Propellent Leak Ends SpaceX's Launch Record



Last night a Falcon 9 Launching Starlink Group 9-3 out of Vandenberg managed to get to the initial orbit, but failed before reaching the target orbit.
This is the first SpaceX launch failure in over 300 launches, a record that nobody else in the launch business can claim.

Follow me on Twitter for more updates:
https://twitter.com/DJSnM

I have a discord server where I regularly turn up:
https://discord.gg/zStmKbM

If you really like what I do you can support me directly through Patreon
https://www.patreon.com/scottmanley

source

43 thoughts on “Propellent Leak Ends SpaceX's Launch Record”

  1. "…so, y'know, you gotta understand these problems before you go forwards and continue launching high-value payloads on them."

    Tell that to Boeing, cause I don't think they got that memo.

    Reply
  2. I appreciate your channel Scott, please carry on!! A comment/question, on the return of the Starship booster etc, why don't they rotate the device, about it's longitudinal axis and orient it perpendicular to the return trajectory, such that more surface area would be available to radiate the energy as the velocity decreases, thus reducing the maximum temperatures reached by the reentry tiles? The 'hot' side would cool as it turned away from the flow of the onrushing air, thus reducing the maximum temperatures. I realize that would complicate the control system a bit. Maybe this is already being done?

    Reply
  3. I'm not an expert at all, but it's interesting to see the difference in success rate between the Falcon and Starship launches. Is scaling up rockets that much more complicated, or is the development of Starship just rushed?

    Comparing the grasshopper tests with the first Starship launch on bare concrete without any acoustic or debris countermeasures, it's like two entirely different companies at work.

    Reply
  4. “Spacex says it will not be able to recover the 20 Starlink satellites left in a very low orbit after a malfunction of a Falcon 9 upper stage on a July 11 launch. They have been unable to raise the orbit because the electric propulsion systems on the spacecraft cannot counteract the high atmospheric drag the satellites encounter in their very low orbits.” So directly from the source, NO PLAID POWER!

    Reply
  5. SpaceX has had 297 launches and recoveries with no mishaps. This was a minor mishap and the only thing that was lost, Is SpaceX property. The space shuttle had 135 launches with 2 catastrophic failures, Including loss of life. The Apollo program had fatality's, before it ever left the ground. Getting to space is hard and they aren't building Toyota Corollas, to get there but mile for mile SpaceX is far more reliable.

    Reply
  6. You know everyone is saying well that's just one in hundreds that's such a great failure rate. And I agree. But it actually sounds like the FAA's response to this is to actually ground the falcon9 until the mishap investigation is concluded?! That seems pretty ridiculous to me. First off, the flight did indeed pose no public safety risk; the first stage landed properly on OCISLY, and it was only the second stage's second burn that had a failure, well after it was into orbit. Failing to deliver satellites to a high enough orbit is not a failure worthy of grounding the most successful rocket in history. Sounds to me like they're absolutely laying it on to SpaceX just because of all their competitors crying foul over the last few months.

    Reply
  7. Sr 71 blackbird top speed mph 2200 miles per hour any faster the air frame will WILL Fail,

    If a space shuttle flies “like a brick”, why does it need wings? To attain orbit at a speed of 17,500 mph (5 mile per second) Sr71 …0.61 Miles per second, any faster the air frame will WILL Fail,

    i may be daft but i am not stupid, WHAT A DRAG, So Space is a Cartoon.

    Reply
  8. I have enjoyed your channel and wish you well but since Elon's endorsement of Mr Trump I am afraid I have to unsubscribe from all channels which report on matters relating to any of Elon's businesses. Sorry about that.

    Reply

Leave a Comment