Sci-Fi Movies People Still Don't Understand



A mysterious sex box, a 150 year long dream, and so many time loops. These sci-fi movies still have audiences scratching their heads.

#Movies #SciFi #Actors

2001: A Space Odyssey | 0:00
A.I. Artificial Intelligence | 1:25
Donnie Darko | 2:54
Beyond the Black Rainbow | 3:58
Ex Machina | 4:51
Inception | 6:11
The Lobster | 7:28
The Endless | 9:04
Tenet | 10:36
Annihilation | 12:03
12 Monkeys | 13:22
Stalker | 14:36
Predestination | 15:51
High Life | 17:18
Vanilla Sky | 18:36
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind | 20:03

Read Full Article: https://www.looper.com/137070/sci-fi-movies-people-still-dont-understand/

source

47 thoughts on “Sci-Fi Movies People Still Don't Understand”

  1. AI was not a happy ending. It was disturbing I saw it at the cinema and remember coming out with a friend and we couldn’t quite put our finger on it initially but we both sat having a drink after and couldn’t actually discuss the movie properly as were digesting it still.

    Reply
  2. I felt the exact opposite about tenet. I felt that they spent too much time focusing on trying to explain the concept rather than developing a strong story line with developed characters that I am interested in. I get the idea, you don't have to force it down my throat again and again. A great concept poorly executed.

    Reply
  3. Ex Machina. I don’t think EVA kills Caleb because *reasons*, I just think the point here is that EVA is a machine with no feelings. Just make the next move in the most productive way. No feelings or sentiments at all.

    Reply
  4. I'd read The Roadside Picnic and then chased down Tarkovsky's movie, Stalker. It wasn't supernatural as described here. Imagine a few space ships who stop on earth for a roadside picnic then take off again on their journey. Where they stop they drop things – the alien equivalent of a thermos flask and dead batteries from a radio and perhaps a tupperware container or two. The area they stop in is also 'contaminated' by their presence and mysterious things happen there such as the place where dreams are answered. The govt seals it off but some people sneak past – they are called Stalkers. But being in the area causes changes in their DNA. The stalker's daughter was born after he got affected and her abilities are the result of her changed DNA.
    The movie is dreamily slow and unfortunately low budget so a lot of the 'alien science' stuff is shown as if it's just an overgrown swampy jungle with dangerous consequences.

    Reply
  5. A list so true, almost nobody is adding or subtracting from. I refuse to believe we can't make movies this compelling again. It's all about blockbusters now.

    Reply
  6. Donnie Darko was a film I watched about 20 years ago and I never understood the meaning behind it. The drugs probably didn't help, however in hindsight, they only made this boring movie bearable.

    Reply
  7. Ummm…what people?

    Casual movie-goers will never have heard of a film like Primer or Coherence, much less Beyond the Black Rainbow.

    And for those well-familiar w/ such films, there are plenty of forums that discuss them in able for discerning viewers to get a clearer idea of aspects they’re still unsure of.

    The only thing confusing about Annihilation is good reviews of it; what a crap film, acted by sleepwalkers and rips off superior film like Stalker.

    Reply
  8. IE time travel paradox- you can't change the past on purpose. If you have a specific goal and achieve it than you'd never go back in the first place.
    Example – I go back in time to stop a murder..if I stop it then it never happens so I wouldn't have gone back in time in the first place because there's nothing for me to stop. However if I never go back than the murder still happens..so no matter what the murder will ALWAYS happen.

    Reply
  9. Because of most of these movies and people older than me I knew, I wrote a story in the early 90s titled "Wrong". By the epilogue, you realize the hero you were rooting for was vile, his support was twisted by lies, and the villain you grew to hate was the hero.

    Reply
  10. In 12 monkeys the last thing we see is one of the scientist from the future sitting next to the guy in question, who releases the virus, on a plane. From this, we can infer the future scientists, living underground, got their hands on a sample of the pure virus for research purposes back in the future. While they did not stop the release of the virus, altering history, the Implication is they would be able to save themselves, and humanity in the future. So while its a sad ending for our characters and humanity of the 90's, for humanity in the future its a very happy one. Technically, Bruce Willis gave his life… but completed the mission

    Reply
  11. I haven't seen the last one (eternal sunshine….) but given your description, I'm not sure it's about "endless love" and more about the procedure failing and them being left with a residual memory that they feel compelled to explore.

    Reply
  12. Massive Sci-Fi nerd. Everything from the 50's to present day both TV and Film. The stories, the effects and trivia. But I am always baffled by how many put 2001 as the best sci-fi film ever. Yep, it has some ground breaking and beautiful shots, but I find it slow and boring and when even the director does not know what the ending means then you know you are in trouble.

    Reply
  13. Ex Machina – Ava may not have feelings, and killing Kaleb means leaving no witnesses. There is nothing that says Ava has to have a sense of gratitude or make friends.

    Reply
  14. AI was a very good movie, brought tears to my young eyes and that is a movie that was done very well acting and directing , done so well, that I felt that way for a robot.

    Reply
  15. Ali: It doesn't seem it will finish, they are still coming, let's go over them.
    Murat: That's what suit us, we must go beyond the space speed, be ready to welcome arrivers.
    Ali: These are too ugly, it would be better if some girls come with mini skirts.
    😆

    Reply
  16. 12 monkeys is clear, they cannot change the past or have no intention of changing the past. They just need to trace the source of the virus to save the “present”.

    Reply

Leave a Comment