LONG ISLAND AUDIT FOUND GUILTY TRIAL, EPISODE #4 THE SEAN REYES SAGA CONTINUES



FAIR USE DISCLAIMER:
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for β€œfair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.

[This content is for educational purposes only. Familia Tv, does not condone the actions of those we portray in our videos. In fact, we despise it…and that is why we bring public awareness to these people.]

VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfJnTgFE56XSy7GIlTXkclg/join

source

31 thoughts on “LONG ISLAND AUDIT FOUND GUILTY TRIAL, EPISODE #4 THE SEAN REYES SAGA CONTINUES”

  1. Do all witnesses get a order of protection from the court against Sean who has a history of harassing people and trespassing? We all know this crazy will harass and do anything to badger these people who witnessed against Sean who will if he gos free from charges go after these good people and or his followers will .

    Reply
  2. Thanks for this. I'm so excited to watch how Sean wasted his money for lawyers. Tit for tat, especially how much this whole charade cost the city of Danbury. Guess we won't see him file the federal lawsuit against the lawyer, as Reyes claimed multiple times. Gotta lie to fraudit!!

    Reply
  3. Rather than go about it the way Sean does, a "journalist" perhaps would go there, follow all the requirements, document the visit, report the experience in his "media outlet", arrange interviews with city officials, question them on the discrepancies of their policies vs the law, provide the interview answers to the same outlet, and also to the City Council to advise them, with the expectation they will effect change to ensure legally compliant policies are in effect. Or, follow Sean's method of being a pompous douche to everyone. One gets ad cents and subscriber donations. The other may only result in appropriate policy changes.

    Reply
  4. Why have security if they can't touch you? In the UK our security officers can physically remove you without the fear of being sued. All this palaver because one fraudster prick, was removed from a building for disrupting a workplace. Resources being wasted on the council, the layers love it because they are getting paid, frauditors love it for publicity.πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Reply
  5. "It is your job to protect sensitive work from being recorded" Sean and every other Frauditor
    "We are, by keeping you and your camera's OUT of our offices" Every city, state, and federal building in the country
    "But the First Amendment says we get to be @$$holes and record anyone and anything we can see. Even when we wander out of public and into offices" LIA
    "That is why we are having to pass new laws to keep you from seeing work material of a private nature you idiots!" officials.

    Reply
  6. LOL – the camera doesn't lie Sean. Love using his own recording and stupidity against him. Even his high paid lawyers couldn't get past his videoing his own stupidity.
    Phil, the great guard, was not charged and was not fired.

    Reply
  7. You are mistaken little fella low IQ do not know anything about our civil rights we the PEOPLE can keep our SO-CALLED Public SERVANTS in check and make sure they are doing their jobs correctly!!!!!!

    Reply
  8. It wasn't her job to ensure the policies were posted on her door, given that (a) all visitors were given that info before they were given a visitor's badge, and (b) she controls her office, and she told him he was not allowed to film her customers.

    Reply
  9. Processing of documents (including documents in the form of data) includes any time the documents are read, written, moved, printed, saved, altered, retrieved, etc. When someone hands a document to a clerk, that is processing. When the clerk receives it, that is processing. When the clerk transfers data into a system, that is processing. He used the term "handed for processing," as if handing it over is not processing; he's wrong. Any touching, physical or by a system, is technically processing.

    Reply
  10. geez almighty what’s wrong with this attorney of this guy with all his questions he is asking the lady employee such as did he bust the door πŸšͺ down?, and anything else revolving around all the customers and their private information being private and the fact he shows up to the entire place and just filming the employees who are filming over the friggin counter where they’re just peacefully working without having a careless, greedy nobody armed with a stupid camera πŸ“Έ or a iPhone πŸ“² and he started this irritating court crap πŸ’© just for u tube clicks & views, content and fame bro 😎 this guy is just extremely low, sad 😒, and pathetic with all his bullshit Steve like what friggin lick πŸ‘… of good πŸ‘πŸ» difference does it even make sir?

    Reply
  11. oh dude I have big seriously painful πŸ˜– headache πŸ€• with these stupid, desperate first amendment auditors with their unwanted dumb ass court hearings when they don’t get their own way inside all these private business πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’Ό establishments can never, ever get a friggin decent life & job you guys it is a very important rule with in the book of the 1st πŸ₯‡ amendment constitution for these losers an absolutely huge πŸ˜’ to hell for all these zero-leveled nobodies to the truth Steve, the same goes for each of their own idiot brainwashed attorneys.

    Reply

Leave a Comment