How Trump Wants to End the War in Ukraine | @VisualPolitikEN



Join the VisualPolitik community and support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/VisualPolitik

Donald Trump returns to the White House. That means the war in Ukraine is going to change. Trump has promised to stop the war. How does he plan to do it? We’ll tell you on VisualPolitik.

#Ukraine #Trump #Russia

source

28 thoughts on “How Trump Wants to End the War in Ukraine | @VisualPolitikEN”

  1. Any plan of Zelensky is covertly to save himself & his co-horts, period. Zelensky never had any strstegic mindset to think about the sufferings of Ukrainians but bow to the wishes of his US / NATO masters & business interests.

    Reply
  2. Zelenskyy went along with Biden in ANNOUNCING that Ukraine was going to JOIN NATO.
    This violated a standing TREATY signed by Russia, Ukraine and the US.
    Biden and Zelenskyy were both warned that this was a RED LINE that Putin could NOT allow because it would mean US nukes ON Russia's border.
    To make sure Zelenskyy and Biden knew Putin was serious, Russia moved tanks and troops to the Ukraine border.
    Biden's response, in a demonstration of his arrogance, ego and his trademark stupidity, stated publicly that Ukraine could do 'whatever it wanted', whether Russia liked it or not.
    That is when Russia invaded in order to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO.

    Reply
  3. You are delusional if you think trump will lose reputation due to Russian advances. He is not the president of Ukraine. He serves only and for the american people. The only reputation lost is Zelensky who refuses to negotiate a peace to end the war. Terrible analysis here.

    Reply
  4. I am an American and a supporter of Trump. I agree that this war needs to end, but “I” do not support Ukraine giving up land for peace. The Crimea issue is off the table, but Russia cannot be allowed keep an inch of Ukrainian soil they had stolen since 2022. If Russia refuses to surrender seized land, then America AND!!! All of EUROPE, should armed the Ukrainians to the teeth with our best OFFENSIVE weapons and allow the Ukrainians to take the fight to the Russians, deep into their territory. I know that Europeans hate when Americans remind them of that little 2% funding issue within NATO, but now, only after this Russian invasion, has most, not all, but most European NATO countries are now at 2%… AFTER decades of ignoring their responsibility within NATO. Yes, it’s good that most of Europe has met the 2% goal, but please don’t act like every is fine since this has only happened within the last 1-2 years… Excluding Poland, who is clearly taking the Russian threat seriously. France, Germany, and the United Kingdom need to get motivated and follow Poland’s lead. The days of the US doing all the heavy lifting are coming to an end and as an American, that fully supports NATO, the Europeans “Peace Dividends” are officially over, so do your part in defending YOUR OWN SOIL… While you can.

    Reply
  5. I think once again this view do not see it, that Putin and the Russian people will do what ever it take to end this war on there terms, and if it mean going to war with the US and the West to end it once and for all, so be it?

    Reply
  6. Well, here's the thing. Obviously, Ukraine wants to join NATO, as doing so will place them under the umbrella of our protection, which is understandable. However, on the flip side, we(members of NATO) have to analyze things from the standpoint of "How will this benefit us?". If Ukraine joining NATO only benefits Ukraine, and opens up ALL of NATO to the risk of invasion, being that they directly border a seemingly hostile state(Russia in this case), then that's not a very positive prospect to consider. In other words, if Ukraine is really wanting to join NATO, then they're going to have to make an offer that is suitable to compensate for, or even counteract the risk that them joining would open up the whole of NATO to. Because what we all have to keep in mind is that the higher the risk of NATO being attacked is, the higher the likelihood of WW3 breaking out. So we have to be VERY vigilant and shrewd in order to prevent such a turn of events at all possible costs, even if it means sacrificing the few to save the many. In all reality, it would be far more beneficial to NOT allow Ukraine to join NATO, but rather maintain friendly relations, and perhaps RE-establish an American embassy and consulate with some small military presence to act as a deterrent for any hostile forces. Which, to be clear, is the very same setup that we had prior the the week leadership of the Biden administration that had evacuated the embassy, and consulate, as well as withdrew all U.S. military forces from Ukrain when Russia began to move it's forces toward their border. Given that if any hostile force(In this case, Russian forces) were to harm a US troop or NATO troop, then it would be an Article 5 violation, which would constitute an act of war against NATO, so Biden pulling out of Ukraine in the first place only gave Putin the green light to attack. A strong leader in the White House would have never allowed that to happen in the first place.

    P.S. – 4:35 The bulk of Ukraine's military power, being their available arsenal, was essentially given to them by multiple nations throughout Europe, but predominantly the U.S., and what was given, can also be taken away. Furthermore, it's no secret that the majority of their soldiers are draftees, and while some may remain active military after the war ends, there's no guarantee that the majority of them will. In other words, from a military standpoint, Ukraine has absolutely 0 room for any negotiation. Their primary bargaining chip would be their available resources that they have to barter with, however, I don't see that as being enough of an incentive to allow them to join NATO, as we can easily negotiate any number of favorable dealings that would give us access to their resources without opening up NATO to the risk that them joining would present.

    Reply
  7. Rumor has it that in order to fulfill his promise to end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours (good luck with that), Trump want to propose a peace plan so lopsided in Russia’s favor that Ukraine will turn it down flat, which will give Trump the alibi to walk out of Ukraine and blame it for it; a genious machiavellian plan. Now, it’s only a theory, so we’ll have to wait and see what happens after January 20. But, let’s get real, Trump doesn’t give a fuck about foreign polcy (Israel and China excepted) and international relations. And Ukraine doesn’t fit in the “America First” framework, so I can’t see him sticking with Ukraine, and with the EU by extension, for the long haul.

    Reply
  8. a refugee is perfectly happy to live in a tent providing he has enough food and security for his survival and does not represent a problem at all. our misfortune is entirely of our own making when deciding, that he must live like all of us.

    Reply
  9. Here's my take: There was a security agreement signed when Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons. Tell Putin you now recognized this deal. Take all restrictions off use of nuclear weapons. Pull a couple of hundred F16s either from the boneyard or being prepped for it, then give the green light for any F16 pilots who have left US service to go fly them (and ground crew BTW). There are plenty of pilots that would jump high to get a chance to actually go up against actual Russians (not 3rd world) in combat. Putin no longer has a WW1 world to fight in. Then tell Zelenski he has support for a given time and no more. They will settle.

    Reply
  10. All this is based on presumption that russia is looking for a peaceful solution but moscow stands to gain more by continuing the war. They will ultimately capture more oblasts and make sure Ukraine does not exist as a country to be used by the west as a pawn against moscow. This whole debacle was such a waste of lives and infrastructure just for the sake of a worthless nato membership.

    Reply

Leave a Comment