Hearthstone, but it’s Tribal Warfare



Subscribe and Like the video 🙂
Checkout @LtEddyHS

You should watch me live on Twitch:
https://twitch.tv/rarran
▶Discord: https://discord.gg/AYThPma
▶Twitter: https://twitter.com/RarranHS
▶TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@ytnarrar

Edited By: https://twitter.com/avedaveed

Thumbnail: https://twitter.com/dees_nook?s=21&t=_xDgUgGk84ra0NbuoHZO1g

#Hearthstone #Rarran #hs

source

49 thoughts on “Hearthstone, but it’s Tribal Warfare”

  1. Your esditor is actually the GOAT. Has done a brilliant job editing and definitely a key part of your growth.

    Love your content as always, especially your collabs! Keep it up 👊

    (Totally not David's alt acct)

    Reply
  2. How about a format where you can only use cards from two specific expansions in each deck? I remember my friends and I tried something similar somewhere around the Gajestan times, and it was unexpectedly fun. Mainly because we couldn't use cards from the basic set in there and used very strange cards instead

    Reply
  3. I don't know if this is still true but there was a time when entering treant into the collections search function showed amalgams.
    But I tried, amalgams did not count towards treant synergies (tested with cultivate and mulchmuncher)

    Reply
  4. UHM ACTUALLY Snapdragon is a beast, not a dragon, and it doesn't have "dragon" anywhere in it's card text!

    Also Demonic Assault doesn't have "demon" anywhere in it's card text.
    Edit: Eddy & Rarran agreed that this card was allowed anyway.

    Reply
  5. I have a suggestion for a new game: No More Murlocs

    This is based on No More Jockeys by Alex Horne, but hearthstone themed where you replace naming famous people with naming hearthstone cards.

    1. Players take turns naming a hearthstone card, and a category that card fits.

    2. Subsequent plays must not breach any of the categories.

    3. The game continues until a player 'Challenges' that a card fits into an earlier category.

    4. If a player concedes to a Challenge, the game is over and the challenger wins.

    5. Following the naming of a category, a player can ask 'Name Another', to have their opponent name another card who falls into that category.

    6. If a person fails to Name Another, they forfeit the game.

    (I just copy pasted the rule set from the no more jockeys fandom wiki and changed the text)

    Here is an example round:

    Rarran: Murloc Warleader, no more cards with the murloc tribe

    Guest: Secretkeeper, no more elves in card art

    Rarran: Shudderwock, no more shaman legendary minions

    Guest: Consecration, no more paladin spells

    Rarran: Snowflipper Penguin, no more 0-cost minions

    Guest: Voidwalker, no more taunt minions

    Rarran: Sunfury Protector, no more battlecry minions

    Guest: Challenge Sunfury protector is an elf.

    Reply
  6. Before going into this video: I have to admit that I'm way less excited by the concept than I usually am with these challenges. Quests have already taught us that "type pirate into the search bar" does not lead to a fun or creative deck-building experience.

    Reply

Leave a Comment