GAME OVER! NASA Declared Boeing Starliner Useless – Can't BEAT SpaceX!



GAME OVER! NASA Declared Boeing Starliner Useless – Can’t BEAT SpaceX!
SpaceX has made legacy manufacturer Boeing eating dust as NASA’s boss finally declares that the Starliner has no chance of beating SpaceX.
Once the underdog of the aerospace industry and on the brink of bankruptcy, SpaceX has grown leaps and bounds, gaining praise from even its sternest critics.

But how did SpaceX edge out Boeing and what sort of partnership does the company have with NASA? Let’s find out.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

🔔 Did you enjoy the content? Subscribe here:
https://rebrand.ly/wv3f1o2

🎥 Want to watch more? Find videos here:
https://rebrand.ly/348570

👽 Do you like the channel? Support us & get cool perks here:
https://rebrand.ly/1v7t7mp

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

⚠️ Copyright Disclaimers
• Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”
• We use images and content in accordance with the YouTube Fair Use copyright guidelines.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

#elonmusklive #nasa #spacex

raptors crew5 spacex crew 5 elon musk news boeing oft-2

source

48 thoughts on “GAME OVER! NASA Declared Boeing Starliner Useless – Can't BEAT SpaceX!”

  1. I had a roommate who worked for Boeing, and he said it was a country club. They bring in pizza's, donuts, and encourage their workers who have been sitting behind a desk for an hour, to get up and walk around. Inefficiencies abound, which is obvious by their results in comparison to Space X headed off by Elon Musk who believes in a 100 plus hour work week.

    Reply
  2. No Boeing will never catch up with SpaceX. Boeing is saddled with too much bureaucracy and overhead thus costing billions where SpaceX does it in millions. Also perhaps the good engineers have keft Boeing

    Reply
  3. Elon perfectly shows how God chooses who shines for Father. We love the "Thank Fucking God". We love honest praise and seeing you and your team succeed. We watch Elon so My Companion can see why The Heavens Smile at how well you do.

    Reply
  4. Some folks think building out Mars infrastructure for humans should wait until robotic missions lay the groundwork and thoroughly prove it's safe. Even then. breakthroughs in quantum physics, gravity and terraforming will likely not happen. Insufficient gravity, lack of magnetosphere and resources to make a food producing environment are not solvable without major discoveries in physics. Taking humans to Mars could be foolish. In the meantime we are wasting energy resources for a "pie in the sky" effort.

    Reply
  5. One content, two languages. What I have now written may have a perfect mirror in another language. You can create a program that searches for the perfect language mirror. Thanks to this, you will be able to speak two languages ​​and perform tasks in the shade.Endless enigmatic book in all languages. You can write a book with mirrors in all languages of the world. You can speak two languages at once, you just need to find the perfect reflection, same content, different translation. Infinite Mirrors. Pi 3.14 XBooks. Hybrid language. The algorithm flows through our heads, endless coding, just take off the chameleon masks. Connect words without spaces and you will find hidden tasks in all languages. Our conversations collide in the process, some words as well as numbers in words. We perform tasks hidden between words. You can create a Python coding language from a spoken language. You just need to find the mirrors. Two tongues glued together. Hack the brain.

    Reply
  6. Jest możliwość stworzenia programu, który porównuję języki i szuka podobieńst lustrzanych. Dzięki takiemu programowi byłbyś w stanie napisać nieskończoną piosenkę, na pewno gdzieś tam jest drugi sens. Można skleić dwie istniejące piosenki dwóch artystów poprzez taki program. Tam jest ukryty gad. Wystraczy połączyć wszystkie słowa bez spacji i przetłumaczyć w dwie strony na te języki, które istnieją. Tak samo można zamienić język pisany na cyfry i mówić w tym samym czasie językiem do porozumiewania, a w tle robić działania. Można też zamienić słowa na nuty, znaczy się literki.

    Reply
  7. Nasa has stagnated, you have to throw 5 billion dollars at them just to get them to get out of bed in the morning….it's no wonder all their projects recently have resulted in money down the drain…I heard that the average worker at Nasa is around 60 lol that's retirement age…..these guy's are ancient. No surprise it would require the commercialization of space to drive humanity forward…Nasa was never going anywhere without someone else carrying all the weight.

    Reply
  8. I foresee several Starship variants to accomplish the various missions as one design is very inefficient. What is needed for Earth based missions is unsuited to Lunar or Martian missions as well as the requirements for Lunar and Martian missions having different requirements. Earth gravity and atmosphere require different capabilities than the other missions. The 1/6th gravity of the moon and virtually zero atmosphere doesn't require atmospheric engines or heat shielding for example. Mars has about 1/3rd Earth gravity and roughly 1/100th the atmospheric density making larger airfoils desirable but likely less heat shielding or atmosphericengines. Orbital craft such as tankers and shuttles between Earth, Lunar and Martian space stations will require neither airfoils, heat shielding or atmospheric engines. That's at least 5 variants to optimize the performance and efficiency of each craft. A 6th or even 7th variants to shuttle fuel to and from Earth and Marsand their respective orbital tankers would be another optimization for the particular mission. I'm sure the SpaceX team is considering all of this and are designing parallel craft to be constructed as missions arise. All IMO

    Reply
  9. Space X is the winner. Just look at the comparable price tags from Boeing and Space X. Obviously the difference is in the leadership of each organization. I'm a solid Musk fan for good reason.

    Reply

Leave a Comment