How Does Russia's New Stealth Bomber Stack Up Against the US Raider || Tu-160 vs B-21



Speed vs brains, power vs stealth- the Russia Tu-160 vs the American B-21 Raider- which bomber is truly supreme? Check out today’s epic new video to see who truly rules the skies as we compare airforce capabilities between Russia and the US.

🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO THE INFOGRAPHICS SHOW ► https://www.youtube.com/c/theinfographicsshowOFFICIAL?sub_confirmation=1

🔖 MY SOCIAL PAGES
TikTok ► https://www.tiktok.com/@theinfographicsshow
Discord ► https://discord.gg/theinfoshow
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/TheInfographicsShow
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/TheInfoShow

💭 Find more interesting stuff on:
https://www.theinfographicsshow.com

📝 SOURCES:https://pastebin.com/NTLZBai0

All videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted.

Our Secret Weapon for growing on YouTube ➼ https://vidiq.com/theinfoshow/

source

25 thoughts on “How Does Russia's New Stealth Bomber Stack Up Against the US Raider || Tu-160 vs B-21”

  1. Stealth bomber is such a useless concept. It boggles my mind why people still buying all this "stealth technology" BS. It's such a waste of money, it makes aircraft forbiddingly expensive to construct and operate. Has B-2 ever penetrated a dense air defence? No! They've only been used AFTER all air defences have been suppressed already – and for those missions it's not better than an old B-52. What's really needed is a reliable working horse, which could launch strategic hypersonic or cruise missiles and wouldn't be too expensive to operate or even to lose -and here Tu-160 beats B-21 fair and square. Even B-52 beats it – I can bet right now it will still do all the job up to 2050 while B-21 will be sitting in garage. Leave those "surgical stealth missions" to drones and missiles.

    Reply
  2. The B-21 doesn't exist… Imagine how badly you'd rip into Russia if it only showed the nose of a place and refused to give any other information on it.

    This is laughable. I'm not pro-Russia in the slightest but there's no point bragging about nothing and haven't 0 evidence to back it up.
    The eagle is well and truly balding and made of paper it seems.

    Reply

Leave a Comment