Meghan Green with Envy as Princess Charlotte Steals the Spotlight at Christmas Walk: A&L Who?

by



Meghan Green with Envy as Princess Charlotte Steals the Spotlight at Christmas Walk: A&L Who?
👉👉Please subscribe to my channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC22BJ6cTbOodzm89LIHEgtg?sub_confirmation=1
👉👉You Can See More Videos Like This HERE:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEuNEr-eK6tbH6mFX9h-cE6GqVbk_DqBF

Meghan Markle must’ve been seething watching Princess Charlotte shine like the little star she is during the royal Christmas walk. There’s Charlotte, just nine years old, confidently interacting with the public, taking selfies like it’s no big deal.

#royal #royalfamily #princeharry #meghanmarkle #katemiddleton #princewilliam #lilibet #archie #queen #kingcharles #queenelizabeth

source

47 thoughts on “Meghan Green with Envy as Princess Charlotte Steals the Spotlight at Christmas Walk: A&L Who?”

  8. Prince George, princess Charlotte, and prince louis are amazing beautiful children prince William and princess Catherine are doing amazing parents i do not care about prince harry and meghan children.

    Reply

  9. Kaysee here … why are the Sussex kids kept out of sight and under lock and key? I have an easy answer to that. Migraine doesn't want anyone to take the spotlight away from her and that includes her children. I expect "she and he" are keeping them hidden until they have nothing left to offer and then they'll sell them to the highest bidder. It will end up that Archie and Lili will be the money earners of that family. Poor kids!!

    Reply

  11. Exactly, if they had gone over to America and just lived a private life and maybe looked for work or she had started her aro, it would have been so very different, but they didn't they slagged their or his family off for money, now their names are mud and no one trusts them, deserved!

    Reply

  20. Oh little stars of Bethlehem, the Waleses 3 royal kids & the other relatives little ones, did shine after all that Christmas night. Here, we were singing & Dancing to the music. It's just glorious Princess Catherine. With these little stars they really keep us young. Amen

    Reply

  21. Those Sussex children are missing out on the friendship that only cousins have between themselves, it’s a shame that their parents just don’t care about that. Family is so important and the Sussex children are missing out on grandfathers, aunts,uncles and especially their cousins

    Reply

  24. Oh it was OBVIOUSLY money that led the Sussex's – so far they've got everything wrong and now the majority of the world firmly believes they don't actually HAVE any children in the first place!

    Reply

  26. We don’t see the Sussex children because they aren’t the Diana clones that Harry’s wife wants them to be. I suspect they look like the Markle side of the family and that’s not good enough for their mother

    Reply

  27. You mean Rachel is her name, and those kids are a NOBODY & A NOTHING, they are the IT children and as for Princess Charlotte, she has CLASS and IS VERY INTELLIGENT, a very NORMAL BEAUTIFUL YOUNG LADY and a REAL ROYAL, She's a NATURAL BORN REAL ROYAL, she's a HRH through and through and her brothers also

    Reply

  30. Her jealousy of Princess Charlotte is because she knows herself and those so called kids, especially invisabet, will always have to bow down to her. Same as with Princess Catherine and more so when she becomes Queen. She wants to be Catherine and wants what Catherine has for herself and wants invisabet to have and be like Charlotte so bad that it eats her up inside and brings out the narcassistic vindictiveness out of her. She thinks her and those "kids" should be the most important, most relevent people in the monarchy and can't stand it that they will never be anything but bottom of the totem pole.

    Reply

  31. She thinks, or shall we say demands that just because that family has titles that they will be American royalty, will be treated as such and therefore not have to work for anything in their lifetimes. That people will fawn all over them and just give them opportunities without having to work for them. That's why she hurriedly got that prince, those titles, those kids and then fled to the US. She was never going to be anything in the UK but Princess Catherine's shadow whereas in the US everyone would be fawning all over her and she would be put on a pedestal 😂😅

    Reply

  38. STOP !! 🤚 Children are off limits…they're innocent, they haven't done anything & don't deserve your offensive comments!

    Absolutely go after Harry & his wife, they're LIARS & bullies just for starters. I fully support that!

    "If" the Sussex's children actually exist then I don't believe that they were born via Harry's wife's body but by surrogates! I DON'T believe that Lili is biologically related to Harry's wife.
    "IF" the children were born via surrogates then they are automatically disqualified from the Line of Succession and any titles.
    I believe that since NO legal documentation has been submitted from the hospitals, Doctor's or the Sussex's to Parliament & the Palace legally proving that either child was legally witnessed being born via Harry's wife's body – then it's Parliament's & the Palace's LEGAL responsibility to remove the Sussex's children from the Line of Succession until such time as the proper LEGAL documentation has been submitted and made available to the public to verify!
    I believe that since she faked her pregnancy with Archie, LIED about his birth, presented a DOLL to the world instead of a real live child, has repeatedly used other people's children & children's photos & claimed that it was Archie  – that the Sussex's must submitt supervised DNA samples for testing from BOTH parents AND children, to prove that at minimum BOTH children are Biologically related to both Harry and his legally wedded wife.
    I believe that without LEGAL documentation from the Doctor's & from each Hospital proving that either child was Witnessed being born from Harry's legally wedded wife's body AND supervised DNA testing done upon Both children against BOTH parents proving that Both children are Biologically related to Both parents …then the children MUST be removed from the Line of Succession until legal proof is submitted & made available to the  public upon request … The public being the citizens of the UK & Commonwealth Countries where His Majesty the King is the Head of State!
    Otherwise it's fraudulent and caused doubt & distrust in the future legitimacy of the BRF

    Reply

  41. They are the Wales's children and NOT the Welsh children… they are British not Welsh and their parents are the Prince & Princess of Wales .

    I'm guessing that English isn't your native language so I hope that you find this helpful and useful for future references. As there is a difference between what you referred to them as … "the Welsh children" and what their actually called.. "the Wales's – the Wales's children". The Wales's children also use "Wales" as their surname in school just as their father and uncle did. So it's Prince George Wales, Princess Charlotte Wales & Prince Louis Wales… As I mentioned when Prince William was in school & in the military he was William Wales and his brother was Harry Wales. You can find pictures of them in their military outfits with the name Wales on their outfits as their surname.

    Just like Harry's children… "IF" they exist… "IF" they're biologically related to Harry…AND "IF" they were born from Harry's legally wedded wife's body then those children technically could use Sussex as their last name or Mountbatten Windsor.

    Since I question if they even truly exist & aren't fitments of Harry's wife's imagination.
    Where every real world sighting of the *alleged children were either dolls (within the 1st year or other people's children). Where virtually every picture has been other people's family pictures that they have taken & falsely used & claimed as their own pictures or they've taken pictures with other people's children and submitted them as their own family pictures…
    All examples are simply fraudulent, false & just LIES.
    *example: a black & white picture of Archie & Me-again at the beach when he was around 2 years old was actually Brynn Gringos & her son Gavin Gringos… Once it was proven & became Globally known the Sussex's removed the picture from their site. There were a few pictures of Gavin Gringos that were fraudulently passed off as Archie that were also removed. There's been several pictures of August Brooksbank that have recently been released & passed off as Archie. The badly A.I manufactured Christmas picture appears to have used a recent picture of August Brooksbank as a reference when making it's rendering or the picture was cobbled together and filled in with A.I generated renderings…😂 just recalling the image of Harry makes me laugh… He's squatting in an unnatural position as if he's going to the washroom, he has 6 fingers on one hand, his beard is gone, his mouth is deformed and has has a black hole in the corner of his mouth and in the corner of one eye just for starters…His wife is like the 70's/80's toy called Stretch Armstrong..😂 her feet are pointing one direction her torso is pointed in another, she has a football linebackers shoulders, and her arm appears twice as long as it should be, Archie's legs & feet bend unnaturally and his feet/ankles at impossible angles.. magically Lili's (3) the same size & height as Archie(5)

    Reply

Leave a Comment