LIVE Reaction: DEBATE Liberal vs. Conservative Muslims Jubilee



#muslimskeptic #roundtable #haqiqatjou

Daniel Haqiqatjou and the MuslimSkeptic team celebrate a new milestone! They also react to liberal Muslims and other viral videos.

Fight anti-Muslim censorship and join: https://t.me/haqiqatjou
Support our work: https://muslimskeptic.com/contribute/

source

37 thoughts on “LIVE Reaction: DEBATE Liberal vs. Conservative Muslims Jubilee”

  1. Congratulations MS and the team ❤

    Please do more research on why Taliban have banned girl from going to school and university

    Best would be to talk to someone who is from Afghanistan and knows the situation, history and anthropology

    Talibans are a very tribal group and have a more tribal mentality than Islamic. The hardcore Pashtun tribes don’t treat woman as it’s prescribed by Quran or sunnah rather they go beyond as it’s a cultural thing prior to Islam

    Some of them do not believe in education at all let alone education of woman. There is news that they have even suspended some girls madrasah studies

    So it’s nothing to do with the content of teaching which may have been engineered by the invaders in the past 20 years

    The girls schools have always been separate to boys even in the past 20 years and no men are ever allowed in girls schools

    I’m an Afghan and we really don’t understand why they banned girls completely. People are happy to change the curriculum or anything just to be able to have girls getting education. That is absolutely no problem. And girls are wearing niqab so no problem with uniform

    Brothers please look into this matter with more details and don’t just approve every political action from these guys

    Jazakallah khair ❤

    Reply
  2. I saw lot tweets from Israeli activities like hananya naftali, Emily scharder, arsen ostrovsky these guys are tweet about Iran government hijab view, crying for liberals and hijab is against muslim women… Its oppressing
    Look like they are working harder against these things…
    Year ago i saw a video a" women who removing her hijab and she said she is free'…

    Reply
  3. May Allah curse the people who try to change Islam according to their desires.
    May Allah bless people like the Muslim Skeptic team.
    Aameen

    1:23:00 Br Hud is making complete sense and I have always tried to prove the exact same points to the niqabi sisters on Instagram but they just label me as Haram Police. I also believe that sisters must not try to film themselves. What are they even trying it for? Posting beautiful pictures of themselves and trying to give dawah while being in a beautiful abaya and hijab or niqab. (It only becomes the medium of tempting men. I also believe that when boys upload pictures with the intention of attracting girls they are also sinful for that, any sensible Muslim with agree with me.) There are even some girls who are reciting Qur'an in beautiful voices, and the voice of a woman is a part of her sattar. Even the women's voice must be covered i.e they must not speak to non mehram men, a woman is not even allowed to correct the imam rather they are ordered to clap to let the imam know that he has recited wrong. So, there's no way it is allowed for them to recite in a beautiful voice. Some are reciting with their hair open, or giving dawah while they are without Hijab. I don't know what is happening with this generation. I am 19 and I already feel like a 100 year old who can't understand the current time. May Allah guide us all.

    2:40:00 I would love to be a slave of any of you whether Br Daniel, Br Abu Lut, Br Hud, Br Tariq or Br Mahmud. I know everyone of you would treat me very well as you know how to treat a slave as per the Islamic teachings.

    Reply
  4. Brother Daniel wanted to tell u about your discussion with Mr uthman about deboandis. Mr uthman is right about that we can't work with deobandis first we have to correct them show them all their mistakes in the aqeeda and if they accept it. Then we work together with them but if they don't then they are out of fold of Islam. Is that understood.

    How can u say we can work together with them acknowledging that we have differences that's same like working with omar suleiman we know they are sellouts.

    Reply
  5. Brother Daniel wanted to tell u about your discussion with Mr uthman about deboandis. Mr uthman is right about that we can't work with deobandis first we have to correct them show them all their mistakes in the aqeeda and if they accept it. Then we work together with them but if they don't then they are out of fold of Islam. Is that understood.

    How can u say we can work together with them acknowledging that we have differences that's same like working with omar suleiman we know they are sellouts.

    Reply
  6. Brother Daniel wanted to tell u about your discussion with Mr uthman about deboandis. Mr uthman is right about that we can't work with deobandis first we have to correct them show them all their mistakes in the aqeeda and if they accept it. Then we work together with them but if they don't then they are out of fold of Islam. Is that understood.

    How can u say we can work together with them acknowledging that we have differences that's same like working with omar suleiman we know they are sellouts.

    Reply
  7. Brother Daniel wanted to tell u about your discussion with Mr uthman about deboandis. Mr uthman is right about that we can't work with deobandis first we have to correct them show them all their mistakes in the aqeeda and if they accept it. Then we work together with them but if they don't then they are out of fold of Islam. Is that understood.

    How can u say we can work together with them acknowledging that we have differences that's same like working with omar suleiman we know they are sellouts.

    Reply
  8. Brother Daniel wanted to tell u about your discussion with Mr uthman about deboandis. Mr uthman is right about that we can't work with deobandis first we have to correct them show them all their mistakes in the aqeeda and if they accept it. Then we work together with them but if they don't then they are out of fold of Islam. Is that understood.

    How can u say we can work together with them acknowledging that we have differences that's same like working with omar suleiman we know they are sellouts.

    Reply
  9. وَمَا كَانَ لِمُؤْمِنٍ وَلَا مُؤْمِنَةٍ إِذَا قَضَى اللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ أَمْرًا أَن يَكُونَ لَهُمُ الْخِيَرَةُ مِنْ أَمْرِهِمْ ۗ وَمَن يَعْصِ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ فَقَدْ ضَلَّ ضَلَالًا مُّبِينًا (36) "سورة الأحزاب"

    Reply
  10. Daniel, you are absolutely destroying islam about islam promotes slavery. What are you saying??? Islam promotes free slaves through many means – major ir minor sins. You really need to do more reading.

    Reply
  11. I would say giving sadaqa and freeing a slave analogy is incorrect, because when you give sadaqa you are transferring property to someone less fortunate. However when you free a slave, you're not transferring the slave to a less fortunate owner. The slave becomes independent.

    Reply
  12. Allah has honored us with Islam, and if we seek honours in anything other than Islam, we will be humiliated.

    I think it summarize this whole Jubilee debate. The Liberals have begged for acceptance from liberals by selling out on their values, while the conservative muslims stood their ground. And in the end the comments are overwhelmingly supportive on the conservative side Al’hamdullilah.

    For sure the liberal ones feel deep in their fitrha that they humiliated themselves.

    May Allah guide them.

    Reply
  13. I remember a video of Zakir Naik in an interview he gave many years back. When he was asked about these so called categories like conservative muslim, cultural muslim, liberal etc, he outrightly dismissed the idea and said that there is nothing as such. And if you want to classify muslims then there are can be 2 types – practising muslims and non practising muslims

    Reply
  14. I bought the "Qawm Lut were actually rapists" argument because of what that queer lady said, with the "bal" conjunction (rather/on the contrary, used to negate the previous sentence's accusation) bit showing that Prophet Lut wasn't condemnding them for having gay desires, since that conjunction was used the same way in other ayat in the Quran. However, it was Daniel himself pointing out in one of his articles that Christians used a similar argument that made me rethink this stance, among other articles showing why acting on homosexual desires is forbidden and immoral.

    Was it possible that Qawm Lut were rapists? Maybe, Allah knows best. It's pretty clear that Prophet Lut would've still condemned them for approaching men with lust instead of women as that was what made them transgress all moral bounds.

    So, Daniel, if you read this, I want to say jazaakullah khayr for helping me realize this, and also for helping me purify my iman through some of the liberal talking points I've absorbed over the years.

    Reply
  15. To affirm the point Br. Hud made – it's not a problem that can be resolved with upgrading the niqab, honestly, Abu Lut is right in that people will seek the sitaris if they go up a notch. When one creates a culture where women are objects to be consumed, that mindset carries over no matter what the women look like, it's horrifying in an unprecedented way. Quite literally, the veil has become a mysterious temptation instead of the protective barrier it used to be. Hijabis and niqabis are free game to get catcalled on the street. Allah protect us…

    Reply
  16. @Abu Lut

    Just to correct you akhi: on minute 59mins and 47seconds you mention Dr Reza Pankhurst and his book the ‘Inevitable Caliphate’. He was not a member of Ikhwaanul Muslimeen. He was a member of Hizb ut Tahrir, the Islamic political party founded by Sheikh Taqiuddeen Nabhani RH.

    Reply
  17. I think the reason that the Niqabi identified as liberal isn’t that she believes in free-will and thus she just misunderstood the term… I think she meant in society free-will should be respected to the point the society is liberal. Hence she didn’t say Muslim women must wear the hijab. She’s liberal because she believes people should not be forced to live by Islamic standards

    Reply
  18. As far as I ever understood, the beard is not something bad but it’s also not something mandatory for men, it’s a sunnah, the hijab is a must for the woman, Allah mentions for the woman to cover herself in a specific manner.

    Reply
  19. (1:23:00) Brother, it's easily possible for one to feel attraction towards someone whom they have not even seen.
    The task of preventing that attraction is shared between men and women.
    Woman's part is her haya and hijab, but against a man who has no haya hijab will not have any effect.
    If you look long enough, you will find something you like. And that's by design and is a good thing in the right place.
    A healthy person no matter who he/she marries to should be able to get attracted to them no matter how they look, if the hijab was covering beauty, or if the hijab was covering a scar!

    Reply

Leave a Comment