George Carlin on Saving the Planet (REACTION)



ROAD TO 60,000 SUBS
CURRENT SUBS- 58,079

tiktok & instagram
michaelwduffy

what should I react to next !?!?

#georgecarlin #georgecarlinreaction #savingtheplanet #firsttime #firsttimereaction #firsttimehearing #comedy #standupcomedy #standupcomedyreaction #standupcomedian

NO COPYRIGHT INTENDED FAIR USE PURPOSES ONLY

source

38 thoughts on “George Carlin on Saving the Planet (REACTION)”

  1. Oh man! This was great! I rarely see anyone reacting to it, but one of his best bits is called "Balance the budget". You've gotta check it out. Wonderful stuff. Thanks, my friend….

    Reply
  2. I think he laughs about scientific reasoning, and he invents himself false scientific arguments like earth can adapt itself to plastic. Plastic is an artificial product, and doesn't disappear easily. Look at the 7th continent. Animals respect nature, we have to respect it to, nature can be fragile

    Reply
  3. Well you're right, he's known as the comic philosopher, saying things that make you go hmmmm. But if you want to see him in an earlier time(1965)doing conventional comedy- funny as well on the Merv Griffin Show(talk/entertainment show.)The clip is in YouTube

    Reply
  4. My background is engineering, and we always laugh at “going green”. The reality of going green when you’re in the loop is the cash All these government programs and research grants. “ OK we got a $5 million grant this year to study how rainfall affects the sidewalk”. So much of it is not what people think it is. Sad but true.

    Reply
  5. I remember in the 80's the supermarkets use to ask if you wanted paper or plastic bags. Then they stopped with the paper because we had to "save the trees" and we only had plastic. Now it is switched to no bag at all bring your own or you can pay .15 cents for a plastic bag! All bs.

    Reply
  6. It was in the 1980s when HIV/AIDS was virtually unstoppable at the time. Climate change is disputable all scientists do NOT agree. There are a few prevailing opinions (actors don't know what they're talking about). While garbage reduction and clean energy are a good idea, they don't really apply to climate change. Two of the prevailing theories are: another shift in the magnetic poles. This disrupts the magnetic shielding that protects us from the sun and massively warms the planet. It also increases cancer for sunbathers over time. Another theory is that tectonic shifting is leading to higher volcanic activity. If there's an increase in volcanic activity, that's bad (recall that planes couldn't fly for weeks when one erupted, and when Mt. St. Helens erupted, it blew of the entire side of the mountain). However, that's not the worst part – Yellowstone National Park is a super volcano. If it blows all at once, all FOUR states in the vicinity will be destroyed. Read the academic papers and realize the seriousness of the additional fallout of the aftermath. Yellowstone is releasing heat all the time – and that's a good thing. If it were to build up pressure and blow that would be very bad. Tectonics could cause the main faults in California up through Oregon to join and drop a sizeable amount of coastline into the ocean – or to at least shake it viciously. It's worth remembering that whatever does happen, the planet will likely survive and self correct – like Carlin mentions, the planet has been through a lot and has ended up here. We shouldn't be looking to control the planet. We should be looking to survive the changes that occur every millennia or so.

    Reply
  7. Die or evolve. I live in Alaska, we have two new species of bear now. We have groler bear and pizzlies. That's when a grizzly bear mate with polar bears. If the mother is a polar bear then I believe their groler bears and if the mom's a polar bear I believe their pizzlies. I may have those switched. But there have been 2nd and I believe 3rd generation animals shot up here. Meaning the groler bears and pizzlies are also breeding. Evolution is amazing.

    Reply

Leave a Comment