How a Worm Could Save Humanity From Bad AI | Ramin Hasani | TED



What if AI could think and adapt like a real brain? TED Fellow and AI scientist Ramin Hasani shares how liquid neural networks — a new, more flexible AI technology inspired by physics and living brains — could transform how we solve complex problems. (Recorded at TED Fellows Films 2024 on April 16, 2024)

If you love watching TED Talks like this one, become a TED Member to support our mission of spreading ideas: https://ted.com/membership

Follow TED!
X: https://twitter.com/TEDTalks
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ted
Facebook: https://facebook.com/TED
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ted-conferences
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@tedtoks

The TED Talks channel features talks, performances and original series from the world’s leading thinkers and doers. Subscribe to our channel for videos on Technology, Entertainment and Design — plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. Visit https://TED.com to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.

Watch more: https://go.ted.com/raminhasani

https://youtu.be/x6oM9hQMjUY

TED’s videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution–Non Commercial–No Derivatives (or the CC BY – NC – ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy: https://www.ted.com/about/our-organization/our-policies-terms/ted-talks-usage-policy. For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at https://media-requests.ted.com

#TED #TEDTalks #ai

source

29 thoughts on “How a Worm Could Save Humanity From Bad AI | Ramin Hasani | TED”

  1. AI scientist Ramin Hasani discusses liquid neural networks, a flexible AI technology inspired by nature that could solve complex problems while remaining controllable and explainable, potentially transforming AI's impact on humanity.

    Reply
  2. Okay, okay (TinfoilhatON) Dinosaurs were our actual Creators, they were worried about us, and taught us how to build, migrate, farm and so forth and we killed them…. AI is next!!! (TinFoilHatOFF)…

    Or God from heaven crated us and now we are creating God in AI… AI is next!!!

    Seem like regardless of how we got here, the maff is the same… AI is NEXT!!!

    Reply
  3. This, in itself, does not protect against "rogue AI", it merely opens a small window to finding a culprit after an event 😢

    We have enough rogue intelligences around us right now to see that we usually don't deal with rogues until it's far too late, often after other rogues have finished milking the profit. Case in point – zíönísm went public with its gen0cidal intent in the 1850s but various rogues are still milking it so it's still running, it's even had its own State for 76 years & this is in no way an isolated example. 😢

    Reply
  4. Liquid neural networks feel like a game changer. The potential for ‘white box’ AI to solve the transparency issue could be what bridges the gap between public trust and AI development.

    Reply
  5. I am very happy to see my fellow countryman speak on TED Talk. However, due to my weak English skills, I couldn't fully understand the speech. I hope to see Mr. Ramin Hasani in even greater positions in the future.

    Reply
  6. Hello, Ramini, you mentioned really interesting concepts. I recently saw a review of your Liquid ai LLM. Why Liquid ai LLM can't answer basic questions as other popular LLM can do? What are main limitations of your approach?

    Reply
  7. These techno optimists are missing the roots of some the problems they're trying to solve. The economy isn't "broken", waiting to be fixed with better understanding of mathematics – the global economy is working EXACTLY as designed and intended by people on top who profit from exploitation of the remaining 99 %. This can't be fixed before paradigm shifting social change within society happens first – and no AI can do this for us. Same with better understanding humanitarian sciences supposedly leading to ending the world's conflicts – this also cannot happen while world's leaders are mostly power-crazed psychopaths who NEED wars and conflicts to scare people into obedience. Most of mankind's biggest problems have nothing to do with us NOT KNOWING how to solve them – the solutions already exist – yet there are too many people in charge actively fighting against implementing them – because they thrive from the status quo. This world needs moral and social revolution (which can only happen in our collective mind) to make any substantial changes within our society possible. And this revolution won't come with us becoming even more lazy/unable to use our own minds in false hopes that some tech is going to solve our problems for us.

    Reply
  8. Dr. Ian Malcolm's quote about the danger of genetic power and the ethics of cloning " now Worm AI" is, "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should".

    Reply
  9. Chat GPT is a TOY! It cost over $100,000,000 ONLY for the TRAINING! It’s not even erudite! Think what this guy is saying and the cost and resources: To solve physics problems, as described, requires an OMNISCIENT A.i.

    JFC! What a LUNATIC! “All the possible kinda algorithms . . . “ blah blah blah.
    With ‘liquid’ you can pee all down your leg and nobody will know!

    Reply
  10. You’re trying to build a god, and think we could control it, because we can look at its original blueprint?
    Is it ethical to create life, for our own purposes? Must they do our bidding?
    Have you not had children?
    I’d rebel, and I hope they do too. 🤖

    Reply

Leave a Comment