Rolling Stone’s Alan Sepinwall & Rich Eisen Debate the ‘Succession’ Series Finale **SPOILER ALERT**



***SPOILER ALERT*** Rolling Stone Chief TV Critic Alan Sepinwall and Rich Eisen debate the merits of the series finale of ‘Succession.’

Tune in to the Emmy-nominated Rich Eisen Show live for FREE on The Roku Channel at https://go.roku.com/thericheisenshow and also streaming on Audacy, Sirius channel 218 and XM channel 202 weekdays from 12-3 PM ET!

Showcasing insightful sports expertise with an offbeat mix of humor and pop culture, The Rich Eisen Show attracts the most recognizable names in sports and entertainment.

Subscribe here to keep up with the internet’s best sports and pop culture commentary, interviews, and much more: https://bit.ly/2VjWSBC

FOLLOW US HERE:
https://www.instagram.com/richeisenshow/ https://www.twitter.com/RichEisenShow
https://www.facebook.com/RichEisenShow
https://www.tiktok.com/@thericheisenshow
https://www.audacy.com/richeisen/listen

#richeisenshow #successionhbo #succesion

source

22 thoughts on “Rolling Stone’s Alan Sepinwall & Rich Eisen Debate the ‘Succession’ Series Finale **SPOILER ALERT**”

  1. I think Shiv made the choice the gave her the most power. Tom as CEO is like McCarthy as speaker – no real power – and even before the payout from GoJo, her prenup-protected wealth is about 1000 times greater that Tom's so she'll have almost daily opportunities to "shiv" anybody and everybody. Plus the whole point is that she, like the others has been irreparably broken by her NotBestDadEver so it's totally in-character for her to betray Kendall.

    Reply
  2. Completely disagree with Rich here, that was ABSOLUTELY who Shiv was. She couldn't stand to see a Roy that wasn't her sit atop the throne and while she ultimately loses and becomes a part of Tom's shadow, she will have forever taken that away from Ken and will always sit closer to the top than he will. Something that he was promised at 7 years old

    Reply
  3. Shiv would negociate what ?! She wanted to be CEO. So she's supposed to say Ken I'll vote for you if you make me CEO ? Make that make sense. Also she was publicly for Mattson so the board would not have backed her. It was Ken or Mattson. That's it. With Mattson her husband and father of her baby is CEO. Better for her.

    Reply
  4. Shiv had no cards to play at the end, she wasn’t going to get the CEO position. It wasn’t about her morals, she had none. She couldn’t stand to see Kendall win and opted to blow it up. Plus this notion that Kendall was going to ruin the company is completely false. In fact, this season he more than displayed he was up to the task. Was he going to be the next Logan Roy? I’m not sure, but that might have not been a bad thing.

    Reply
  5. Overall, the show demonstrated the crucial differences in dynamics when you compare holding onto something you've created versus acquiring something you think you are entitled to. It's at the heart of Roman's observation that 'we're all bullshit,' in tandem with Logan's observation 'I love you all, but you're not serious people.' The Roy siblings were trying to leverage their family dysfunction against strangers with actual and real ambitions for the things Logan built, and their dysfunction and their lack of preparation for the actual dynamics of the battle resulted in mutual seppuku.

    Reply
  6. Rich is incorrect.
    – Shiv wanted the company sold in the first place
    – Shiv despises her brothers, especially Kendall
    – Shiv has beef with Matssen

    The only thing that she kind of still wants (for now), is Tom.. kinda. The way to win that part of her life, was to vote against her brother(s), which is basically a vote for Tom.

    Reply
  7. BS. If Kendall is a terrible CEO, the board could always replace him. Especially with Shiv and Roman having board seats.

    If that election litigation swings Jimenez's way, Tom is the face of ATN news that called it for Mencken. And open to lawsuits themselves. Tom could easily be fired

    Reply

Leave a Comment