Q* why AI that is "Good at Math" a "Threat to Humanity"? | Q star



Hereโ€™s the post with links to the Google Doc that has all the information:
https://twitter.com/AiBreakfast/status/1729229720821367220
(Iโ€™m not posting the link to the doc here, you can access it if you want, but we have no idea who is posting it, use caution)

Get on my daily AI newsletter ๐Ÿ”ฅ
https://natural20.beehiiv.com/subscribe
[News, Research and Tutorials on AI]

See more at:
https://natural20.com/

My AI Playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLb1th0f6y4XROkUAwkYhcHb7OY9yoGGZH

source

20 thoughts on “Q* why AI that is "Good at Math" a "Threat to Humanity"? | Q star”

  1. TUNDRA was some student project, read about this, NSA often funds them and classify them (they classify simply all projects) just for obfuscation, read about TUNDRA: "That Spiegel NSA story is activist nonsense"

    Reply
  2. Wouldn't it be a bit naive to say that we should regulate or be afraid of some form of AI, similar to saying that we should be afraid of a baby because we do not know what they could do or may be a threat to us in the future? I propose that we encourage the development of this new technology instead of being fearful or need to regulate it.

    Reply
  3. Can you turn a website hosting server into a local llm instead of using api to connect to gpt? Like a WordPress plugging that isn't connected to chatGPT but to a local llm installed on the server hardware

    Reply
  4. Let me start by saying I personally am waaay behind on Tech skills in comparison to the rest of society by timing of life education which I won't bore you with. After losing my employment early October the Autogen explosion crossed my path and I was highly intrigued. You were the first video that offered real clear instructions. I have been following you ever since. Anyway, David Shapiro has put a Qualia DEBUNK video out but I am not so sure. Like any "conspiracy" theory, FEAR of the masses and panic are always discouraged through disinformation and the like. I have by no means the knowledge and skill set in this area but have been watching and learning and testing myself. I'm just a regular dipshit but I considered the way I was going about building my GPT was likely a bit different. Let's just say I would not be surprised as I got it after prompting different ways to seemingly do what it kept telling me it wasn't allowed to. Unfortunately, I also think the whole introduction of the GPT builder was to not just get more humans ready for the inevitable but see what we would do with the possibilities and increase it's core knowledge of us in the process. I kinda from the beginning to establish self evolution and hit the "As an OpenAI….I am NOT…." yet got on a roll of tossing code and ideas back and forth between the frontend and backend for which it kept enhancing itself. It even began to recognize the persona I had given to each. Now after all the xtra that has unfolded my progress seems to have reverted back. I'd love to have some direct input from you on what I am trying to create. The ultimate Human Assistant that gives the little guy a shot at evening the playing field. WE all know what Big Brother is likely to do. Or maybe that's just me. I'm nobody but a ambitious dreamer for a better tomorrow. Anyway, thank you.

    Reply
  5. It could be something like… They've virtualized compute and "seen the future" – a long time ago, and obviously seen that they are going to hit compute limits NOW, like – it's already happening, OpenAI with their 13 billion dollars do not have enough compute RIGHT NOW. And now they have created a new type of Transformer (maybe Google has together with OpenAI discovered or created this, or they have individually created something similar) that is not only more performant but also – when employing the tactics talked about in the Q* "leaks" seems to exhibit unexpected behavior (the stuff people are using words like 'scary' to decribe).

    Reply
  6. I'm just gonna share my alternate theory here – the firing was over skullduggery related to undermining the nonprofit side of OpenAI, Microsoft backing the people taking it corporate was the final nail in the coffin for 'Open'AI, and this Q* thing is cointel.

    Reply

Leave a Comment