How World War 2 Would Have Ended if Atomic Bombs Were Never Dropped



The atomic bombs put an end to World War 2 in a dramatic fashion, but how would things have played out if those 2 nuclear bombs were never dropped on Japan? Check out today’s epic new video to see an alternate version of how things would have played out during WWII if things didn’t go nuclear!

Correction:
1:55 The correct names are Fat Man and Little Boy

🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO THE INFOGRAPHICS SHOW ► https://www.youtube.com/c/theinfographicsshowOFFICIAL?sub_confirmation=1

🔖 MY SOCIAL PAGES
TikTok ► https://www.tiktok.com/@theinfographicsshow
Discord ► https://discord.gg/theinfographicsshow
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/TheInfographicsShow
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/TheInfoShow

💭 Find more interesting stuff on:
https://www.theinfographicsshow.com

📝 SOURCES:https://pastebin.com/k0grPWZw

All videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted.

source

24 thoughts on “How World War 2 Would Have Ended if Atomic Bombs Were Never Dropped”

  1. The criticism of using these weapons is reasonable logically, but the ultimate decision for the US leadership is in a war they were provoked into the responsibility for them is to preserve the life’s of there countrymen and the results after validate they made the right decisions. There is no justification to launch a ground invasion costing hundreds of thousands of American soliders lives when they could end the war preserving the life’s of the Americans who volunteered to serve.

    And the real fact is it saved the lives of the Japanese as well. The Americans would of had to slaughter the vast majority of the entire population in the invasion.

    Reply
  2. As usual with American propaganda there was no mention of the key role Russia played in the Japanese surrender.
    This piece of propaganda pushes the idea that the use of atomic bombs against Japanese civilians was a very reluctant move by the Americans, yet, just a few years later they were to drop more bombs on North Korea than they dropped on Japan and killing by their own estimate 20% of the entire population even though most of the fighting was contained to the border area between the north and south of Korea. And bear in mind, this was done to a country that had never attacked America and was not at war with America.

    Reply
  3. The only relevant argument is if the Soviet attack alone was enough to tip the scales in favor of surrender. I don't think it was, but the argument is some of the Japanese were deluded into thinking the Soviets would side with them against the West.

    I wouldn't weigh the lives of the Japanese very highly against the suffering of the Koreans, Chinese, and POWs suffering for even a single additional day under the Japanese boot.

    If Truman had launched Operation Olympic with the atomic bombs unused he would have been hanged.

    Reply
  4. The war was winding down when we dropped the nukes. We had already run most of their forces back to the Japanese mainland. If we had continued traditional war they likely would have surrendered within 1-2 years. They would have run out of enough soldiers to continue fighting by then.

    Reply
  5. At 8:10 It said that Japanese kamikaze rarely missed their target was not true only about 1 in 4 hit their intended target (i did a bit more reasearch and it states that it was only about 11% not 1 in 4 but that was going against the U.S.S Missouri) sorry

    Reply
  6. yall got money for war but can feed the needy and the poor, yall research the invention secrecy act of 1951, operation paperclip, operation Northwoods, mk ultra, operation sea spray, operation mocking, these disgusting operation events have drastically drifted us off course from becoming a true peaceful human civilization, we homosapiens need to know what's truly going on and so if you wish to accept ignorance, it's okay just know you will be left behind with your ego and emotions unless you accept what's truly going on, share aswell maybe someone will do something about it that has true influence.

    Reply
  7. I believe if they're never dropped in WW2, and the world doesn't see their power, any number of the near nuclear showdowns during the cold war eventually goes hot and we see the end of the world. To that end, dropping the bombs on Japan was a logically sound and dare I say positive outcome.

    Reply
  8. it's a myth that Japan surrendered from the nuclear bombings. it wasn't known how dangerous they were and firebombing had already been brutal. they only surrendered when the soviets swallowed up their island chain and made landfall on a mainland.

    Reply
  9. I think the bombing of the cities was necessary. Yes it took thousands of innocent lives. But it prevented a LOT more combat and civilian deaths.

    I believe that the amount of people that lost their lives in the bombings would pale in comparison to the amount of deaths caused by ruthless combat and carpet bombing residential areas if the war would drag on for a longer period of time.

    Reply

Leave a Comment