'Hate it!' How will Prince Harry and Meghan Markle react to new lawsuit? | Palace Confidential



‘Hate it!’ How will Prince Harry and Meghan Markle react to new lawsuit | Palace Confidential. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle could face ‘awkward’ legal questions as part of a defamation case brought by Meghan’s half-sister, Samantha Markle that’s the view of the Daily Mail’s Diary Editor Richard Eden. Speaking on our royal talk show Palace Confidential, Eden said Harry and Meghan would ‘hate’ being ‘put on the spot’ after the lost in their attempts to get Samantha Markle’s case dismissed. ‘Certainly the questions will be awkward, I think that will be the purpose of Samantha Markle’s questions for them… and they will hate it,’ he tells the programme. ‘They love giving their video links for charity or whatever from their home in Montecito, but the last thing they want to do is to be put on the spot to answer some very difficult questions.’

0:00 Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, Zelensky and more on today’s Palace Confidential
0:28 Reaction to the shock revelations about Prince Harry and the ‘older woman’ from Spare!
2:30 Will Prince Harry think he did anything wrong in discussing Sasha Walpole?
4:26 Where were the close protection officers during all of Prince Harry’s escapades?
5:20 Reaction to the Meghan Markle lawsuit by Samantha Markle
6:59 ‘Questions will be awkward’ What could happen during a Meghan Markle and Prince Harry deposition?
8:40 The best Palace Confidential viewer comments! (Did yours get picked?)
10:07 A memoir?? What could Prince Andrew’s next steps be?
12:30 A Prince Andrew book vs Virginia Guiffre book?
14:12 ‘Clear message!’ Reaction to King Charles meeting President Zelensky
16:14 The importance of King Charles III’s latest engagements
18:39 ‘A king for all communities!’ The significance of King Charles III’s engagements

#PrinceHarry #MeghanMarkle #DailyMailRoyals #KingCharles #Royals #RoyalFamily #harryandmeghan #samanthamarkle

Subscribe to Richard Eden’s newsletter right here! https://bit.ly/3sdBOO6

source

50 thoughts on “'Hate it!' How will Prince Harry and Meghan Markle react to new lawsuit? | Palace Confidential”

  1. I hope Samantha's case goes live the public deserves to watch Megalier lie again ( jail time please 😅) … Megan Markle should never be allowed back into the UK again… as for Harry he can't be trusted !

    Reply
  2. Oh, WOW, you know nothing, so call reporters. You will say anything to keep your job. Do you remember how to be a real honest journalist? You are feed lies by the two PR palaces to discuss on your form. You can not write the next Royal Novels base on palaces sources. The sources of lies destroy another human who has done nothing to you or anyone in the UK. You show support to liars like Samantha Markle and Backstabbing William. Accurate reporters search for the facts that support the truth. You support a Royal firm that takes from the taxpayers, and the Royal family returns little back to the community that supports their lifestyle. HEY ANDREW, GET A JOB. Why not discuss Andrew, a non-working royal wrap in SEX SCANDALS. HEY ANDREW, GET A JOB.

    Reply
  3. Do you really think Harry-Baby could regret anything? According to the interview with Pioers Morgan his Security protection was out the front of the pub waiting for him. After closing time they found him walking away from the pub down the road.

    Reply
  4. If Harry was 16 at the time, doesn't this make Sasha a paedophile? What is the age of consent? Why would this woman, Sasha, come out and name herself? Her name wasn't in Harry's book! Sasha is after a cheap grab for $$ & 5 seconds of fame (that hopefully lasts only as long, that 'quickie was out the back of the pub').

    Reply
  5. Harry never mentioned her name. She could have stayed in the shadows but no she wanted her 15mins of fame and outed herself. He didn't need to consult her about anything if he wasn't going to mention her name 🙄

    Reply
  6. A lot of nothing chat and gossip about nothing in this channel blagh and blagh. Don't they have more important issues to discuss in a troubled world coming from our media channels? Going over and over the old news forever and ever. I think it would be amazing if all media outlets would abstain and remain absolutely quiet about what these two (H and M) despicable human beings are doing in their lives. They probably think they are winning and becoming ever more famous by each passing day.

    Reply
  7. It's just so embarrassing to dredge up past actions..the poor woman wanted to crawl in her shoe talking about it! What a cringe moment! I feel for her! But it just shows his mental health 🤦

    Reply
  8. I doubt that Harry regrets any of the horrid things her wrote. He is narcissistic and thinks he can do no wrong. Everything is about him. He is a wretched person. He can’t say anything without lying. Maybe it is the drugs he is probably still taking messing with his reality.

    Reply
  9. Was there something said in reference to Markle hugging the graduate? It looked like the girl was leaning away from her, apparently didn’t want to hug. I seem to have missed the comments.

    Reply
  10. Sam Markle? More like Sam Harkle! Markle isn’t Sams real name. She changed her last name to cash in on Harry and Meghan. She makes money off of them then wants to sue them in court. Sams daughter has disowned her mother for all the LIES she says about Meghan in particular. It’s sites like the Daily Mail that PAY Sam for the lies. I prayer Sam loses BIG in Court. She deserves it along with that awful father Thomas Markle. Daily Mail wins either way. They sully Meghan’s name yet make money off of her. Disgusting and vile. Yep.

    Reply
  11. Yeah will see how they cope . Answering questions that . Megan don't know her own sister own father , own brother… living witch Megan.pinochios ….hope they put them in jail….hahaha

    Reply
  12. Why is no one in the media talking about Henry calling for an air strike on his father, the heir to the throne? Why are you all ignoring that? He should be charged with treason and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

    Reply

Leave a Comment