NASA's Plan to Colonise the Moon



This is how 3D printing works in space.
Purchase shares in art from Pablo Picasso, Banksy, Andy Warhol and more – https://www.masterworks.art/tomorrowsbuild

This video contains paid promotion for Masterworks. See important disclosures – https://www.masterworks.com/about/disclaimer?utm_source=tomorrowsbuild&utm_medium=youtube&utm_campaign=2-28-23&utm_term=Tomorrows+Build+subscriber

β€œNet returns” refers to the annualised internal rate of return net of all fees and costs, calculated from the offering closing date to the sale date. IRR may not be indicative of Masterworks paintings not yet sold and past performance is not indicative of future results.

Masterworks’ offerings are filed with the SEC, view all past and current offerings here – https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=masterworks

Additional footage and imagery courtesy of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, NASA, Reuters, CNN, Space X, Courtesy of Ellipse Programme / Nelvana Limited, C-SPAN, ICON, 20TH Century Television, CBS, Discovery Australia, NBC News, BBC News, Wall Street Journal, Touchstone Pictures, Disney Pixar, Universal Pictures, AMPLab, University of Birmingham and Sony Pictures Classic.

For more by Tomorrow’s Build subscribe now – https://bit.ly/3vOOJ98

Join our mailing list – https://bit.ly/tomorrows-build

Listen to The World’s Best Construction Podcast
Apple – https://apple.co/3OssZsH
Spotify – https://spoti.fi/3om1NkB
Amazon Music – https://amzn.to/3znmBP4

Follow us on Twitter – https://twitter.com/TomorrowsBuild/
Like us on Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/TomorrowsBuild/
Follow us on TikTok – https://www.tiktok.com/@tomorrowsbuild
Follow us on LinkedIn – https://www.linkedin.com/company/TomorrowsBuild/
Follow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/TomorrowsBuild/

#construction​ #architecture​ #space

Tomorrow’s Build is owned and operated by The B1M Limited. We welcome you sharing our content to inspire others, but please be nice and play by our rules: http://www.theb1m.com/guidelines-for-sharing

Our content may only be embedded onto third party websites by arrangement. We have established partnerships with domains to share our content and help it reach a wider audience. If you are interested in partnering with us please contact [email protected].

Ripping and/or editing this video is illegal and will result in legal action.

Β© 2023 The B1M Limited

source

43 thoughts on “NASA's Plan to Colonise the Moon”

  1. I understand that the moon is a stepping stone to Mars. What I don't know is why researchers prefer Alpha Centari over Wolf 359. It seems conspiratorial. Like as an agenda of usury by the 1% or something dreadful like that. Also it seems that the best local heliotropical neighborhood for extraction might be on extra heavy planets, when we might get there. Looking at trends in servitude economically, and understanding scifi like a kind of temporal cartograph, I believe that our interstellar concerns need to be addressed long before we leave the solar system. <3 Amazing freaking episode! <3

    Reply
  2. The transition into the sponsorship was very smooth, but I can't deny I'm sad that it's for a company like Masterworks which in my opinion preys on people's lack of financial literacy.

    Reply
  3. Building a moon base above the lunar surface is suicidal. There is far too much radiation. The moon has no Van Allen belt and is exposed to the full radioactive fury of the solar wind. This is why helium-3, considered an optimal fuel for possible fusion reactors is plentiful on the lunar surface

    Reply
  4. Lol you show footage about "Mars one" at the beginning, but that was little more than an idea, they never actually got any formal work done – and it was like nearly ten years ago, it's been kaput for ages.

    Reply
  5. To the people wondering why, as they put it, this or that amazing idea about doing something in space, specifically on the Moon has not been done yet? Except for the brief glimpse of Mars One they showed at the beginning, which was honestly rather deceitful, it usually boils down to a few things:

    -Spaceflight is hard. Very hard.
    -Spaceflight has been very expensive.
    -Human spaceflight has been intensely political

    We have not gone back to the Moon, despite being completely technologically capable, because of NASA being tossed about in the wind by every change in presidential administration, and congress mandating this or that rocket technology be used for jobs programs.

    But the good news at least is that things are changing. Commercial spaceflight is reducing the cost of spaceflight big time, concurrently, NASA has finally achieve bipartisan support for Artemis, as well as various international partners, and a lot of innovation is happening to help make spaceflight technology more reliable and regular than it's been in the past.

    It will still go slower than we would like. Even with all the money in the world, it involves a lot of starts and stops, prototyping, failures, etc. Even in completely successful, on track programs, caution and redundancy are built in to make sure that expensive delicate hardware, and even more delicate humans, are being taken care of.

    The timeline of getting humans back on the Moon by 2025 is likely not going to happen, because of difficulty in getting all of the elements of the landing mission ready – the human landing system, the EVA suits, and of course, the infamously slow space launch system rocket – but it WILL happen, if not in 2026, 2027. I have full confidence that we will be back on the Moon by the end of the decade, and this time, have much more sustainable architecture to keep going, rather than brief Apollo program in the 60s.

    Reply
  6. I'm sorry, in what precise way has 3D printing failed? I clearly never got that memo. I'm also a bit baffled by the whole β€˜it's obsolete and it's also too new to use’ vibe. Altogether a really confusing video, I'm afraid.

    Also, what's the connection between space explanation and the development of mice? I know about the work at SRI, AEG and Xerox PARC in the 60s and 70sβ€”is the connection somehow through NASA's funding of SRI? Why isn't the connection with space research (if there indeed is one) more widely known?

    Reply
  7. Isn't moon dust irradiated by solar and other radiation sources from the lack of an atmosphere? Turning that into building materials wouldn't harm inhabitants long term?

    Reply
  8. An important consideration of what NASA needs to get built on the Moon or Mars is that it needs shielding thick enough to dampen harmful radiation. The habitat itself, the pressurized livable space will be shipped from Earth. What is unaffordable is the shielding that goes on top of it. Like a glasis on a Napoleonic era fortress, the earth embankment to dampen the impact of artillery. That is just piled-up soil. The structure of the fort itself is made of stone or bricks, the usual building materials. So, 3D printing in space is basically limited to piles of regolith on top of the actual habitat. There is no such a need on Earth.

    Reply
  9. It never happened, but Artemis and Mars… No, problem… w/CGI …LOL
    "I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond, the problem is that we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again." Don Pettit, 'Astronaut' LOL

    Reply
  10. What is the plan for not getting irradiated on the moon? The ISS is protected by the magnetosphere.
    Even if there is no plan, I'm sure lots of people would volunteer to die up there, I would.

    Reply
  11. 2026? Not even by 2036. It will take at LEAST another 20…30+ years before this dream becomes a reality. It's great to talk and fantasize this happening, but this planet has OTHER issues it needs to overcome before this happens. This would be similar to wanting to open a Starbucks by next week in Eastern Ukraine. Good luck on that.

    Reply

Leave a Comment