Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom – re:View



Okay, Doomer! Mike and Rich embark on an epic adventure without leaving the comfort of their chairs! On the eve of the release of the “final” Indiana Jones film “Dials of Density”, Mike and Rich decide to look back at the least loved film of the trilogy, Temple of Doom (Rich was the least loved child of 18 children) Listen to these two morons talk about a movie from 1984! Four decades before all of you were born. They can’t possibly be THAT stupid right? Why aren’t they posting TikTok prank videos? Or on Insta filming car wrecks and laughing at bum fights? Or making a true crime podcast. Or giving their cash away in piles like The Beast. Why don’t they argue about things on Twitter with total strangers? Does Rich Evans wear diapers? YES! What would possess these two to talk about something old and pointless. Well, kids it’s because they love moopies. They really love old moopies and make mud pies in their pants.

source

28 thoughts on “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom – re:View”

  1. Indiana jones temple of doom is a stupid and Idiotic Film. How do Christians (Americans and British people) feel if I say that, the Jesus is a god of destruction and Evil. well let me guess, You guys feel disturbed right? Yes, we feel the same as Hindus, when someone call KALI MAA as EVIL. KALI maa is the mother of all the creation itself. However everything they said in the film is a big lie. KALI means time, Albert Einstein can explain better what KALI MAA is. Steven Spielberg Might be a great director. He is going through the hard times (Break Up with his girlfriend) during this film. that's reason he didn't done well research on India while doing this film. Or else British Queen might had given him huge amounts of money 💵 to degrade Rich Indian Culture.

    Reply
  2. This movie has two major flaws. Two comic reliefs and both annoying. The constant screaming Kate Capshaw and the always overacting, overpaced Key Hue Quan. Had he left those out it would be the best Indiana.

    Reply
  3. "[John Williams] may have been the only one who cared about making the movie," says Mike about Temple of Doom. I think that's going to apply to Dial of Destiny as well, Mike!

    Reply
  4. Dan Akroyd got 3 tickets: Indy, Short Round and his friend who got shot. So I believe, Short Round was indeed the driver on purpose. And the William scream is in the bridge scene aswell.

    Reply
  5. I grew up with Indiana Johnes, temple of doom from a fantastic Trilogy is a very well cinematographed film. I keep enjoying this movie more when and still think its very underrated.
    I don´t think that scenes like the menu would be possible in modern films, but it has very creative decisions with a very dark tone and a fantastic ending.

    Reply
  6. Imagine Indiana Jones Arctic Adventure, how white that movie would be. Not racially but physically. Nothing but snow. Like the first 20 minutes of Empire Strikes Back but for 2 and a half hours. Your eyes would be permanently affected.

    Reply
  7. Temple of Doom was always the most memorable to me. It made quite an impression seeing that as a kid. People act like Raiders is high art and ToD is somehow lesser but I don't see the distinction. Raiders is just as silly as Temple of Doom, but I prefer this one. Without ToD you just have Indiana Jones suffering from Star Wars syndrome where you can only tell the same exact story again and again – oh the Nazis are trying to get their hands on some powerful ancient relic, and Indy must intervene! It's not that interesting. The death cult was the coolest and most pulpy, which is kinda the point of the franchise.

    Reply
  8. you should make a review about "Hook!" There are so many little easter eggs in that movie. I noticed only the last time I watched it that there was something odd with the pirate who gets thrown in the chest with the scorpions, I paused it and rewatched it and I understood it was a woman! I did never notice that for 35 years. And also Phil Collins playing the police detective… It's amazing how many little things Spielberg hides in his movies.

    Reply

Leave a Comment