San Francisco police using drones to follow, arrest suspects



Drones are the new eyes in the sky that San Francisco police officers are using to make arrests. Chief Scott says drones have already assisted the department in a number of criminal cases. https://abc7ne.ws/3SFeI0z

#drone #police #sfpd #news #abc7news

source

40 thoughts on “San Francisco police using drones to follow, arrest suspects”

  1. Many big cities in China are safe for tourists, women and elderly people to walk at night because cameras are everywhere and the police can access them in real time. No one dares to commit crime there.

    Reply
  2. I agree with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. How can you be sure the police will delete videos after 30 days? And drones are not quiet. A surveillance society where you will be caught on camera even in your backyard or camping, and tracked, if they feel you are an undesirable, or non-yuppie. Too much power in the hands of a few.

    Reply
  3. Mayor puts more spin on the facts than those old magazines that used be at every grocery store checkout lines. With titles like Micheal Jackson molested by aliens. Umm that one might have to much truth to it, so that probably isnโ€™t the best example.

    Reply
  4. lol itโ€™s like the movies of the future where crime is out of control and the government watches your every move.
    The drones are watching the criminals and law abiding citizens.
    lol
    Proving democrats are the true fascists .

    Reply
  5. They are doing it to get the criminals out on the streets faster. Criminals complained about the aresst, booking and release wothout bail can take as long as an hour.
    Democrats are also considering giving criminals free drones so they can track the police and avoid the inconvenience of an aresst.

    Reply
  6. They are not releasing policy info because this falls under " UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURE LAW" This is government overreaching in plane site.The same way they are violating the second amendment little by little over time.

    Reply
  7. And what is the problem? Use any technology that can help effect arrest. Also, increase the penalty for crimes. The DA said that a person was a repeat offender, so this arrest and conviction should be minimum of 30 years. What happened to 3 strikes? They need to get the right people involved who understand crime and criminals. Defense attorney minded people will never accept any reasonable consequences.

    Reply
  8. Nos alegra ver noticias como estas donde el uso del drone es uno de mucho provecho. Si quieren aprender en espaรฑol, certificarse y convertirse en pilotos de drones profesionales aqui tienen una casa!

    Reply

Leave a Comment