New Intuitive Machines' moon lander images shows 'broken landing gear' and tilt



The Intuitive Machines’ Odysseus lander tipped over after a landing gear broke on the surface of the moon during touchdown. Intuitive Machines CEO Steve Altemus explains at a news briefing on Feb. 28, 2024.

Credit: NASA

source

44 thoughts on “New Intuitive Machines' moon lander images shows 'broken landing gear' and tilt”

  1. Yeah 50 years ago we were supposedly able to watch The Moon landing live yet in 2024 we had to wait hours after to even get data in days to just get pictures. Makes you wonder about what actually happened 50 years ago.

    Reply
  2. Seriously? Brilliant performance? Guys, it's 2024. The landing could have gone wrong, but the images you've shared are worse than those taken back during the Apollo days. Come on you guys, let's get serious and respect each other. We understand photography wasn't the main purpose for this lander as there were other things to be done, tested and performed. But sharing some crappy fisheye lens photos of such a low quality is way below expectations today when digital photography performed by tiny smartphone cameras is often phenomenal.

    Reply
  3. Back in 1969 Apollo, they were able to live TV broadcast from the moon "one giant step for mankind", and now 55 years later it takes days to figure out computer animations had wrong rendition of the real situation. Back in 1969, all were done with chemical film cameras, rotary dialing phones …

    Reply
  4. Stupid design, wasted taxpayer so much money. This happens when a stumped man has control of it. He makes everything else strong and durable, just the little bit of the critical part weak like hell, and he say it is for the sake of saving taxpayer's money.

    Reply
  5. I think Biden did the damage to this mission, he is more focused on stealing votes from the election, and NASA is his royal follower, shifted funding to the joint plot, and never have to worry about any fault they make being hold responsible.

    Reply
  6. Hey yall, I i know 8k cameras came out a decade ago, but heres some shitty low res fisheye on our mission that costs $297 million, we didn't have any money left for anything other than something that takes worse photos than 10 year old iphone 6 😂😂😂

    Reply
  7. Yet …… in 1969 the moon landing went flawlessly with human beings aboard were able to transmit live video and audio and yet we are here over 50 years later not being able Sen video or audio. AMAZING!!!!

    Reply
  8. Imagine how easily this could have happened in Apollo… 😮. It nearly did on one…. The Apollo 15 LEM was tilted and the landing was almost hard and ended up tilted like 12 degrees..

    Reply
  9. In Dec 2020, China's Chang-5 lunar lander safely landed on the moon. Then it automatically sampled of 3.8 pounds (1,731 grams) of lunar rocks. Then it succesfully lifted off and rocketed the samples safely back to Earth. I wonder if USA/NASA is able to perform such mission at this stage.

    Reply
  10. The "Relentless Positivity" of a "spokesperson" whether he be an engineer or not seems SO VERY disingenuous. Yes there is much to be learned. Yes overall it is something of a success as the lander did function on the surface of the Moon.
    COMPLETELY glossing over the major procedural failures that brought this to occur and just white-washing this as "GREAT SUCCESS!!!" (Borat voice) just makes you look less competent and seemingly not self aware.
    NOT admitting fault is **NOT** "good science and engineering". Pretending "Nothing wrong here!" just makes you look weak.
    Your engineers and technicians deserve better.

    Reply
  11. the article you wrote on this landing was all about the apollo bullshit. you couldnt even focus on this moon lander and only the moon lander. everytime i read your shit on moon landings all you do is talk about someone bullshit apollo days horseshit. everyone wants to hear only about todays moon landers, rovers, habitats , and anything about todays moon space ventures.

    Reply
  12. I see many people focusing on the broken leg, but they still got it to land on the moon. I dont see any of these naysayers doing what they did by landing a spacecraft on the moon.

    Reply
  13. according to the deniers they just have to go onto the set and set it back up. would save a lot of face.just deny it tipped over and right it back up.or is their thinking now is the cgi is too expensive for a complete mission just cut it short with a tip over?

    Reply

Leave a Comment