NEW North Korean Vehicles We Could Get in War Thunder!

by



ChieftainWarriors posts:
United Tree: https://forum.warthunder.com/t/united-korea-ground-forces-tech-tree/75456
North Korea Sub Tree: https://forum.warthunder.com/t/north-korean-ground-forces-sub-tree/11671
Negative_Jaguar_4138 His Redit Post: https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1dsfh0i/north_korean_subtree_concept_for_china/
Pikpikkers Tech Tree: https://pikpikker.neocities.org/dprk_wt

Music used:
We Will Safeguard the Leadership of the Revolution with Desperate Courage!/혁명의 수뇌부 결사옹위하리라
Mozart, Ave Verum Corpus. K.618
9th Symphony finale, Beethoven

Time Stamps:
0:00 Intro
0:15 How Korea Should be added
0:54 Warning
3:17 South Korea Corrections
4:32 Copy Paste, Soviet/Chinese
5:29 Main Battle Tanks
12:16 323 Series
14:55 Artillery
19:21 Wheeled Vehicles
22:13 Anti Air
24:33 Conclusion/Outro

source

26 thoughts on “NEW North Korean Vehicles We Could Get in War Thunder!”

  4. I’ve been wanting North Korea in the game for a long time. In one of my vids years ago I talked about how they could get added but not so much which vehicles in depth. Good job I actually learned about ones I never knew about from your vid

    Reply

  11. The information I have is that the reason North Korea never had IFVs in its arsenal has to do with their mechanized doctrine.

    In the North Korean mindset, "mechanization" means "using motor vehicles to safely transport soldiers to the frontline", not "using motor vehicles to transport and coordinate combat with infantry". The North Koreans known the idea of ​​combined arms warfare, but in their doctrine, their infantry would often fight as foot infantry, supposedly to create flexibility and surprise in combat in the complex terrain conditions that were common on the Korean peninsula and not well suited to large-scale Soviet-style armored operations.

    As a result, the doctrine would have a large requirement for APCs and trucks, but almost no need for IFVs. APCs and trucks would carry infantry to an assembly point, where the infantry would dismount and walk to the fighting area, while the vehicles would either fall back to safety, or return to pick up subsequent columns of troops.

    Reply

  12. Nice Video, could you maybe also make one about all the potential domestic / unique Vehicles we could get for China? I even made a Thread on the Forum about the 'best suggestions for China'

    Reply

  14. i dont get why people are still so suprised north korea has so much and can produce all of this, because north korea has kept its cold war industry alive and still has what is basically a war economy thats constantly producing as if they were at war right now, which technically they are

    Reply

  16. The fact that most countries don't put Man-Pad on their tanks like North Korea is a crime.
    Than again tho, North Korea only puts Man-Pads on their tanks due to their inability to reliability shoot down Helicopters, compared to the modern vehicles used by Western countries.

    Reply

  19. south korea tech tree!!! plus i dont see a reason why gaijin cant add north korea, there can be no back lash for it, after all, who is gonna get pissed about the option to do so? you think many north korean war thunder players are gonna voice their distaste for it?….oh wait…there are no north korean players XD.

    Reply

  21. I think Korea should be one tech tree as they can compliment each other. Also gaijin could do same thing as israel and have the Korea tech tree and any outstanding liw tier tanks can be event vehicles

    Reply

Leave a Comment