How Putin failed to achieve his military aims in Ukraine by satellite | Sean Bell & Philip Ingram



The war in Ukraine was expected to last several days, two years later, the conflict is still ongoing. Military analyst Sean Bell and intelligence expert Philip Ingram deep dive into the key battles that have taken place since 2022, and reveal why they believe Putin has failed to achieve his military aims.

๐Ÿ“ป Listen to Times Radio โ€“ https://www.thetimes.co.uk/radio

๐Ÿ“ Subscribe to our channel โ€“ http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTjDhFuGXlhx9Us0gq0VK2w?sub_confirmation=1

๐Ÿ—ž Subscribe to The Times https://www.thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/radio-3for3/

๐Ÿ“ฒ Get the free Times Radio app https://www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-to-listen-to-times-radio/app

source

25 thoughts on “How Putin failed to achieve his military aims in Ukraine by satellite | Sean Bell & Philip Ingram”

  1. Western propaganda again , putin is a top leader and as all the western leaders outsmarted. He ainโ€™t even began on Ukraine and the clown Zelensky yet. The idiots in the west need to keep their noses out of this proxy war or they will suffer badly

    Reply
  2. Here a year later those sanctions have trouble being chrusing. Putin 1 – Nato 0, Now Trump will winn a 2nd term lefthanded and save us from nuclear war. The peace summit was a farce. So it will be over at christmas.

    Reply
  3. The problem is that West ca. Ot brsakaway from classical combined arms philosophy which devasted Ukranian capacity to reposte against new military matrix deployed by Russians. In keepi g with theur goals speled out by Putin. WEST kept drawing wrong inferences and op analyses. Western tactics , weapon. Sysate.s and first line replenish.ent of heavy weapons failed completely .maj gen IA

    Reply
  4. Reminds me of when the British tactic of colums and lines against American hit and run and hide tactics in the first independence war ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿฆ…โญ๏ธ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ

    Reply
  5. Reading the first proposals of Ukraine to have independence after the Tsarist overthrow. Moscow wouldnโ€™t agree unless donbas and the coast remained under russian control.
    We can also note the special importance of Russian sea power at crimean ports for over 200 yrs. No matter how kind a gesture, and it appears they sweetened the lease deal as far as possible, they lost the lease. therefore they simply went for war.

    Reply
  6. Yes absolutely your correct. Ukraine is now total wrecked, economy collapsed, over half miliion Ukranian soldiers dead, infrastructures and power source are destroyed, resupply systems no where to found. They are blasted to pieces along the way. This is the face of the winner as explained here. Facinating analysis.

    Reply

Leave a Comment