How SpaceX & NASA Plan To Establish The First Moon Base!



How SpaceX & NASA Plan To Establish The First Moon Base!

Get Early Access and Discount Codes to The Tesla Space & Space Race merch store by signing up here: https://shop.theteslaspace.com

Last video: New 2023 Tesla Model Y Update Is Here!
https://youtu.be/aZCDY8TmvOk

► Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/theteslaspace
► Join Our Discord Server: https://discord.gg/zfMNSnuRQN
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeMcDx6-rOq_RlKSPehk2tQ
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: https://www.theteslaspace.com

Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJjAIBWeY022ZNj_Cp_6wAw?sub_confirmation=1

Welcome to the Tesla Space, where we share the latest news, rumors, and insights into all things Tesla, Space X, Elon Musk, and the future! We’ll be showing you all of the new details around the Tesla Model 3 2023, Tesla Model Y 2023, along with the Tesla Cybertruck when it finally arrives, it’s already ordered!

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/TheTeslaSpace
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheTeslaSpace

Business Email: [email protected]

#Tesla #TheTeslaSpace #Elon

source

45 thoughts on “How SpaceX & NASA Plan To Establish The First Moon Base!”

  1. If they had time, the end is here. The thing they need is a automated solar power brick maker a machine that uses a ROV to collect rocks and turn them into bricks by using emp to liquify and mold and then track them in a way to create a airtight container.

    Reply
  2. Hay NASA,. Please focus on what you do best, building SCIENCE payloads! Let someone else (Space X) build the hardware to get the science package into space and where ever you are going, IE The Moon, Mars Jupter ETC. and as to the refuling of Starship, if one could manufacture your rocket fuel on the Moon . And then, just ship it from the Moon to Earth orbit wher the Starship would be waiting.
    PLEASE KILL/CANCLE the white elephant known as SLS Rocket!!!

    Reply
  3. Consider the following:
    MOON AND MARS MISSIONS: Need to put robots on the Moon and Mars that possibly have 4 legs that are expandable and 4 arms that are expandable. They could built habitats for the robots including having robots to help fix and take care of other robots. Then those robots could build habitats for other species, including eventually humans.

    Reply
  4. Living in a deathtrap bubble on the moon is a massive waste of resources. Considering we are destroying our planet and there is so much poverty and homelessness, those resources are clearly needed elsewhere. We're so intent on living on another planet that we forget to take care of the one we have; which by the way will be the only one we ever have.

    Reply
  5. Why don't they simply launch a 10 KG test rocket to the moon ? They could make a whole bunch quickly and test different moon landing configurations quickly. Before doing that they could simulate the whole darn process inside a computer. I think they should land a rescue ship on the moon, before they land the manned ship on the moon, to help improve return safety options.

    Reply
  6. No confidence that SpaceX can get this done without either going bankrupt or sabotaging Artemis to make them wait until the SuperFueler can be built, which in and of itself is a huge, no, massive risk. NASA would be stupid to put all their eggs in that basket, but we need two. Our only hope is that Blue gets it done on time to rescue the schedule.

    Reply
  7. I think if space x and nasa would just take an old shuttle refit it with all new technology attach it to space x's rockets and launch them all together to get back to the moon. Elon can launch separate rockets with fuel and other supplys to meet up at the half way point to the moon. Between both companies and all their supporters they can make that plan happen.

    Reply
  8. Absolutely ZERO chance that ANY Starship design will EVER orbit the moon, let alone land on it.
    Not gonna happen.
    Why? Because Starship is a piece of garbage design which will RUD until the design changes very dramatically.

    Reply
  9. Are they really going to make habitats that look like male genitalia like in the thumbnail? Cuz I think people would take them way more seriously if they didn’t. 😐

    Reply
  10. I think Artemis will make a huge change in about a year. Starship will carry the crew and cargo from Earth to the moon and return to land on Earth. They've been working on the SLS for over 10 years. SpaceX will pass them in another year. SLS costs Billions per launch, and Starship costs millions. A huge Difference. Falcon9 costs about 50 million and Starship will cut that by a lot.

    Reply
  11. Key aspect: Elon Musk "Near future" = 5 to 10 years away. As of today Starship has been in development starting in 2009(Sources: Spaceflight101) with the beginning of the Raptor engine that's 14 yrs so far and still no orbital starship, Space X iterative development process is not fast but extremely slow compared to the development of the Space shuttle from paper (1969) to first flight and landing on earth (1981) 12 yrs. Saturn V took 8yrs from paper to landing on the moon. It will take Space X 20 to 25 yrs to do the same thing. It took them 13 yrs (2002 beginning of the merlin 1a engine to 2015) before the first Falcon 9 successfully landing on earth my bet is the moon by 2030 and Mars by 2040. Musk will be 68 yo.

    Reply
  12. WHY NOT HOUSE PEOPLE ON EARTH BEFORE WE BUILD HOUSES ON THE MOON?
    FFS it seems pretty simple but people either don't know or don't care about the homeless when we spend money on wars and space exploration when people have to sleep on the sidewalk…

    Reply
  13. I'd like to see a moon base composed of 100 or so geological majors to take and advance drill cores of the moon''s surface. This could be of great interest and enthusiasm for grade school and older person's. There is a great deal of "Flash Gordon" results pushed by space research, but geophysics is exciting in itself depending on the results. 100 graduates geologic students operating on the moon would uncover a great prosper higher achievements of education to everyone.. This is a project worth funding and supporting.

    Reply
  14. I'm interested in StarShip 2.0 that has 8 times the internal volume of the current StarShip. StarShip 2.0 is a ship that can carry 200 science and engineering personnel comfortably with all the Star Trek equipment and redundancy to make it worth their efforts. With that compliment of crew including a doctor, nurse and a dentist along with the most well equipped pharmacy ever created to support a 3 year exploration. Star Ship 1.0 is really good for working out what a to do with a human space ship and going relatively short distances to the moon and staying there. Like super oil carriers bigger is better for transporting. You really do what a crew size that allows for a great deal human maintenance and support.

    Reply
  15. We visit the moon , we do NOT live there. We can't survive in 0.11G. Ask Mark Kelley about living in micro gravity for more than.6 months. So a moon base with humans on it all the time can only work in very short rotations.

    Reply

Leave a Comment