Today’s video was inspired by a very interesting comment I received yesterday.
#nephilim #demigods
Links:
Reversing hermon (affiliate link) – https://amzn.to/3Tqjtux
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procrustes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minos
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%206:1-4&version=ESV
https://biblehub.com/numbers/13-33.htm
Become a member of my channel! – https://www.youtube.com/@shellysangrey/membership
Follow me on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/theres_noplacelike_home/
Related Videos:
Question the Narrative Playlist – https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnErNSbv3VcaM5mA6HsPN99qEC9oGp7c_
PayPal – paypal.me/SSangrey
Blog- https://redheadmom8.wordpress.com/
Instagram- https://www.instagram.com/theres_noplacelike_home/
Twitter- @redheadmom8
Email – [email protected]
source
I would answer the question this way: There must be a pure bloodline from Adam up through Christ in order to fulfill the Genesis 3:15 prophecy of the serpent’s progeny vs. Eve’s. There’s a reason all the genealogies are in place, to prove Jesus’ pedigree. Jesus is of the pure blood line of Mary and the seed of God almighty. Anything else, namely indirect fallen angel parentage is under-informed at best and rank heresy at worst.
“In the NT, Jesus, who was Born unto Mary, is described as BOTH "a son of God" and "a son of man". The definition of a Nephilim is, "the offspring of the son's of God and daughters of men" so, isn't it possible that Jesus could be one of them?”
The logic here doesn’t work because there is a huge difference between a “son of God” and “offspring of the sons of God.” Even Adam was a “son of God” (Luke 3:38.) A son of God is one created by God. Men were blessed to procreate, angels were not. They went outside of what was natural, blessed and righteous to do what they did: having “children” (kids actually) or offspring.
The angels who sinned are envious of God and want to be worshipped, something that is actually as ridiculous and inappropriate as men and women wanting worship. A “son of God” is not the same as God, it’s a completely different thing. So comparing Jesus’ conception being caused by God to angels leaving their “proper dwelling place” (Jude 1:6) and taking human “wives” doesn’t pan out. The Creator alone has the right to do as he wishes with His creation and will always act in a holy, clean and righteous way. They had no right to do what they did and what they did was obscene. We are familiar with the idea that sex can be sacred OR it can be obscene.
Comparable to the difference between a husband and wife making love, and bestiality, prostitution, rape or child abuse.
Nephilim were a Satanic twisted, blasphemous, obscene mockery of what the Creator had in mind to do in setting things right. As usual, the angels who sinned trying to usurp and steal something that didn’t belong to them, while placing their abominations where they have no business being.
Please confirm this for yourself with your own eyes:
I understand that this is controversial, so please try to approach this with logic, discernment and critical thinking. Be aware of the conditioning and programming triggering emotions that make it hard to think and put them aside for a moment while you consider the facts.
Compare using Greek interlinear:
John 1:1
2 Corinthians 4:4
(Google “John 1:1 interlinear” and “2 Corinthians 4:4 interlinear.”)
The original Greek word translated “God” at the end of John 1:1 is the EXACT same word translated “god” at the beginning of 2 Corinthians 4:4.
You will find that the word is Θεός, transliterated “theós.”
Thayer's:
“1. a god or goddess, a general name of deities or divinities
2. the Godhead, trinity
* God the Father, the first person in the trinity
* Christ, the second person of the trinity
* Holy Spirit, the third person in the trinity
3. spoken of the only and true God
* refers to the things of God
* his counsels, interests, things due to him
4. whatever can in any respect be likened unto God, or resemble him in any way
* God's representative or viceregent
1. of magistrates and judges”
Strong's:
“Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].”
Mounce's:
“God, usually refers to the one true God; in a very few contexts it refers to a (pagan) god or goddess. The Son of God as a title of Jesus emphasizes his unique relationship to the Father. The god of this age refers to the devil.”
This word could accurately be translated as “divine” in John 1:1, as in divine in nature or “a god.” This is a neutral term as far as good/ bad, obviously, as it is used in the Christian Greek scriptures to refer to both Satan and Jesus, also the Creator. This scripture alone cannot be used to prove that Jesus is God Almighty.
He prayed earnestly to his Father in heaven, he even had different desires at times, wanted something different and had to submit his will to his Father’s will. Luke 22:42-44.
Shelly – thank you for your heart to share the Gospel and help others dig deeper!
To the folks who feel the need to be unkind, bossy or make unwanted "suggestions" – there is no edification in your behavior or words,, so please stop. Is that how God has taught us by His son to behave? That answer is also a NO – perhaps you should use your time to love and encourage and not shake a finger and correct – we don't need that – God has not called any of His body to be like that – spend more time with God and let Him soften your heart and minister to you before you minister to others. Yes, iron sharpens iron – but it never said we tear others down to sharpen them – where the balm of Gilead? Where's the love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness or self-control. Share your fruit and not your flesh.
Another possibility for the Nephilim existence after the flood…
“IN the twenty ninth jubilee, in the first week, in the beginning thereof Arpakshad took to himself a woman and her name was Rasu'eya, the daughter of Shushan, the daughter of Eylam, and she bore him a son in the third year in this week, and he called his name Qeynan. And the son grew, and his father taught him writing, and he went to seek for himself a place where he might seize for himself a city.
👉And he found a writing which former generations had carved on the rock, and he read what was thereon, and he transcribed it and sinned owing to it;
👉 for it contained the teaching of the Watchers in accordance with which they used to observe the omens of the sun and moon and stars in all the signs of heaven. And he wrote it down and said nothing regarding it; 👉 for he was afraid to speak to Noach about it lest he should be angry with him on account of it. JUBILEES 8:1-4
No, Christ Jesus is God. He is the fulness of the Godhead, bodily.
There is a theory that Noah's sons' wives were unsure. You must really watch Rob Skiba's Archon Invasion series.
Yeshua/Jesus was the Son of God which is much different then a Nephilim. God is divine and the Only Divine Creator. A Nephilim is Fallen Angel and their offspring are gibbor=mighty men/giant. There is a big difference.
Plain and simple answer… NO.
Do you have a video discussing who are the watchers/sons of God? Thank you!
S.I.M. cards…SIAM dude's… "S" I AM idiots… JE-SUS-tinence followers…. S.I.M. cards….keep Fall LoWing, Amen dude's… EvErye "body in Christ" works for UNCLE SAM, one Way or anne' other…VET-erans…S.I.M. cards… moreMEN, morMONS, minions of JEW-Wishers folloWING JE-wishers…"SIAM"…SEA eweS in PSY-AM, SAM cards… LiLiths' son
Jesus was "in very nature God, He did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage; rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness."
The Hebrew Bk of Scriptures is NOT a Book we can 100% trust since it has been severely manipulated. For starters, the Book of Esther should not be part of the 'canon' as it is a greatly embellished story; instead it is a playbook when properly decoded for the coming disaster against the Hebrew Jacobites. The story about King David committing adultery is a lie; many details purposely left out. Uriah was a closet case h——; he was not attracted to women if you get my drift (I have to be careful with that 'h' word or risk being censored). Paul's writings should NOT be included as he is a false apostle who mixed truth with lies. The Bk of Hebrews also has been greatly manipulated and the second part of Acts is made-up to prop-up Paul as a hero. Even in Peter's writings we must be careful.
We MUST rely on the RUACH HA'KADESH to help us navigate through Scriptures and with other texts; it is SHE who brings us to truths as MESSIAH YAHAWASHI tells us (note: not the same as the Chrisitan male 'holy spirit' – the male holy spirit doctrine promotes a h—— Celestial Family, i.e. father, male partner, and child).
Abraham’s SEED/ DESCENDANTS were BIOLOGICAL
https://tueseahkiong.blogspot.com/2023/06/abrahams-seed-descendants-are-biological.html?m=1
I think you would be very interested in the Ron Wyatt YouTube videos regarding his discovery of the Ark of the Covenant and the sample of blood he had analyzed. I couldn't get enough when I first discovered his story / videos. I believe them to be true. This video about the "One of a kind" Son of God caused me to think about the chromosome count of Jesus and wonder what the chromosome count of the fallen angels and the Nephilim would look like.
I can see why this title would cause most to freak out. I really do, it's our Jesus and it's a spiritual war of the ages, the times are dark. I listened to the video and it's really good. So, if you see this and are on the fence just know it's not bad, it's not heretical at all. She actually calmly shows all the reasons why that the answer is no. Shelly is a teacher at heart. That's what I've learned from listening to her podcast. She does a good job of answering some tough questions without freaking out or flying off the handle or scolding. That's a true teacher. It's obviously a gift God has given her. May God bless and keep you all.
Was it just through dna that the nephilim survived the flood? I think the giants after were a lot smaller. Goliath and king Og were both only less than 15 ft. They were way bigger before the flood.
Thank you Shelly for asking the questions so many new believers and non Christians have and answering them in line with the Bible in a well thought out way. Even I, a seasoned Christian, am better equipped now to answer if this question comes up from someone who doesn’t know as much.
thank you for this i was pondering this for a while. the men of reknown wasnt good or bad they had a choice as well when i read the story of odin he just wanted knowledge of creation. Lord krishna slayed evil beings and did good deeds for mankind. Yah is the son of El Elyon and Yahusha is the son of Yah. Its all in the family literally.
Not sure that is correct, what it refers to is the manner of his entrance into the world as we are ,of the flesh ,the other son was cast down by Michael different in entering,and his pureness was how he could, that is what separates him from the rest, he some how lived as a man perfect to save us from being wiped from existence and now we always have a way to meet our maker through him and its the only way, he wins lmao
The book of Jude talks about the fallen angels, 🤔 the nephelim are their offspring when Jesus spoke the parable about the vineyard he addressed the fallen angels as it was Them who inserted their seed in the earth when men slept…🧐
Hero comes from the word Tyrant 👀
JESUS is GOD. 🕊🔥
Coming in the cimments makes me feel awful anymore. You guys can attack me for saying it, but there are SO MANY judgmental Believers in here. Knock it off, eh? Name calling, accusing each other… This is absolutely not the Way. Bye guys. Im going back to pretending the comments arent even turned on.
Thank you.
You constantly claim that you QUESTION THE NARRATIVE. Do you? Do you QUESTION THE NARRATIVE of your OWN DOCTRINE?
Do you QUESTION the Narrative of Jesus Christ, of which The Crucifixion is of Paramount Importance and is a Vital Symbol of Christianity. If you were Skeptical about it, you would QUESTION IT, and if you QUESTI0NED IT, you would inevitably find THIS:
Acts 5:30:
"The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and HANGED ON A TREE"
Acts 10:39:
"And we are witnesses of all things which he did both in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and HUNG FROM A TREE:"
Acts 13:29:
"And when they had fulfilled all that was written of him, they took him DOWN FROM THE TREE, and laid him in a sepulchre."
Peter 2:24:
"His own self bare our sins in his own body ON THE TREE, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness."
Now of course, since you're a Hyp.0°crite and a LIAR, you would never get that far. But if you DID, you would immediately look for counter-information to say why its a "Mistranslation" or doesn't mean what it OBVIOUSLY SAYS.
Let me save you some time, since I'm 1000x better at researching Y0UR Religion than y.0.u are:
The Apologist Argument is that "Hanged on a Tree" was a Colloquial Legal Expression that means being publicly exposed or put on Display for your crimes. Obviously this is a Bold Faced Lie, and assumes that Krishna and Odin really DID die on Trees, but in Jesus case it's a colloquial expression.. yea ok..
Anyways we don't need to argue that. All we have to do is look at Acts 13:29, which states they took him DOWN from The TREE and laid him in a Sepulchre. Taking him DOWN from The Tree proves that it's not being used as a colloquial expression – unless of course they want to conjure up ANOTHER colloquial expression to account for people being taken DOWN from Trees.
Also, let me save you some additional time: This "Tree" issue has NOTHING TO DO with the Word "Stauros". That's the word used in the parts where they actually state 'Cross'. That's a whole other issue, where the claim is that NOWHERE in the Bible is he put on a Cross, because Stauros never meant Cross. It only means Stake or Pole.
But I'm not even going to argue that Point right now. In other words, let's take for granted that in those instances, it is correct to say he was Crucified on a Cross.
That STILL doesnt account for the verses I have cited that SPECIFICALLY CLAIM HE WAS HUNG FROM A TREE.
So is The Doctrine of Crucifixion a FRAUD? Is it a LIE?
Are you going to question the official narrative or NOT?
The Official Narrative is That Christ was Crucified. I have supplied you with FAR MORE THAN ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO QUESTION THAT NARRATIVE.
Acts 5:30:
"The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and HANGED ON A TREE"
Acts 10:39:
"And we are witnesses of all things which he did both in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and HUNG FROM A TREE:"
Acts 13:29:
"And when they had fulfilled all that was written of him, they took him DOWN FROM THE TREE, and laid him in a sepulchre."
Peter 2:24:
"His own self bare our sins in his own body ON THE TREE, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness."
Now LET'S SEE YOU QUESTION THE CRUCIFIXION NARRATIVE.
YOU WON'T. I HA°TE LIARS.
Wonderful presentation Shelley.
You have given me great clarity, I cannot thank you enough.
I have been pondering how the pharaonic bloodline was not the influence on Jesus ( the Greek translation of Yashua, Greek numerology 888 ), with Joseph being made second only to pharaoh and getting married to pharaoh’s daughter, what influence did the curse of the slave technology/curse have on the future generations…. David’s bloodline, Yashua was obviously not effected.
Peace be with you
Great job SHELLY
If God created the flood to destroy the Nephilim how did the Nephilim outsmart God if God is all knowing? Why could not God just make them disappear instead of a flood? Why let the fallen angles corrupt humans in the first place? If the fallen angels are so intelligent then how could they really think they could defeat an all knowing God? The Old testament has a lot of unanswered questions.
Chemically. Mixing the genomes. They still do it today. We are falsely taught we are more advanced today than back then. We today are idiots.
I think the reason there would be "survivors" after a Flood, after the Millenial Reign, or after a "reset", might be genetics.
Left over genes or DNA. Something like that.
Don't some aspects of us skip a generation, or generations sometimes ? Like hair color, for example.
I'm not saying God can't, but maybe filtering out 100% of all the "evil genes", is pretty hard to do. Even with fires, floods & resets.
Kinda like trying to wash those really dirty work clothes. Sometimes wash & rinse takes a few repeats to get every last speck of out.
Are we in our last rinse cycle ? . . ✌️😎
What of Ham's offspring?
Have you ever considered YOUR interpretation is wrong, and NOT what Jesus was teaching? Here is the correct interpretation. Mt12:41-42. The men of Ninevah, and the Queen of the south. (O.T. believers) shall rise (Resurrect) in THE JUDGMENT with THIS GENERATION and CONDEMN IT. So, has THE resurrection happened? NO! Has THE judgment happened? NO! So, when Jesus said this generation shall NOT PASS till ALL be fulfilled. He did NOT mean physical death of that generation. He meant the SECOND death. Judgment DAY, Lake of Fire. Rev20:12-15. Preterism is a false teaching.
I guess people never think that Jesus turns people into Blood Drinkers and Flesh Eaters- Laws specifically outlawed By the Most High!! It’s not SYMBOLIC! Look at all the Celebrities who All WEAR the CROSS!! Do you think these are HOLY Law Abiding People?- Vampirism is Glorified and made Beautiful to the World while millions of people are being sacrificed 😵
Genesis 6:4 [4] There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God CAME IN UNTO the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. Luke 1:28 And the ANGEL CAME IN UNTO her, and said, Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.
Enoch "is not considered scripture" by modern western churches who believe the earth is a spinning ball,no such thing as Nephilim Askenazis are better than everyone else, the vaccine is good, etc.
It IS considered scripture by the Ethiopic church and.many othe believers such as.myself. it was considered fact by Jesus brother, and early Christians believed it yoo
Shelly, I love your channel. Thank you for everything you do. I appreciate you more than you will ever know. God Bless you!