New York Times Attacked by Activists Over Trans Coverage, But Stands Firm, on National Review Day



Megyn Kelly is joined by Jim Geraghty and Michael Brendan Dougherty of National Review to discuss GLAAD and other journalists attacking the New York Times over its somewhat balanced coverage of trans issues, the New York Times standing firm and not backing down, what this cultural moment shows us, and more.

LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos everyday: https://bit.ly/3Aw93yw

Watch full clips of The Megyn Kelly Show here: https://bit.ly/3xFXNxI

Sign up for American News Minute – My Weekly Email Conversation with You: https://www.megynkelly.com

Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts:
Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-megyn-kelly-show/id1532976305
Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/0awxEJH88Xur0GHXuteBLw?si=0EcxxHSLQhO2uYmpUN13KQ&dl_branch=1

Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms:
Twitter — https://twitter.com/MegynKellyShow
Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/megynkellyshow/
Facebook — https://www.facebook.com/MegynKellyShow

Connect with me on social media:
Twitter — https://twitter.com/megynkelly
Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/megynkelly/
Facebook — https://www.facebook.com/MegynKellyShow #MegynKelly #MegynKelly #MegynKellyShow #JimGeraghty #MichealBrendanDougherty #AlexMurdaugh #SouthPark #DonLemon #ChrisCuomo #CNN #MegynKelly #NationalReview #DonLemon #Misogyny #NikkiHaley #ChrisCuomo #News #PresidentBiden #RaciallyInsensitive #TransActivism #NewYorkTimes #COVIDOrigins #WHO #SouthPark #HarryAndMeghan #AlexMurdaughTrial #Prosecution #Defense #LawyerYouKnow

source

36 thoughts on “New York Times Attacked by Activists Over Trans Coverage, But Stands Firm, on National Review Day”

  1. "Right wing conspiracies" have been proven true the past few years. Plus since when have verifiable stats been called "misinformation?" There have not been long-term studies done on the effects of transitioning children because this is a new fad. So these kids are basically guinea pigs with no research backing why hormones and reconstruction surgeries should be the solution to a temporary whim on the part of minors.😡

    And if the NYT is labeled "right wing" for having common sense, it shows how seriously radical these people are.

    Reply
  2. Why does the United States involve itself in a war in which it has no interest, not even a member of NATO, such as Russia's war with Ukraine?? And this war is far from it and does not concern it or the American people in anything?!
    Isn't it enough that America has inserted itself into all the problems of the world, and there is no war in the East or the West without participating in it, whether by supplying and supplying weapons or by direct participation by paying its soldiers and forcing them to enter these wars?! What are the gains achieved by the US administration in wars such as Afghanistan, Iraq and others?
    And now its direct or indirect interference with the conflict of Russia and Ukraine, and who knows, perhaps in the future its conflict with China!! Isn't it enough what America lost in terms of casualties, the soldiers who participated in these battles?
    And why does President Biden's administration insist on continuous interference in the affairs of other countries?

    Reply
  3. I find it hilarious that a tiny minority of people, most of whom don’t subscribe to or advertise with the NYT think they can make demands of a private company and that company would even consider the rants of obviously mentally unstable people. They brought this on themselves and it’s glorious to watch.

    Reply
  4. I don't see why you would need to bring in people for the 'other' take on an issue. If you have journalists, who have the same things to say about Y or Z, they're bored. Why wouldn't you give journalists writing assignments to take on the other point of view, if they did the opposite a month ago? It's just not healthy to have ONE slant and that's who you are. It's almost as bad as saying you're in the middle. You show you're in the middle by taking on both extremes, not by saying both sides are lousy and so you're in the middle. China, translated into English, is 'Middle Country.' They don't understand disagreement, so they all have to agree on everything. Trans people, at this time, are taking this communist approach to their cause. Everyone has to agree to agree with them. Obviously a very good sign from the NYT.

    Reply

Leave a Comment