JORDAN PETERSON | True Geordie Podcast #161



Jordan Peterson shares his insight on current social dilemmas, what life is like being a controversial figure in the media world, why he is hated by some people and much more.

📧 Business Email : [email protected]

📹 Main Channel : https://www.youtube.com/truegeordie

👑 TG2 Channel : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpLh6CawAd90bJ9tyDBovTg

⚽️ The Kick Off Channel : https://www.youtube.com/thekickoff

🐦 Twitter : https://twitter.com/TrueGeordieTG

📸 Instagram : https://instagram.com/TrueGeordieOfficial

source

22 thoughts on “JORDAN PETERSON | True Geordie Podcast #161”

  1. I love Jordan Peterson and his analogies but ngl I think he was a bit haphazard with them in this interview. Don’t get me wrong I get what he’s saying but when he was using the tiles one and mentioned the snakes it caught me completely off guard lol

    Reply
  2. I enjoy Jordan Petersons exploration of thought but not how black and white he can be in his conclusions, can come off as arrogant to not think that things can be more grey then he thinks, for example not everyone who considers a conspiracy theory is wilfully blind and stupid they may just be able to see through some bullshit and have a decent level of awareness but this wouldn’t be considered by Jordan become everyone in his eyes fits into certain categories that are black and white

    Reply
  3. The episode of X-Files season 11 called, 'Rm9sbG93ZXJz' was a fantastic depiction of when modes of centralized control can essentially make you a prisoner of automation. The lack of dialogue or speech was also powerful as it relied more on the events unfolding and that gave it a sense of added horror. It was also just funny.

    Reply
  4. On the "rights" topic I'd like to highlight the distinction between what may be called "positive" and "negative" rights.
    By way of example: the right not to be stolen from or murdered. This kind of right works by restricting what other people can do.
    On the other hand we have "rights" that work by forcing other people to do things. For example the right to food, housing, healthcare, internet etc. These kinds of "rights" entail forcing others to do things. Other people must be forced to work to guarantee these kinds. These kinds of rights require slavery to be guaranteed.
    These so called positive rights are not fit to be rights at all. They can never be guaranteed, and if they are guaranteed it requires slavery to do so.
    It seems to me force is legitimate to enforce negative rights which specify what people are not allowed to do, namely theft and murder. We dont force people to do anything. We use force merely to prevent or stop them from doing a very limited number of things.
    I don't think force is appropriate to enforce anything more than not being stolen from or murdered. Voluntary action ought to account for the rest. This can be in the form of taxation IF it is voluntary.

    Reply
  5. What is money?
    What is a price?
    Who controls what we use as money?
    What are the consequences?
    I recommend 2 fairly short pieces of writing:
    Frederik Bastiat's "The Law"
    Ludwig Von Mises "Bureaucracy"
    Both of these thinkers have many more of their insights encoded in other writings. Especially Bastiat has some very accessible fairly short essays. "The seen and the unseen" comes to mind as another very very very relevant. The problems these guys diagnose are supercharged because of the money we use and how it works, and how it makes us work.

    Reply
  6. Pity to see this. TKO is tarnished by association, therefore I must unsub. Hopefully the other more sensible hosts (Rory, Spencer & Adam) see sense and go their own way, before even worse and more ethically-challenged guests than Peterson turn up to this pod…

    Reply

Leave a Comment