Geological Survey of Finland Professor Simon Michaux says replacing vehicles on the road with electrical and hydrogen fuel cell cars is “talking billions” in costs.
“It depends on are we going to replace the existing system or not if we were, there is 1.4 billion vehicles estimated in the 2018 vehicle fleet,” Mr Michaux told Sky News host Chris Kenny.
“If we were to replace all them … we’re talking billions, certainly hundreds of millions.”
source
Totally impossible!!
This will be more dangerous for the environment !
Also no one can think of what to do with all the waste from solar panels ( they will be the new plastic pollution )
Should diesel become unavailable, it's time to make ones own. Biodiesel is easy to make…
Corrupt politicians and their money laundering schemes
We will all be riding bicycles .
🤮🤮
Finland has got it right with nuclear power
the Woke dont like science, They live in la la land.
And then ev's are just toxic waste when their short life is over
It's a green pipe dream!
The 'Green Goblin Agenda' doing what it intends to do for those greedy global capitalist investors bank balance $$$$$$£££££££ ……..and the idiots who push a political ideology upon the masses to further their career agendas ….look up ULEZ in London UK being pushed to expansion so the tyrannical mayor , sadiq khan, gets another term in office…….I blame the governments who 'listened' to Greta and those who exploit her.
Trillions at least, assuming it works, which it doesn't. Of course Kenny the voice shill is wrong as usual.
Will just remind you chris that Snowy 2.0 was a project of the Liberal Party. SKY relies on the ignorance of its audience to get away with blaming Labor for a Liberal project. The idea is to pile on endless negative stories about the Labor Party., whether they are true or not.
The "Reds" pushing their Green Scam! Have you been Scammed today?
Humans produce 3.5% of the Carbon Dioxide.
Australia Produces 1.6% of that total of 3.5%! So what %%age is that in the total Carbon Dioxide which is produced!? Where can you measure a number that small? in a lab!
Professor, professor, professor hardly ever heard the terminology until March 2020 and then they all started coming out of the woodwork.
Well you'll "own nothing and be happy" so less personal transport is the push and the wealthy will have them.
And the left bitch about the debt xD
yeah, EV's are so exciting to me!!! I have seen a few around. it seems to me, EV's are for people who never travel more than 200 miles on a trip, or vacation in the family car (remember: you can't keep a $5 can of electricity in the boot of your car)! the resale value is next to NOTHING for thinking people (kinda like buying a yacht and pouring money into it year after year, and finding after the batteries have run down, IT HAS NO RESALE VALUE)!!! there is an 'Ol saying about boats: 'a boat is a hole in the lake, that you throw money in'. and get this! when the outdoor temperature falls below 20 degrees Fahrenheit, it loses 40% of its efficiency! in other words, the 214 miles you were able to drive before a 'fill up' or 'recharge', becomes 'a tick' over 100 miles distance! yeah, EV's seem only practical for those who are able to purchase a car EVERY 5 years, with no 'trade in' value.
Have you got one of those "Green" caps on your tires valve stems? I have seen other colours which are probably same?
So how much Nitrogen is in the air? number is ????
So does adding 30% more make it ride better???
Eweou bought it! You were sold on an idea to accomplish what?? Liberate your money from YOUR Pocket! Good on Eweou?????
Anyone that thinks EV's will save the environment is a gullible ignorant fool. Their giant toxic batteries are not environmentally friendly, especially when they burn.
Yeah trillions they already have from fleecing us lot 😠😠
Remove all subsidies from renewables and electric vehicles and remove tax on petrol and let the market and consumers decide everything.
All of this bullshit to get rid of carbon dioxide so that we can't grow food.
But LNP started and budgeted on that project. Now Bowen's got to clean up the mess. 2050 a long way off, when $12 billion a year from taxpayers purse goes into fossil fuels. At least the miners will have more work, there is your employment opportunity.
No problem. There will be enough minerals for Klaus Schwab's and Bill Gates entourage. If you think the rest of us are going to have cars I think you are a little too optimistic.
Capitalism will drive the market to EVs, whether we like it or not. The same capitalism that Chris Kenny defends so often, the irony.
Or again rely on China which makes most of the EV's or green energy in general.
Just have a look at Vanderstock v State of Victoria in the High Court. Victoria (and all the other states) want to charge EV drivers a “per kilometre” charge for using the roads. Now, act surprised.
When governments mandate things, it can’t have a good outcome.
We all gona go back to walkin
The lack and astronomical cost of the required mined minerals makes net zero carbon impossible. Hundreds of new mines would be needed which would cost trillions, not billions, and due to much lower mined mineral yields, the cost of these minerals would be 2 or 3 times more.
hydrogen cars are rubbish and wont sell for many reasons.
also please stop crying about EVs.
they are coming because they are better and people want them.
once you accept that maybe then you can stop spreading your BS but i doubt it.
This Just Tells Me The Masses WILL NOT Be Driving BUT WALKING
Dont play their games… I am keeping my petrol cars
They are not electric or hydrogen vehicles they are coal powered the hydrogen or battery is only power storage
Electric or hydrogen cars are Less efficient than petrol with more emissions and environmental impact
BATTERYS ONLY STORE ENERGY FROM THE COAL POWER STATION, WITH MORE LOSS THAN PETROL
Net zero is truly scams and makes people paying more for various EP products. E.g. when politicians debates and farts in parliament are already emitting carbon and methane. How can it be zero?!
Ask any electrical engineer about Electric Vehicles and the power demands of charging them!! Their answer is universal.. we do not have the electrical power requirements to do it!! Worse.. as the person said above.. how do we get all the raw metals, minerals and chemicals?? If it is not clear there will be the rich upper class who have an EV and the rest of us will be locked in 15 Minute Cities where we will use pushbikes or be made to walk!! I also foresee a time where we are made to go parts of our day with the power grids turned off while the same rich upper class will go without nothing!! Often our science fiction because science fact and look at a movie called Elysium.. that is the class system we can expect from the 'haves' and 'have-nots' in a very short time frame.. but that is the expectation with 'the great reset' and 'you will own nothing and you will be happy' but also with 'forced euthanasia of the elderly or defective' which is being looked at as I type this in many Asian Countries!! If we are to accomplish any of what we have been told we need to do by 2045-2050 we need a new and much cleaner form of powering our society and world for all to gain from and not just a certain class!!
compare China's CO2 with Australia's then ask Bowen and Bandt the question why are they in any hurrry at such great cost when there are affordable housing shortages across Australia which is surely more important to socialists than making billlonairs out of climate change fanaticsm
CO2 is sustenance for 90% of all life on this planet. The waste products of green energy kills anything it touches. Once enough old batteries are 'disposed of' there will be no water safe to drink.
The countries causing the most pollution are 2nd and 3rd world countries, do you really think they give a shit? No, because they're poor. Australia doesn't need this greeny pushing BS.
LOL… EV is not really green
Follow the money
Hydrogen makes more sense.