Joe Rogan Just Announced a SHOCKING Discovery Under the Eye Of The Sahara Desert



In the heart of the unforgiving Sahara Desert lies a secret that has
remained hidden for millennia—a secret so profound, it could rewrite the
history books and challenge everything we thought we knew about our world. The Sahara Desert, stretching across a vast area of nearly 3.6 million
square miles, is an extraordinary place on Earth. This desert is so huge that it’s comparable in size to the United States, including Alaska and Hawaii. Located in northern Africa, it covers almost one-third of the entire African continent.

#saharadesert #eyeofthesahara #joerogan

source

11 thoughts on “Joe Rogan Just Announced a SHOCKING Discovery Under the Eye Of The Sahara Desert”

  1. Humanity's history will be revealed – our origin is from aliens from an advanced planet called Niburu. The aliens are called Anunakis. They came to earth to mine gold, they need it to save their ozone layer. They brought with them a slave species called Egigi to do the work. But the Egigis revolted. Then Anunakis used dna from earth's primates and merge with their dna to create HOMO SAPIENS. Human. They called the first humans ADAMU (Adam). They taught the early humans farming, maths, writing, and they built the pyramids and ancient monuments. Then after hundreds of thousands of years, humanity became too intelligent, advanced , one of the Anunaki gods called Enlil caused the flood to wipe humanity out. His brother Enki told one of the Sumerian kings (noah in bible) the flood is coming, taught him to build the Ark. Our creator in the bible are Anunakis "gods" . But spiritually there is a grander One True God that created everything.

    Reply
  2. As for the Richat segment, whether it's the geological remnants of an eroded volcanic dome or the weathered site of some astronomical impact from ancient times, none of that really matters to me. I find such things irrelevant as I believe the Richat structure possibly pre-existed even in ancient times. It may have merely been the inspiration, or perhaps even chosen as the foundation for a city such as Atlantis to sit upon. If that is the case then the origins of the Richat and how it came to be are indeed irrelevant. Because, when I consider any possibility for Atlantis to be based on something historically tangible instead of an allegory or even myth, the location of Richat and the geological features surrounding it all line up with Plato's dialogues regarding his descriptions of it. Like Arthur Conan Doyle's famous detective Sherlock Holmes, I'm a firm believer that when you have too many coincidences line up, they are no longer coincidences, but instead, they do indeed point to the truth of the matter.

    For those truly interested in this topic the following is in further support of Atlantis being elsewhere than the Atlantic, as the phrase Pillars of Herakles was originally a phrase pointing to a location that changes over time. Which would indicate the Atlantic was wrong all along.

    Regarding the Pillars of Herakles location not necessarily being at the Strait of Gibraltar, I found the following data from…

    Source: Atlantipedia

    Search: Pillars of Herakles

    Pindar 518-438 BC would appear to have considered that the PoH was a metaphor for the limits of physical prowess as well-established Greek geographical knowledge Olympian 3.43-45, a boundary that was never static for long. In 1778, Jean-Silvain Bailly was certain that the Pillars of Hercules were just “a name that denotes limits or boundaries.” 0926.2.293 More recently Professor Dag Øistein Endsjø, at the University of Oslo in Norway, has endorsed the idea that the ancient Greeks used the ‘Pillars of Heracles’ as a metaphor to express the limits of human endeavor and quotes the classicist, James S. Romm in support. In a sentence, the Pillars advanced along with extended geographical certainty.

    Isocrates 436-338 BC was an ancient Greek rhetorician and a contemporary of Plato. He wrote of Herakles setting up Pillars near Troy as a boundary marker, following the Trojan War Philip 5.112.

    Aristotle 385-322 BC Aristotle wrote that “outside the pillars of Heracles the sea is shallow owing to the mud, but calm, for it lies in a hollow.” This is not a description of the Atlantic that we know, which is not shallow, calm, or lying in a hollow and which he refers to as a sea; not an ocean.

    Eratosthenes 276-194 BC was thought by many to have been responsible for the fixing of the PoH at Gibraltar. In fact, in the early days of the compilation of Atlantipedia, I wrote that no writer prior to Eratosthenes had referred to the Pillars of Heracles being located at Gibraltar. This was wrong and was the result of a combination of hastily quoting Sergio Frau and badly paraphrasing a passage from George Sarantitis's book; How, from the times of Ephorus 405 BC, Plato, and Aristotle and until Eratosthenes 276 BC and Strabo 63 BC, did the Pillars migrate to Gibraltar?

    Pseudo-Scymnus c.140 BC placed the Pillars at Mainake thought to be modern Malaga. However, Spanuth cites from the same source a reference to a Northern Pillar in the land of the Frisians, as support for his North Sea Atlantis!

    Also in the Atlantic, there have been some speculative attempts to link the basaltic pillars at the Giant's Causeway in Northern Ireland and its counterpart across the sea in Scotland's Isle of Staffa with the PoH.

    Strabo 64 BC-23 AD, a Greek historian and geographer, noted that close to the Pillars there are two isles, one of which they call Hera's Island; moreover, there are some who call also these isles the Pillars. Bk.3, Chap.5 The two isles referred to as near the Pillars have never been identified; as there are no islands in or near the Strait at Gibraltar, but there are in the Sea of Marmara near the Bosporus, another location candidate!

    He also records that Alexander the Great built an altar and ‘Pillars of Heracles’ at the eastern limit of his Empire.

    Pliny the Elder 23/24-79 AD noted that in Sogdiana in modern Uzbekistan there was reputed to be an altar and ‘Pillars of Heracles’.

    Reginald Fessenden opted for the Caucasus noting The fact that Nebuchadnezzar, after reaching them in his northern expedition, next went to the north shore of the Black Sea and to Thrace; and that Hercules, coming back from the pillars with the cattle of Geryon, traversed the north shore of the Black Sea, see Megasthenes, quoted by Strabo and Herodotus, 4.8, puzzled the ancient geographers because they thought that the Pillars were at the straits of Gibraltar. And because they had overlooked the fact that the Phoenicians of Sidon had known that the Pillars had been lost and that the Phoenicians had sent out four expeditions to look for them but had reached no conclusion from these expeditions except that the straits of Gibraltar were not the true Pillars of Hercules. See Strabo, 2.5.

    Of course, the fact that the true Pillars of Hercules were in the north Caucasus isthmus explains why both Nebuchadnezzar and Hercules, after leaving the Pillars, came next to the shores of the Black Sea.

    Tacitus 55-120 AD, the renowned Latin historian, in his Germania chap.34, clearly states that it was believed that the Pillars of Hercules were located near the Rhine in the territory of the Frisians. So the Romans either thought that the Pillars were not situated at Gibraltar or could exist at more than one location at the same time.

    I contend that although there is no doubt that the term Pillars of Herakles was eventually applied to the Gibraltar region, it was also applied to a few stops as the Greeks stuttered their way there from the Aegean along the Mediterranean. Ronald H. Fritze, an ardent Atlantis skeptic, noted in his Invented Knowledge [709.23] While at various times the geography of the ancient Greeks applied the name of Pillars of Hercules to other locations in the Aegean region, in this case, Plato is quite explicit that he means the Pillars of Hercules that are now known as the Straits of Gibraltar. So if it can be accepted that the PoH was applied to several locations in the Aegean by the Greeks, why not also to other places as they gradually expanded westward?

    Reply

Leave a Comment