Hawker Siddeley Nimrod: The Phoenix With Clipped Wings



Thanks to Keeps for sponsoring this video! Head to https://keeps.com/MegaProjects to get 50% off your first Keeps order.

Got a beard? Good. I’ve got something for you: http://beardblaze.com

Simon’s Social Media:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SimonWhistler
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/simonwhistler/

This video is #sponsored by Keeps.

Love content? Check out Simon’s other YouTube Channels:

Biographics: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClnDI2sdehVm1zm_LmUHsjQ
Geographics: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHKRfxkMTqiiv4pF99qGKIw
Warographics: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9h8BDcXwkhZtnqoQJ7PggA
SideProjects: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3Wn3dABlgESm8Bzn8Vamgg
Into The Shadows: https://www.youtube.com/c/IntotheShadows
TopTenz: https://www.youtube.com/user/toptenznet
Today I Found Out: https://www.youtube.com/user/TodayIFoundOut
Highlight History: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnb-VTwBHEV3gtiB9di9DZQ
Business Blaze: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYY5GWf7MHFJ6DZeHreoXgw
Casual Criminalist: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheCasualCriminalist
Decoding the Unknown: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZdWrz8pF6B5Y_c6Zi6pmdQ

source

40 thoughts on “Hawker Siddeley Nimrod: The Phoenix With Clipped Wings”

  1. The Nimrod wasn't on 24hr Patrol. A lot of the time Norwegian P3s would be up overnight but not the Nimrod. I thought you might have covered the crashes too. The Nimrod was also used in the Alexander Kielland disaster. I was on duty that night in RCC Pitreavie Castle. That aside, another great video. Thanks for uploading.

    Reply
  2. I know people who were involved with MR4A. To entirely blame the government is unfair. The fact you did a Nimrod ep without mentioning Haddon-Cave report is a little odd. Nimrod was cheap initially because they were death traps. Contracts written with no accountability and the RAFs attitude to safety at the time was laughable which led to the deaths of 14 people. BAE won the contract for MR4A and there were actions going on would make your toes curl: the aircraft were/would have been bigger death traps.

    Cancelling it without insuring an immediate replacement was insane though.

    Reply
  3. A new version of the Nimrod should be produced in collaboration with Boeing with recon and stand-off rolls in mind. It should be kept in a multi-role configuration and with weapons bays based on the B1-B design in my opinion. This would allow for the use of rotary launchers that could carry both conventional and nuclear depth charges as well as cruise missiles if tensions call for that level of deterrent.

    Reply
  4. Great video I used to watch them take of and land when I was a lot younger from Cornwall if my memory serves me right early 80s from Newquay I believe fantastic aircraft destroyed by our useless government !! Very sad 😔

    Reply
  5. On a random note: you mentioned wanting to feature the Burj Khalifa but had concerns about it due to the sheer number of videos about this building that already exist.

    So instead, why not feature the Taipei 101? It’s WAS the tallest building until the Burj Khalifa passed it (it’s currently 11th) and there aren’t nearly as many videos about it as there are about the Burj Khalifa. The countermeasures against typhoons, quakes, and bad soil built into the building would be a pretty interesting topic. Or the fact that it’s built on an active fault line (and has allegedly caused seismic activity to increase).

    Current world events might also add to the video’s appeal, with the CCP shooting all those fish around Taiwan with ballistic missiles and whatnot😂

    Reply
  6. Honestly whilst cancelling the MR4A Nimrod at the point they did was really stupid and left a huge hole in UK capabilities I've always thought they'd have been better putting the systems/equipment on an A320 (or A321) and benefiting from 30-40 years of aviation advances – potentially reinforcing the wings too. That would have led to a very real competitor for the Poseidon and potentially sales/joint project with other countries.

    Reply
  7. In 1985 I was moved from my post doing major servicing on Nimrod to a nearby base to perform a major servicing on a Shackleton. Because the training on piston engines in the RAF had stopped some 8 to 10 years earlier. . Now do do feel free to ask me about the AEW3. Perhaps about the main processor for the radar which was out of date before the ink was dry on the specification. Or maybe you'd like to know about the computer bank that wouldn't fit through the door? Usual story of politicians not saying what results they wanted but specifying what you had to make.

    Reply
  8. It’s funny, I had been working on Nimrod Mk2 for several years in the mid 2000’s and had never heard of the Mk4 AEW variant until one day, out in the Middle East, I ordered a ‘new’ parking brake handle. When I received the ‘new’ part in came wrapped in wax paper, with a tag attached stating the part was RTP (Reduce To Produce, the act of taking parts of aircraft being scrapped and putting them into the parts system as serviceable) from 1986! This part was as old as me and had been floating around the stores system for over 20 years!

    Reply
  9. Spent 11 years on two tours with these aircraft.
    As you mentioned, there are a lot of sorties and catches that these aircraft carried out with no public recognition, which was a shame, as they truly defended our shores and the other forces aligned with us.
    They most always won the Fincastle (Britain, Canada, Australian, and NZ) Award, due to the engines being inside the wing and jet powered (fastest on task and stealth ish) the submarines couldn't detect them as good.

    Reply
  10. I worked on the AEW Nimrod software suite – and we were also well ahead of the US software in signal analysis methodologies in my personal opinion. We were all devastated by the cancellation at the time.

    Reply
  11. A lot of the pictures you showed were of the R1 and not the MR2. The MRA4 was still based in a 1940s designed aircraft, there was also a number of known but not addressed issues (see HC report following 2006 crash). The posiden requires a lot less support and it shares the airframe with the E7, also operated by the RAF. The AEW system was riddled with bugs and AWCS operated by the US, NATO and French ment alot more interoperability with NATO to with some ac were declared to operate with. The RI repalcment gives a lot more room for mission crew, with the R1 always struggled with.

    Reply

Leave a Comment