Scientists At Grand Canyon Just Announced A TERRIFYING New Discovery!



For copyright contact: stienlemane2379(at)gmail.com

Welcome to Futureunity, where we explore the fascinating world of science, technology, and the universe! From the inner workings of the human body to the outer reaches of space, we delve into the latest and most interesting discoveries that are shaping our world. Whether you’re a science buff or just looking for some mind-blowing facts, we’ve got you covered. Join us as we uncover the mysteries of the world around us and discover new frontiers in the fields of science and technology. Get ready for a journey that’s both educational and entertaining!

Disclaimer Fair Use:
1. The videos have no negative impact on the original works.
2. The videos we make are used for educational purposes.
3. The videos are transformative in nature.
4. We use only the audio component and tiny pieces of video footage, only if it’s necessary.
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing.

Disclaimer:
Our channel is based on facts, rumors & fiction.

source

26 thoughts on “Scientists At Grand Canyon Just Announced A TERRIFYING New Discovery!”

  1. The thing about science is its mostly theory and will never be perfect or owned by anyone not even the people telling you that they do. Carbon dating is far from perfect and usually never right.

    Reply
  2. Its actually drying up cause people in the early 1900s didnt know how to do math. They disregarded science for money. When they first started regulating the water they estimated 25 million gallons run through it yearly but it was more like 15. They promised water to places they didnt have.

    Reply
  3. Yeah bigfoot and wolfman and all them could live there after a genetically made him I don't know about the bigfoot but that wolf man somebody made that guy cause hes a big guy what they're talking about here

    Reply
  4. The missing rocks of the Grand canyon are the parts of( canyon formed ) FOREIGN land and other land in the oceans (island of Land on Rock pushed from great flood ) your missing rocks and dirt moved to form other Islands around globe 🌎…

    Reply
  5. On some topics, the Bible is extremely clear. For example, our moral obligations toward God and the method of salvation are discussed in detail. On other topics, however, the Bible doesn’t provide nearly as much information. Reading the Scriptures carefully, one finds that the more critical a topic is, the more directly the Bible addresses it. In other words, “the main things are the plain things.” One of the topics not explicitly addressed in Scripture is the age of the earth.

    There are several ways of attempting to determine the age of the earth. Every method relies on certain assumptions which may or may not be accurate. All fall in a spectrum between biblical literalism and scientific literalism.

    One method of determining the age of the earth assumes that the six days of creation presented in Genesis 1 were literal 24-hour periods and that there are no gaps in the chronology or genealogy of Genesis. The years listed in the genealogies of Genesis are then added to get an approximate time from creation to certain Old Testament figures. Using this method, we arrive at an age for Earth of approximately 6,000 years. It’s important to realize that the Bible nowhere explicitly states the age of the earth—this is a calculated number.

    Another method of determining the age of the earth is to use resources such as radiometric (carbon) dating, geologic cycles, and so forth. By comparing different methods, and seeing if they align, scientists attempt to determine how old the planet is. This is the method used to arrive at an age for Earth of about 4 to 5 billion years. It’s important to realize that there is no means to directly measure the age of the earth—this is a calculated number.

    Both of these methods of determining the age of the earth have potential drawbacks. There are theologians who do not believe that the Bible’s text requires the creation days to be literal 24-hour periods. Likewise, there are reasons to believe that the genealogies of Genesis have intentional gaps, only mentioning certain men in the lineage. Some measures of the age of Earth do not seem to support it being as young as 6,000 years, and denying such evidence requires the suggestion that God made virtually every aspect of the universe “appear” to be old, for some reason. Despite claims to the contrary, many Christians who hold to an old earth view take the Bible to be infallible and inspired, but they differ on the proper interpretation of a select few verses.

    On the other hand, radiometric dating is only useful or accurate back to a certain point, far less than the scale involved in dating the earth. Geologic time scales, fossil records, and so forth are highly dependent on assumptions and subject to modeling errors. The same is true of observations of the greater universe; we can only see a tiny fraction of all that exists, and much of what we “know” is theoretical. In short, there are ample reasons to believe that secular estimates for the age of the earth are inaccurate, as well. Relying on science to answer scientific questions is fine, but science cannot be treated as infallible.

    In the end, the chronological age of the earth cannot be proven. Unfortunately, there are voices on both sides of the issue who claim theirs is the only possible interpretation—theologically or scientifically. In truth, there is no irreconcilable theological contradiction between Christianity and an old earth. Nor is there a true scientific contradiction in a young earth. Those who claim otherwise are creating division where none needs exist. Whichever view a person holds, what matters is whether or not he is trusting in God’s Word to be true and authoritative.

    I believe that Genesis 1–2 is literal, and young earth creationism is what a literal reading of those chapters presents. At the same time, we do not consider old earth creationism to be heretical. We need not question the faith of our brothers and sisters in Christ who disagree with us about the age of the earth. We believe one can hold to old earth creationism and still adhere to the core doctrines of the Christian faith.

    Topics such as the age of the earth are why Paul urged believers not to cause strife over things not detailed in the Bible (Romans 14:1–10; Titus 3:9). The age of the earth is not “plain” in the Scriptures. It is also not “main,” in that one’s view of Earth’s age has no necessary implications for one’s view of sin, salvation, morality, heaven, or hell. We can know much about who created, why He created, and how we are meant to relate to Him, but the Bible does not tell us in unambiguous terms exactly when He created.

    Reply
  6. America was discovered by Africans that’s probably how, the Chinese, and the Native Americans too and like every other country, discovered America before England.😅😅😅😅 and also would explain why it was hidden, the government back then and scientists were racist and found out that the Egyptians and other cultures have been there before them. Which pretty pissed them off. So they hid the truth for years, mainly out of racism. But it’s stupid to keep it hidden now when the government is not racist anymore. so basically archaeologists can look at it now, because it seems the government is wasting resources to protecting an ancient temple with boatloads of history, that is missing since the Grand Canyon has a lot of history that is missing ancient temple would make sense if I used to be there until the earthquakes happen in killed most of them. And Giants and normal people were coexisting, like there’s so much rich history there yet the government wants to hide that because of what happened 100 years ago. I want to know what’s in there like there’s a History missing and the government fears the past which is not really a threat because the people in there already dead.

    Reply
  7. I could the Egyptian’s getting there first because they were very very smart, like they already knew about electricity try to make a pyramid generator, but it blew up so they didn’t use it, so I could see them getting to America first, because they were definitely smarter than other cultures. If they can figure out how electricity works to some degree. we can make a giant boat to get to America.

    Reply
  8. Keep in mind, the government was racist back then and so were scientist keep in mind, the Egyptian’s discovered America before England, they just found out a bunch of N words, discovered America before they did. so they hid the truth to protect their history even though the Native Americans got their first, the Vikings, the Africans, and the Chinese and other countries.😮😮😮😮

    Reply
  9. If sloths exist in America, that would explain the Bigfoot because they used to be giant sloths, and big foot is a giant ape that is native to America, now I could’ve evolved into a big foot.

    Reply
  10. Because it would explain the myth about Bigfoot. If it was a giant sloth, that would explain why no one can find them since they hide in the tree or around the tree, it could be a species that is native to America and evolved into Bigfoot.

    Reply
  11. 800 year old settlement. I lived in a 650 year old house/pub until I was 21 with my family. The historic timeline to what we the UK consider as ancient in comparison to the USA is so different

    Reply

Leave a Comment