Linda Burney compares Voice opposers to Trump fans



Sky News contributor Gary Hardgrave says 67 per cent of Australians are afraid to speak out on the Voice referendum over the fear of being labelled a racist.

“And we have Linda Burney coming up with this bizarre comparison to Donald Trump,” Mr Hardgrave told Sky News contributor Steve Price.

source

23 thoughts on “Linda Burney compares Voice opposers to Trump fans”

  1. Linda Burney one of Australia’s most entitled racists. (Hey Linda 1950’s White Australia called it wants its strategy back.)

    Linda Burney and a great many Australian politicians have been ‘truth telling’* for so long now they’ve lost any contact with principles and correctness.

    Linda Burney insulting Australia and Australian citizens under the protection of ‘truth telling’* for generations.

    Race should be as unimportant as hair colour.

    In the constitution, all Australians should have the same rights and should share the same responsibilities.

    Race has no place in the Australian constitution.

    Hey Linda it’s not racist to not want to be ‘welcomed to your own country.’ Its bloody reasonable.

    And every Australian including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander’s who values race above personal ability, and competence should be called out for the racist, bigoted, intolerant, and prejudiced di q head they are.

    Reply
  2. The 26th of January 1788 and in every year since in Australia is best factually described as “Rescue Day”.
    There is nothing more humiliating than a dingo trying to take control of dog kennel built for the dingo’s benefit when the dingo was not capable of building the dog kennel in the first place!
    If someone rescued me from a stale stagnant position of non evolution in which I had been stuck in for 40,000 years then I would be personally surprised if I could not experience any feelings of GRATITUDE?
    🇦🇺💯%

    Reply
  3. Those who will be voting NO are deplorables and domestic terrorists. Those who are voting YES are getting free drinks from Linda's favourite pub….How come this sheila always sounds p*ssed or brain-damaged?

    Reply
  4. Who will appoint Voice members ?
    How many will there be ?
    Will they be paid ?
    Will they have to prove they are at least 50% aboriginal ?
    Will ALL Australian citizens vote these Voice members in ?
    Will the current millionaire aboriginal activists be active in decision making ?
    Explain just how this Voice will benefit those people suffering sex abuse and physical violence .
    How will the Voice eradicate the victimhood mentally of the Aboriginal industry ?
    How much will this racially divisive Voice cost the Australian taxpayers ?
    Explain how this will unite Australians when what it actually does is bring about the death of equal citizenship
    Is $30 Billion annually insufficient for 3% of our population ?
    We are all Australians Albo , something you appear to forget
    Vote NO

    Reply
  5. I was speaking to a lady at the Dr's this morning who I asked "What's your view on the voice"? She was frightened to respond. When I said I was voting no she opened up and said she was too. She was frightened to comment less she be branded a rascist. We both commented it wasn't misinformation it was a blank cheque with no information!

    Reply
  6. Why don't you tell the truth You live different life in city then the rural First Nation people Wow nice to see you all dolled up We are having trouble putting food on table and heating to keep warm Silver spoon idiots just worry about your own pay packets 😢😢😢😢

    Reply
  7. This issue about the Voice to Parliament needs to be debated in terms of objectivity. Objectively indigenous Australians were recognised in the Constitution in 1967 through referendum. This Yes vote led to significant reforms and the creation of a number of agencies and later the Aboriginal Land Rights Act.

    Objectively this proposal for 2023 seeks to elevate indigenous access to parliament beyond that of other citizens. It seeks to do so on the premise that this will ‘close the gap’, where numerous programs and funding sources have previously and spectacularly failed.

    There is no articulated case of how this Voice will change what other measures have not. There is No articulated case for elevating parliamentary access on the basis of race. There is nothing of substance, and effectively a statement of faith the the Voice will improve the lot of indigenous Australians.

    Sorry – not seeing any reason to vote yes, and various reasons to vote no.

    By the way – aboriginal mob have done nothing to build public support on this issue – particularly given youth crime issues nationally, that total waste of space Senator Lidia Thorpe’s stormtrooper tactics, and Linda Burney stuttering and stumbling through all her speeches etc apparently of the same mental capacity as doddering old Joe Biden in the states.

    Reply
  8. Pearson Burney & Mayo all making great arguments for those “undecided” to VOTE NO.
    The more the yes campaign comes out with only proves to strengthen the resolve of the Australian public. This “voice” alway was, always has been, always will be about $$$.
    Remember this name:
    Thomas Mayo
    Black militant Labour communist union official
    He wrote the “rule-book” for the voice to parliament.
    Direct quotes:
    Punish politicians
    Abolish colonial institutions
    Pay the rent
    Pay reparations
    Pay compensation
    “There is nothing that we can do that is more powerful than building a First Nations voice, a black institution, a black political force to be reckoned with”.
    He plans to use “The Rule Book” to force the murderous powers that be – The Government – to bow down to the Black Voice.

    Reply
  9. A leading “Yes” campaigner for the Voice to Parliament hopes it will be a step towards getting non-Indigenous Aussies to “pay the rent” for living on Australian land. In a series of unearthed tweets from 2020, Thomas Mayo – who was a signatory of the Uluru Statement from the Heart – shared his vision of a new life if the Yes vote passes. He said a “Blak rep body” enshrined in the Constitution – as called for in the Uluru Statement – would have the “resources & structure needed to unite on the priorities we collectively determine.” “Reparations, land back, abolishing harmful colonial institutions, getting ALL our kids out of prisons & in to care, respect & integration of our laws & lore, speaking language, wages back – all the things we imagine when we demand,” he wrote. In response to someone calling for non-Indigenous Australians to “pay rent”, Mr Mayo said the way to do this was through a constitutionally enshrined representative body “that the politicians cannot ignore”.
    I feel sick. Please…. can we provide this information to the Australian public.

    Reply

Leave a Comment