Normans vs. Anglo-Saxons: The Gruesome 11th-Century Battle Of Hastings | Warfare | Chronicle



In the early morning of 14 October 1066, two great armies prepared to fight for the throne of England. On a hilltop 7 miles from Hastings were the forces of Harold, who had been crowned king nine months earlier. Facing them on the far side of the valley below were the troops of Duke William of Normandy, who believed he was the rightful king. By the end of the day, thousands lay dead on the battlefield, and the victorious William was one step nearer to seizing the throne.

Welcome to Chronicle; your home for all things medieval history! With documentaries covering everything from the collapse of the Roman Empire to the beginnings of the Renaissance, from Hastings to Charlemagne, weโ€™ll be exploring everything the Middle Ages have to offer.

Subscribe now so you donโ€™t miss out!

Chronicle is part of the History Hit Network. To get in touch please email [email protected].

Itโ€™s like Netflix for historyโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ“บ Sign up to History Hit, the worldโ€™s best history documentary service and get 50% off using the code โ€˜CHRONICLEโ€™ ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://bit.ly/3iVCZNl

source

31 thoughts on “Normans vs. Anglo-Saxons: The Gruesome 11th-Century Battle Of Hastings | Warfare | Chronicle”

  1. It must be looked at as two battles for King Harold. If his brother Tostig had not brought in Hardrada of Norway. Harold could have very well swept Duke William into the sea that day. The Battle of Hastings lasted all day long. Because Harold's position was so strong. So even though depleted from the first engagement at Stamford Bridge against King Hardradas army. Harold was still able to fend off Williams army all day. But the continued pressure of the Norman's took the day. On that day an Anglo Saxon King died and a continental Duke of a Norman Duchy became King of England. And the King of France was informed the next day his vassal was now King of England!

    Reply
  2. If it wasn't for the battle of Stamford Bridge at York against Harald Hardrada and his Vikings a few week's earlier Harald Godwinson may well have won the battle of Hastings. Stamford Bridge and Hastings probably weren't coincidental. William may well have known about the Viking plan to invade England and probably seen an opitunity arise and took it knowing whichever army won at Stamford Bridge would have been significantly weakened thus making it an easier fight for his Normans. William probably had spies both in England and in Norway it's hard to believe he didn't know and the traitor Tostic was communicating with both invaders. To this day it cannot be proven for sure but was one likely scenario of the events of 1066.

    Reply
  3. Us Brythonics sort of got on with the Saxons, but the Normans were another thing completely – they were total bastards, so to speak. ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ท๓ ฌ๓ ณ๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜Ž

    Reply
  4. I often wonder how much better England would have been had the Normans never entered the picture. Imagine an English language with out all those foreign French words and a continuous line of royal Saxon kings!

    Reply
  5. William had already landed and had a good foot hold in his current location. Why did Harold wish to fight him so soon. Why didn't he wait to regroup, rest and strengthen his army.

    Reply
  6. Wooden Alfred the Great's descendants be running Wessex or is he The King Alfred the Great's descending is the King right cuz I know Alfred son was the King after him and then his illegitimate son with the King then Apple Stein or whatever applestein

    Reply
  7. House hold grabs, thats that go grab all the big brothers on the block to com together to brawl against the other blocks posse with also all the big brothers on their block because shits finn hit the fan who ever comes out swinging harder first wins thats my type of fight

    Reply

Leave a Comment