Gus dishes some Milford truths: Six Tackles with Gus – Episode 8 | NRL on Nine



Gus shares the facts surrounding Anthony Milford’s NRL exile, his views on the Marcelo Montoya suspension for a homophobic slur, and where to from here for Wests Tigers coach Michael Maguire. Plus, Six Tackles Trivia, #AskGus and the NRL Round 6 preview. Subscribe 👉 https://bit.ly/2lvAJT2 NRL News👉 https://bit.ly/2mPWIV9

02:00 League Players on TV Game Shows
03:30 Montoya Suspension
11:30 Anthony Milford
30:00 #AskGus
31:00 8 weeks to Origin
37:00 Six Tackles Trivia
43:00 Tigers and Madge
53:00 Round 6 preview

NRL on Nine is the home of rugby league in 2022 so stayed tuned for more NRL highlights, analysis, opinion and video.

Watch NRL LIVE and FREE: https://www.9now.com.au/nrl-premiership?ocid=Social-NRLFS

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NRLonNine/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/nrlonnine
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nrlonnine?lang=en
Twitter: https://twitter.com/NRLonNine

#NRLonNine #WideWorldofSports #NRL

source

49 thoughts on “Gus dishes some Milford truths: Six Tackles with Gus – Episode 8 | NRL on Nine”

  1. Who else heard that live? I sure did. "Get up Kyle ya F*****". Heard it as clear as day word for word. What a disgrace, everybody loses when somebody who represents our beloved game behaves like that. Exercise some self control or keep your mouth shut!

    I disagree with Gus, they should use Montoya as an example and I doubt very much this is a surprise to the players. The only shocking part is probably that Marcelo didn't realize his big mouth was being recorded on LIVE TV!

    Reply
  2. To try and sell us that Milford is living in a straw hut barely able to care for is family, is both insulting and ridiculous. You and your fellow commentators only talk about players like cattle at a stockyard, if he is broke there is a bigger problem than a contract.

    Taking a plea to lesser charges isn’t charges being thrown out, it is normally an admission of guilt and a reward for not wasting the courts time and resources, the moral and ethical arguments for and against this will continue until the end of time.

    The only thing I agree with is that he should be playing. It is very confusing given the NRL’s current and historical protection of wag beaters, drug and alcohol addicts and worse, that these minor charges would keep Milford out probably means he doesn’t have a high enough profile ie: make enough money for them.

    Reply
  3. A few comments
    Im wondering where has Milfords millions gone?
    Given that, he should be allowed to play if there is no criminal case. NRL are overreaching just like many WOKE corparists organizations. You are innocent until proven guilty. HE was cleared of the three assault charges and no convictions.
    Maybe Souths have a salary cap issue..

    One day soon there will be a court case against the NRL and the integrity unit by a player due to the their role as judicator.

    Reply
  4. People r going to be offended about anything. Whatever happened to having thick skin or more to the point how about free speech. Shouldn't even have been a fine.should be self policed within the team if other players r offended .

    Reply
  5. It shows the generational nature of outcry when it comes to the Montoya situation. The older the people I have talked to and Gus in this instance, do think it is an overreaction and should start with a warning and say that it wasn’t used in the context as a slur and is a term of phrase albeit a bad one.
    I can understand their opinion of it as we really have come along way. Myself included, when I was younger I did use the word and the phrase thats gay. I never not once understood the impact or hurt I could cause with these throw away lines. I learnt in my early 20’s the hurt and stopped using those phrases.

    My point being that NRL players range from 18-33 years of age with mostly in the 20’s. They have grown up in a different environment and there is really no excuse as these slurs should not be used as there is enough information at our fingertips. I think the 4 weeks is a fair stance surrounding the circumstances and the day and age we live in and the standards it sets for young men and women watching our game.

    Reply
  6. If there's one thing Souths don't need, it's another player attached to their franchise with domestic violence charges. Whether they're legitimate or not, Souths don't want to be involved in that conversation.

    Reply
  7. Milf been playing for how many years?
    Where's all his money after earning a lot more that most 80% of society?
    Most of us earn under 100k a year and most own homes lol

    Reply
  8. The women who assaulted Milford are they being charged? Just because they have a vagina does not give them the right to break the law and go around assaulting people. And they should also be charged for lying on a police report as well, its bad enough that you go and assault someone but you then accuse that person of assault lie to the police and drag them through the courts, so basically you get to assault them twice?

    Reply
  9. A. Totally sus from Souths. I don’t always agree with the opinions of Gussets Goulssh I do appreciate his knowledge and understanding of the great game. I certainly don’t agree with many actions, an inactions of the nrl. Bringing these issues to the Rugby League public is brave and the issue may be yet be resolved due ti this discussion. B. Attacking players backing into the tackler = crusher – No one wants to know about it – it’s in the way too hard basket and omg don’t ever give the defence any leeway whatsoever.😐 BLiGhT on the game? Got that right.
    C. Origin – never write QLD off. EVER 💙

    Reply
  10. Montoya is a victim of the “woke” ideology ravaging the planet at present. Political correctness gone mad has us policing and punishing ourselves harshly. The fact that the “victim” of the slur was not even gay seems to be missed by all, and our indignation at a player simply using a “naughty” word seems excessive. Soon our thoughts will be punished, at which stage we can just drop our ball and go home!

    Reply
  11. Haas defended himself as anyone would in a similar situation. Considering his strength and size, the incident ended with less damage done than might have been the case if anyone else was in his position. He should be commended for his restraint! The “woke” NRL and Judiciary should reign in their enthusiasm before these witch-hunts have the effect of souring the public’s love of the game.

    Reply
  12. This data base of offending players is equivalent to doxxing and is obsessive to the max. How about we brand all offenders with a hot iron, to mark them for ALL to see and to ostracise them from descent society. Perhaps the stocks and whipping should make a timely return to placate our woke obsession. All in all this is a sport that’s replaced our thirst for gladiatorial battles to the death. Should we really be surprised the warriors we create take their aggression beyond the field. How about THAT duty of care!!!

    Reply
  13. People like Gus are the problem with Milford,making excuses and blaming everyone else for his problems.Milford is responsible for everything that has happened to him and as soon as he realizes that the better he will go.

    Reply

Leave a Comment