How War in Ukraine Proves US Military Would DOMINATE Russian Military



The war in Ukraine has proven one major thing to be true; the Russian military is weaker than everyone believed. Check out today’s new epic video that breaks down why the Russian military is having a difficult time with Ukraine and would be entirely dominated by the US military in a head-to-head conflict.

🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO THE INFOGRAPHICS SHOW ► https://www.youtube.com/c/theinfographicsshowOFFICIAL?sub_confirmation=1

🔖 MY SOCIAL PAGES
TikTok ► https://www.tiktok.com/@theinfographicsshow
Discord ► https://discord.gg/theinfoshow
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/TheInfographicsShow
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/TheInfoShow

💭 Find more interesting stuff on:
https://www.theinfographicsshow.com

📝 SOURCES:https://pastebin.com/8d8cB896

All videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted.

Our Secret Weapon for growing on YouTube ➼ https://vidiq.com/theinfoshow/

source

36 thoughts on “How War in Ukraine Proves US Military Would DOMINATE Russian Military”

  1. To be fair at the moment it appears any reasonably well equipped modern armed forces would dominate Russia, pretty much all of Western Europe, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Israel, Canada, Japan, South Korea.
    Reasonably well equipped, modern forces that can throw a lot of bodies at it like China and India would decimate Russia.
    Well equipped, bleeding edge and large numbers like USA would be like Muhammad Ali punching a toddler with osteoporosis.
    The only thing that is preventing the wholesale destruction of Russia is its nuclear arsenal and what would happen to it if the Russian State disintegrated. As bad as Russia is a fractured nuclear state that's selling off warheads to the highest bidder or just loosing them is worse.

    Reply
  2. Russia has an asset that America can never match: practically unlimited manpower. Throwing masses of expendable troops into the meat grinder until the enemy basically ran out of ammunition and manpower had been successful during the Napoleonic wars and WW2. The downside is that this over-reliance on a seemingly endless supply of fresh meat that may have spoiled Russia into thinking that she didn't have to rush in to improving strategy, tactics, doctrine, and technology. Adding corruption, weakened economy, and rigidity into this mix guarantees that Russia will continue to play catch-up with America for decades to come.

    Reply
  3. Can't have it both ways. Can't have the Russian officers getting killed on the front because they are replacing the role of NCO's and then complain that they are cowardly hiding far behind the front lines…

    Reply
  4. I'm sure it would, after WW II, US and its coalition only fought the war where they had overwhelming advantage. I can't say the same when its only US and US alone against Russia

    Reply
  5. WAR; WAR and WAR,, I hope that these two nations and these two peoples understand that cooperation is the only way forward,there has to be an understanding sooner or later this has to stop

    Reply
  6. hmmm.. a war against the US ( tech and weapons ) is clearly a US Win. I think the biggest test is How much Casualties it can take before its population breaks ( abit like Vietnam ) just an interesting thought.

    Reply
  7. This is a masterpiece in delusion of grandeur. The reality is that everybody has seen how inferior USA armies and equipment are to Russia. The proof is other countries are now openly going against the USA with no fear of military repurcusion: Saudi Arabia and UAE just joined the BRICS, Iran has increased hostile manoeuvres in the Gulf of Hormuz, India is doing whatever it wants to, Brazil has refused to follow sanction and allowed military cooperation with China, even small fish like South Africa and Niger are openly cooperating with Russia. Clearly nobody fears the "mighty" USA any more. Btw how are you going to win a war when you can't even produce enough artillery shells ( Reason why the USA had to resort to sending cluster rounds) and have subpar air defense system (can't defend against massive missile strikes) whilst the opposition has a superior air defense system (reason why NATO couldn't enforce a no fly zone as it usually does in its proxy wars).

    Reply
  8. I’m currently an infantryman in an IBCT (Infantry Brigade Combat Team) and I can confirm the lethality and combat effectiveness of a BCT. The amount of coordination, logistics, and planning that goes in brigade-level exercises is also quite unfathomable.

    Reply
  9. The u.s. couldn't even handle actual cavemen. And now mojados at the border.
    Lets not forget about the race riots by the democrats.
    America will never win a war again.
    Don't bother asking war vets of the old guard to help, we're disavowed…

    Reply
  10. This is so laughable it's hilarious. Half the world is supplying ukraine with weapons developed specifically to combat russia and they are still doing nothing. And russia hasn't even been competent in this war.

    Reply
  11. Anyone in the West complaining of giving aid to Ukraine is not seeing the money and lives we're saving of our own. It's aid to a sovereign nation and great R&D. 2 years ago we were slightly worried about a war with Russia. Now we're confident in knowing a conventional war, would take less than the 2 weeks it took to take Iraq. Who are still using the same tanks we mopped the floor with 30 years ago LOL And a nuclear war isn't even that "scary" anymore. Russia couldn't keep up with maintenance of trucks FFS Those stockpiled Soviet "nukes" are more dangerous to the people launching them. Russia may wipe out half the country in their first salvo but fortunately, it'll be half of Russia they blow up. While US, France, UK, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Turkiye, Belgium and Netherlands decimate the other half. No one's coming to Russia's defense. The Chinese will be headed to Eastern Russia in hazmat/NBC suits putting up oil derricks when they see the flash from Russia.

    I typed that last sentence speaking in "Dale Gribble"

    Reply

Leave a Comment