ago, I'd assume those natives with the "Y" marker are missing from the record because they were destroyed, leaving only a trace in S. America who survived. Also, when examining bathymetric maps of the Pacific, it's pretty obvious there are thousands of submerged islands that once existed above sea level during the Ice Ages, therefore it's easier to visualize Oceania populations coming to Central and S. America (which also aligns with some of their myths).

    Reply
  2. The Maori and pacific Islanders have a plant the sweet potato which is native to south America and they also share south American DNA so they obviously travelled there to get the plant. They have oral stories about it if u look hard enough

    Reply
  3. Follow the coasts then migrate up the rivers.
    The first crossing couldn't be a foot crossing. My bet is skin boats hunting coastal sea mammals, salmon, and sea birds, shore nesting birds. The life would be relatively simple, and probably highly mobile. Probably setting up permanent camps at river mouths and bays that provide easy fishing. Descendents would slowly migrate upriver and adapt to more terrestrial hunting.
    At some point, probably at the Levant, there was a population bottleneck of h sapiens.

    Reply
  4. The Australia Aboriginals r not Afro. Their ancient DNA places them in Asia/Polynesia/Oceana. They identity as Afro and they have the right to identify with whoever they want, but it doesn't change their genetics. It's not surprising that there is shared DNA, we all came from Asia, the majority of Native Americans came from Eurasia. There is a handful of people with Australia Aboriginals specifically in the Amazon, but it's pretty obvious thru DNA, where we all came from, Asia! It's not surprising that the Aboriginals from Australia stopped in the Americas, maybe they stayed for days, months, yrs, who knows. Anyone that doesn't accept it or doesn't like it, should take their argument to science and genologists, they disagree with you.

    Reply
  5. A very small sampling. While it proves people with heritage from Oceana are among the indigenous, it doesn’t prove their theories of how it got there. Or when. Oldest sample is under 15,000 years ago. There are a few sites in North and South America that are currently dated over 20,000 years old. One in Chili dated 21,000 years old. Unfortunately a skull dated about 30,000 years old was destroyed when the Brazilian museum it was in went up in flames sometime in the last decade. I do not know if they tried to get DNA from it before that. If I remember correctly they name it “Lucia”.
    I tend to root for the idea that people from Oceana got to the Americas by a more direct route. Maybe not before 15,000 years ago, but that doesn’t really matter. If they can theorize that a sweet potato from the Americas could survive floating in salt water for months to get to Oceana, why couldn’t people who got as far as Easter Island and New Zealand get to South America.
    Then there are the Olmec heads. They look exactly like various ethnicities in Oceana.

    Reply
  6. Genetic biologists devote their careers to solve questions about ancient migration routes and what 250 centuries of human interaction results in. The benefits in medicine may be of use but speculation about origins can be a propaganda hammer used by racists. Just putting it out there.🤔

    Reply
  7. I think white people are the aliens to Mother Earth. Your science says what it says so you can feel alright about stealing lands. People come from the Lands you found them in. Like the Koala is to Australia, the Panda is to China, the Zebra is to Africa, and Bison are to North America, as Polar Bears are to Northern Lands.. the people belong to the land, and the land births the environment. It all works together regardless of what your very fake, biased, bigoted reports say.

    Reply

Leave a Comment