Putin 'FINISHED' as Russian Losses in Ukraine SKYROCKET



1,000 days into a war that was supposed to last three, Ukraine has defied the odds, turning the tide against Russia. The brutal conflict has left Russia facing staggering losses: hundreds of thousands of troops, thousands of vehicles, and shattered morale. A daring Ukrainian offensive into Kursk exposed Moscow’s vulnerabilities, and with U.S.-supplied long-range missiles in play, Russia’s position is crumbling fast. Is this the beginning of the end for Putin’s war?

#militarystrategy #militarydevelopments #militaryanalysis
#themilitaryshow

SOURCES: https://pastebin.com/4y0uTGQQ
ATTRIBUTIONS: https://pastebin.com/FSGiPRU8

source

43 thoughts on “Putin 'FINISHED' as Russian Losses in Ukraine SKYROCKET”

  1. for all the horror that is ukraine-russia war I think the world needed a reminder of what open warfare between countries really looks like not the hunting down of terrorist organizations and constant plain clothes skirmishing that occurred in the Middle East.

    Reply
  2. It's looking bad for Russia… that is, until Trump gets into office and withholds US funds and armament from Ukraine. Trump will support Russia in that conflict, either overtly or behind the scenes.

    Reply
  3. How can you sit there and lie like this? Russia is taking territory at record rates. This war is all but over in Russia is winning. I could care less about Russia. I don't like them at all. But you're just brainwashing people

    Reply
  4. This is Putin' war not the Russian people his aggrandize ego of being another Stalin of the USSR Soviet Union has loss almost million of it's men and huge loss of military equipment. Like Mussolini he will destroy his country because of his ambitions of territorial aggrandizement.

    Reply
  5. Where ever there is a war on planet earth, US is behind the war. Its 50 countries against one country. USSR has won the mighty Germans. Putin has been very soft on Ukraine. Once Putin is adequately irritated Ukraine may not be on the map. Let just the west and US stop funding the war and peace will persist.

    Reply
  6. People can argue about whether it has been good for the United States to have been involved in armed conflicts for the last 70-80+ years, but something that those conflicts have allowed is the constant shaping and reshaping of combat technology and doctrines, and evolving combat communications systems. We may not suffer 0 losses but we can fight wars where we minimize casualties by incorporating shock and awe tactics and the like!

    Our military isn't afraid to embed reporters with the troops because our troops are disciplined and transparent! Our troops can face criticism when warranted.

    We also root out corruption with programs that shine light on fraud, waste, and abuse!

    Unfortunately, if a military doesn't have watch dog organizations rooting out corruption then you get things like this where Russia finds out too late that its military wasn't what it thought it was! The same thing happened in Afghanistan where corrupt officials pocketed money that was meant for military forces and they ended up getting exposed when the US pulled out. They were not expecting us to pull out entirely, as fast as we did, and were caught with their pants down!

    The fact is military spending MUST be watched and audited regularly! Heck, the US has whole offices and departments that investigate spending, like the Inspector General's office and the Government Office of Accounting!

    Where there is large sums of money there MUST be watch dogs guarding it!

    Reply
  7. Trump is a draft dodging coward who acts as Putin's puppet. Ukraine should pay no attention to anything he says or does and should instead use what it can get from its other allies until we get a proper leader back in power in 4 years.

    Reply
  8. Lastly, in regards to the use of Nuclear weapons, I would argue that if Russia resorted to the use of nuclear weapons, they would not come back from that decision. Besides the fact that nuclear fallout would likely get caught up in the Jet Stream and would affect both them and China! Not to mention any other potential allies in the region!

    Could you imagine if that ICBM that Russia launched at Ukraine was supposed to be a nuclear weapon, but if it had turned out to be a dud? Wouldn't that be a slap in the face?

    Reply
  9. oh but the ukranians are about to lose one of their most important strategic keypoints in the southern Donetsk region… shame that the western media is force-feeding these lies upon people.

    Reply

Leave a Comment