Joe Rogan: Archeologists Are LYING About ANCIENT Technology Used

by



FREE Alpha Brain Trial! – https://onnit.sjv.io/qnrxJY
FREE Shroom Tech® Sport Trial – https://onnit.sjv.io/GjrVxE
Onnit Affiliated ^

Joe Rogan, Jimmy Corsetti & Ben van Kerkwyk talk about how archeologists are denying the fact that there were more advanced technology used years ago to build large structures like the pyramids.

Jimmy Corsetti is the independent researcher behind “Bright Insight” where he talks about ancient mysteries and theories about lost civilizations and what happened to them. Ben van Kerkwyk is an Australian researcher, writer and content creator. He produces the UnchartedX.com website and UnchartedX youtube channel and podcast, producing long-form documentaries on various topics dealing with ancient mysteries

Clip taken from JRE #1928, w/ Jimmy Corsetti & Ben van Kerkwyk
Host: Joe Rogan
Guest: Jimmy Corsetti & Ben van Kerkwyk

source

50 thoughts on “Joe Rogan: Archeologists Are LYING About ANCIENT Technology Used”

  2. H.H.O.
    Sympathetic Resonance
    The Pyramids are Tapped Down into the Water Table
    Tesla Based his Towers Off what he saw and deduced from the pyramids.. he said so
    What are the Egyptian "bowls"
    Tjey look like Hydraulic Pumpd or Tap One amd See how it Sounds.

    Reply

  4. Joe , Look at a Bus and try to see How You would Move it By Yourself.
    Included Turning it around , Flipping it Over and Standing it on End.
    By Yourself.
    A Guy in Florida , built a Palace cutting Corel by Himself with pieces 10 tons in Weight all by Himself with a Model T Wrecking Yard for Parts to Use.
    A Stone Mason just laugh at Your UFO building the Pyramids , Notice none of the UFO books ask a Stone Mason anything.
    Some Science that is when You don't ask the Standard Questions which is all Science Is , 6 Questions Seeking the Truth.

    Reply

  7. There's something etched in one of the walls that shows a electrical cord to a light bulb, could be a lazer cutter? Or they figured out how to make a float field, an anti gravity field that makes things float? Or both?
    They had something we didn't besides brain's.😮

    Reply

  8. You take a masonry bit and try to drill into concrete with a standard drill and you're just kind of polishing the concrete. Put that same bit in a hammer drill, and it's making a bigger impact.

    Reply

  9. I mean sure. There's things like the Bagdad battery the ancient people didn't know what they had. And theres some real world science that suggests some sword manufacturing techniques actually had a byproduct of producing carbon nanotubes. Again. They didn't know what they had. Ancient Egyptians may have stumbled on a process that mimics certain manufacturing techniques or materials we know of today. But these are byproducts. And they likely didn't know what they had.

    Thinking this is evidence for some industrialized machine or some space alien thing is just absolutely absurd. I think you don't give the people the credit that's due. They were hard workers. I don't doubt they made amazing inventions for the time. That made the work easier. But they were hard workers. I take a look at sculpture. These people had the ability to turn stone into anything. And they could do it with simple tools. I just find it hard to believe. The type of technology you suggest would leave traces. So.. go find some. Just because you can't think of how they could have done it without aliens or advanced tech…. maybe they were more creative than you. They payed attention to the world around them more than we do now.

    Reply

  10. Modern man and engineering and technology are not as smart or advanced as we think we are. Some things From past civilizations Will never be solved. Ancient civilizations had skills and knowledge and experience that modern society Will never solve period period period period period. Ancient civilizations were very knowledgeable intelligent and resourceful. Good luck uncovering how many ancient civilizations were built.

    Reply

  11. Modern man and engineering and technology are not as smart or advanced as we think we are. Some things From past civilizations Will never be solved. Ancient civilizations had skills and knowledge and experience that modern society Will never solve period period period period period. Ancient civilizations were very knowledgeable intelligent and resourceful. Good luck uncovering how many ancient civilizations were built.

    Reply

  12. Dude’s probably never seen someone draw a perfect circle. People want to ascribe to aliens (or some such nonsense) what humans for thousands of years have been able to do. It’s more exciting than living on-site and digging with a small trowel and brush. Ugh

    Reply

  15. hey I remember in this one book it said angels walked with man….probably totally unrelated…..hey i mean if i knew there was gunna be a flood and wipe away my perceived greatness and i had a super tiny dick and wanted to be remembered id probably do something like build pyramids and carve pretend stories in rock about how awesome i was……

    Reply

  17. There's natural resources noone mentions. Anything volcanic in nature. What can score, cut & smooth anything? Diamonds were used in stone construction & art. Diamonds are only beautiful after being cut/smoothed. Cutting/shaping diamonds, for jewelry, is a whole other technology, yet, we still use them in construction. And! Where's would the proof be? Well, it's all just dust in the wind 🙂 also..if the truth about ancient civs came out..how much would countries lose in tourism revenue? 😉

    Reply

  20. Look up the story of the Coral Castle. This old dude by himself moved hunks of coral wearing several tons by himself he said he had discovered the secrets of the pyramids and never shared it with anyone and died with the secret it's an amazing fucking story

    Reply

  23. I wish these kind of fruitbats wouldn't have took over the History Channel. And he's insane or just incompetent to think ancient Rulers would have allowed ANYTHING other then perfection when having a Large Permanent(as far as they know) copy of their face produced, also most art of human faces are of real people,but going back eons the "fantasy" art(not real faces) like Gods or angels,basically any face painted from the mind of the artist is almost always Perfectly symmetrical,because Symmetry has been considered beautiful forever. And the easiest way to paint a face from nothing is to do half first,then copy-in the reverse side,boom Symmetry is achieved.

    Reply

  26. What if we already became space faring people with great building and infrastructure and while we were away exploring the universe the earth had a catastrophic event and when we returned we sore what humanity had become and thought hell no .so aliens are us and we were once a extremely sophisticated society and now we are ……….this 😢

    Reply

  28. As a kid I used to think of archaeology as something so pure, simply the search for the truth, free of all the money and power dynamics that have stained so many other fields of science and information…

    Reply

  29. I think many heiroglyphs are largely technical specs and wiring diagrams. You look at a computer schematic and tell me how egyptians would relate those functions when people living in the field scratch their heads looking at some of those coded symbols. What would an egyptian toxic, shock, or radioactive warning sign look like?

    Reply

  31. I challenge the scientific/archeological community to do DNA testing on these so called "statues" ~
    I bout guarantee that they come out mitochondrial in most cases, if not all of them, with the exception of the ones with a different DNA type, that would be more reptilian or whatever else.
    I bet they're mudfossils.
    But nobody wants to have that* conversation.🤷‍♀️🤨😬💯

    Reply

  32. Excellent interview Joe
    Very Cool To Hear A Fellow Aussie Speak about this
    AND Show How
    ACADEMIC EGO IS IN PLAY
    the arrogance of well read /studied archeologists to not be open to new ideas is outrageous and dangerous to think that they are the only people that can understand the very objects that they study 😊

    Reply

  41. Fossil evidence suggests humans have been around since time-immemorial. Since that implies humans like Einstein and da Vinci would have also lived back then, is there any evidence of advanced human civilization? It’s a legitimate question and the answer is yes, such evidence does exist. Human civilizations could have risen and fallen many times over those many millions of years. So there may have been times in the distant past when civilizations like ours existed, and long periods of time when the human populations were smaller and lived in ways we would consider more primitive. So what would happen to the remains of the advanced civilizations like ours during the times of depopulation? We tend to assume that our skyscrapers and machines are very durable and long lasting. But this is not really true. Scientists who study these things understand that many of our monuments and machines will not last very long when exposed to the uncontrolled forces of nature. Only a minuscule portion of the earth has been excavated also.

    https://stacker.com/environment/how-long-it-takes-50-common-items-decompose

    This scientific truth has been brought home to a wider audience by television documentaries like Life After People, which aired on the History channel early in 2008. It turned out to be the most popular show ever on History. A similar program, called Aftermath: Population Zero, aired on the National Geographic channel in March 2008. The premise of these programs is simple. Let’s assume that human beings disappear from the earth today. What would happen to the physical remains of our civilization over time, starting from day one? Author Alan Weisman has also explored what would happen to the physical remains of our civilization if human beings were to suddenly become extinct in his book The World Without Us, which generated its own television special.

    From these sources we get a picture like this: Within about seventy-five years, most machines, such as cars and airplanes and boats, except perhaps in some very dry places, would be corroded beyond recognition. Plants would start growing in the cities. Without maintenance, roads would be covered with plants, and would be broken up, and gradually disappear. Unchecked wildfires would burn through many towns and cities. Because dams and levees would no longer be maintained, they would gradually break down. Thus there would be flooding of many cities, especially in coastal cities and cities on rivers and streams. That would include most cities. Wooden houses, if not burned by fires, would be consumed by rot or termites. Plant growth and rains would gradually destroy masonry and bricks. Paints that protect steel structures would wear away, exposing the metal to oxidation. The steel frames of concrete buildings would gradually rust away. Within a few hundred years, bridges would fall into the rivers. Skyscrapers would collapse into rubble, which would be subjected to floods, fires, earthquakes, as well as degradation by plant life. By about 1,000 years from now, our huge urban centers like New York would be unrecognizable. Heaps of rubble would be covered by plant life and forests. There would be almost no signs of a past human civilization. After 10,000 years, the only sign of a human presence might be stone structures like the Pyramids of Giza. Hurricanes, typhoons, and tornadoes will remove most signs of human habitation from huge areas of the earth, as will earthquakes and volcanoes. New ice ages will also scour the earth with glaciers. Extend these processes over tens or hundreds of millions of years, and we can understand that not many visible signs of our high-tech civilization would be left.

    This may be one reason why much of the evidence for extreme human antiquity that I talk about in my book Forbidden Archeology consists of stone tools and things of that sort. Of course there are some exceptions. For example, in 1871, William E. Du- bois, a researcher for the Smithsonian Institution, reported on a copper coinlike object found in a well boring at Lawn Ridge in Marshall County in the state of Illinois in the United States. The round copper object had on one side two human figures and an inscription in an unknown language. The report was published in Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society (1871, vol. 12, no. 86, pp. 224–228). The case is also discussed in the book Sparks from a Geologist’s Hammer (1881) by A. Winchell. From these sources, my research assistant and I were able to get to the drilling record of the well boring, which consisted of a list of the strata the boring had gone through to get to the level that yielded the coinlike object, at about 114 feet. At that level the deposits are of clay, which could explain why the coin was preserved.

    A coating of clay would protect the coin from oxidation. We wrote a letter to the Illinois State Geological Survey, inquiring about the age of the deposits at that depth of 114 feet. We were informed that the deposits were from the Yarmouthian Interglacial period, between 200,000 and 400,000 years ago. This is quite astonishing, because according to the currently dominant theories, humans like us did not exist at that time. Actually, the first coins are supposed to have been used in the eighth century in Lydia, in what is now Turkey. Similar coins are supposed to have come into use around the same time in China and the Indus Valley. But the discovery at Lawn Ridge shows that coins may have been used long before that, as much as 400,000 years ago. Of course, coins presuppose a civilization with a developed economy and government.

    But it is a fact that many of the cases I talk about are from the category of stone tools. I should point out that stone tools can be just as much a sign of a human presence as a computer. For example, the stone mortars and pestles found in Early Eocene formations (about 50 million years old) in the California gold mines are a kind of artifact attributed by archeologists only to humans like us, not any kind of apeman. These discoveries were originally reported to the scientific world by Dr. Josiah D. Whitney, the state geologist of California, in his monograph The Auriferous Gravels of the Sierra Nevada of California, published by Harvard University’s Museum of Comparative Zoology in 1880. And some of the artifacts are still in the collection of the Museum of Anthropology of the University of California at Berkeley.

    But let’s imagine that 50 million years ago, people in California were using not only stone mortars and pestles but also laptop computers, skyscraper buildings, and automobiles. What would remain after 50 million years? Not much. Most of our high-tech stuff would not survive very well over the course of millions of years. Stone tools are much more likely to survive the ravages of time.

    So even though humans with high technology may have been existing at the same time as more primitive people 50 million years ago, only the stone tools may have survived.

    I am not saying that there would be no signs at all of high-tech civilizations in the record of the rocks, but I am saying they might not be as common or as easily recognizable as we might think. A few years ago I was monitoring some exchanges by archeologists on an internet discussion group. I did not participate in the conversation myself. They were discussing this question: What if there were a human civilization like ours that existed 100 million years ago? What signs of it would we see today? They concluded we would not see very much, perhaps just some thin bands of multicolored gravel. And we would not even notice them unless we were specifically looking for such things.

    This is a big problem. Scientists tend to find what they are looking for. And today not very many scientists are actually looking for evidence of high-tech civilizations in the distant past. So one purpose of my work is to inspire a new generation of paleontologists, and geologists to start looking for these things. If they did, then perhaps when they encountered some strange looking band of gravel, they might test the materials, and perhaps find mineral compounds that do not occur naturally, thus showing the existence of ancient people who had the technology to make such compounds.

    I look at the evidence presented in my book Forbidden Archeology as just the beginning. In any case, questions about the level of human civilization, be it high or low, presuppose the existence of human beings. Whether we look for evidence of high-tech human civilizations or low-tech human civilizations, the first thing is that human beings had to be there. And at least I have shown that humans like us have existed for hundreds of millions of years on earth. As for all the details about their levels of technological advancement over those vast periods of time, that is a topic for further research.

    Excerpt From
    The Forbidden Archeologist
    Michael A. Cremo

    Hare Krishna

    Reply

  47. If someone's hypothesis is that advanced technology was used in the building of the pyramids and other megalithic strutures, it is their responsibility to find the evidence for it. If there are valid criticisms or alternate explanations for your results, it is then up to you to go back and keep looking for better evidence instead of making up a conspiracy about people not wanting you to find the truth.

    Reply

Leave a Comment