Discover the groundbreaking Pulsed Plasma Rocket (PPR) developed by Howe Industries and funded by NASA. This innovative propulsion system could cut the travel time to Mars down to just two months, making space missions faster and safer. Learn how this technology works and its potential to revolutionize space exploration.
Chapters:
00:00 Introduction
00:36 Overview and Innovations of the Pulsed Plasma Rocket (PPR)
02:46 Achievements, Progress, and Technical Details
04:21 Impact on Future Mars Missions and Broader Implications
07:06 Outro
07:21 Enjoy
Best Telescopes for beginners:
Celestron 70mm Travel Scope
https://amzn.to/3jBi3yY
Celestron 114LCM Computerized Newtonian Telescope
https://amzn.to/3VzNUgU
Celestron – StarSense Explorer LT 80AZ
https://amzn.to/3jBRmds
Visit our website for up-to-the-minute updates:
www.nasaspacenews.com
Follow us
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/nasaspacenews
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpacenewsNasa
Join this channel to get access to these perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEuhsgmcQRbtfiz8KMfYwIQ/join
#NSN #NASA #Astronomy#MarsMission #NASA #PulsedPlasmaRocket #SpaceTravel #HoweIndustries #SpaceExploration #MarsInTwoMonths #NewRocketTech #FasterSpaceTravel #NuclearPropulsion #InnovativeTechnology #Astronauts #SpaceSafety #FutureOfSpace #MarsBase #InterplanetaryTravel #ScienceNews #SpaceInnovation #RocketScience #MarsJourney #SpaceMission #AdvancedPropulsion #NASAResearch #SpaceTech #MarsExploration #ExploringMars #SpaceFrontier #HumanOnMars #RocketDevelopment #SpaceUpdates
source
First
Incredibly 😊🥰🤣
Anyone that goes to Mars is insane,,it’s freezing ,no atmosphere,Radiation poisoning,there is nothing worth going for ,your going to die ,is your life worth it,all we need to do is fix this planet get rid of corruption,lies,hunger and poverty and plastics and have free energy stop wars and killing our selves
I prefer 48 hours or 2 months to Alpha Centarui.
I got an idea. Let people who own drones (don't have one) let their drones go there. Maybe virtual reality headset so they can see the planet from their full eye spectrum.
Does the two months include turning around at one month and accelerating in the opposite direction in order to come to a stop at Mars?
I wonder if we can actually make this in the next hundred years and finally get humans to other planets.
Wait for Boston Dynamic bottnauts to do the exploration on the ground of Mars.
This is great! No more Elon Musk blowing things up!!
The people who don't want to be held responsible for all the world's woes they caused, will be the first to leave. Let them have their own prison planet, and leave us regular Joes alone. It'll be rough, but at least they will be gone.
PLEASE do not send anymore chimps, dogs or other animals to space to die alone.
The solution is rotating magnetic fields (RMF) not this 'thing' that you are describing. RMF can propel a craft close to the speed of gravitons (think speed of light magnitudes) because it is the gravity that carries you along like sails in the wind. First you need to understand magnets and gravity. Give me a fraction of your billions and we can build it tomorrow.
Keep dreaming delusional Minds.
So much content on taking off and getting there.
When are we planning on perfecting landing?
It may look good on “paper” or in a CAD program. But it is a very long way off before even a prototype can be made or tested. A lot of considerations: First the space ship would have to be built in orbit or on the moon, otherwise a large powerful fuel rocket will be necessary to achieve escape velocity from the earth; secondly, what propulsion will be used to actually land on Mars? A small shuttle like the Apollo missions to the moon? That will not allow for a very long stay on the surface. If the entire craft is to land, then the problem of a fuel based rocket to leave the surface and escape Mars may still be necessary. It’s great to dream, but it’s better to do.
This one sounds like a winner . I believe that Richard Feynman once said something to the effect that were it not for politics , fission reactor engines would be the most practical for space travel .
a light sail pushed by orbital or ground lasers. then slowing down is your only problem
Thank God I can listen to this at 2x speed. So much talking, so little real information.
I thought magnets only workwd well on iron .
I dont really think we need to worry about polluting space .
When a rocket can get us to Mars in 2 hours I will be impressed.
Solar sail can be used as a transport ship around the moon and The Earth using gravity assist at both ends on earth are you up and take your product off and on the moon they take off their supplies and put on the product sample
Ha Ha , presently a concept dream . Talk about reality .
Wast of time, if its not Anti gravity technology and the technology is here on earth they just not sharing it ..
Unlikely, you could use this type of propulsion to take off and land so you would still need to carry chemical fuel and rockets.
Where would the energy come from? Is the claim that there would be a net gain in energy from nuclear fusion?
Just one question why are we talking about something thing that may or may not happen in years to come and may not be successful which hasn't been developed yet? I mean why are we just now being told this ? I'm just asking.. I'm not being disrespectful it's just that yes we've been successful with the ion engine fine and dandy sure but we also have the fusion rocket a few years ago and recently been successful in the stage one development not stage 2 or stage 3 by now or within the next 4 years. By another us agency one that can Power cities and nuclear subs. Under the green energy deal… now this by nasa total completely different engine rocket here a whole new level..no offense but the ILS program hasn't been up to par cause of mishaps.. now this. I just feel concerned about the safety issues lighting one of these on earth.. i mean same chemical make of atoms and so on that earth was made of now fusion elements like a star… I'm concerned I hope for the best and the program but idk
Interesting. Wishing NASA well. Y' know, there might be a different solution, maybe. F=ma=(m*v^2)/r, as in Huygens' equation for uniform circular motion. As in a rock on an end of a string being twirled? Where the rock is the mass, 'm.' Mass moving in a circular motion. Water being pumped through a circular tube of 3" ID at a rate of 3 gallons per second, by a centrifugal pump like those found in fire engines that can pump 600 gallons per minute — if you think of this circular pipe having a radius of about 10' and if the circular tube is folded roughly along its diameter to about 20 degrees then the equation then can be expressed as F = 2*cos(10 degrees)*[(25^3)/10] = 1.5 short tons, about (if you assume a path of 25' or so, not a full circumference then, sounds like. And other than keeping the water in its liquid state and having enough power to run the cited pump at 25 pounds per second and the system doesn't spring a leak (maybe self-sealing like fighter plane gas tanks?), I think that it might work. Nothing fancy here, just High School level Physics or Geometry. Best of luck. So if you have a fresh sheet of paper with a circle drawn on it, you can draw little arrow counter clockwise with little squares next to the little arrows, all the way around (that 'right hand rule'). Fold the sheet along the circle's diameter to about 20 degrees and there you go. Then you can get some flexible plastic tubing, a yardstick (that has on it a marked 18" spot), some tape, cardboard to fold into a 20 degree wedge shape, some string to string everything up and 'there you go, again.' Happy tinkering. & y' can talk over any of this to anyone y' want. High School Physics, that sort of thing.
Many energy invention are under hood of NASA as for space traveling the process is so dynamic that our eyes and mind simultaneously waiting for and eager to know about latest technology, Space is not Earth it needs every kind of discoveries to sustain in Infinite vastness.
A lot of words, but not a lot of info or details
How much thrust does it provide? Will it get you off the ground, or do you still need a chemical rocket to get you into orbit?
Lets focus on taking out Russia's new space weapons. We can fool with Mars later.
Even we can travel to Mars as that fast only in 2 months, I still will stay here on our beautiful Home Planet Earth! SpaceX and NASA can go there alone without me. But i'm really impressed wow! 😮😊
So no details but a lot of communist buzzwords such as sustainability… Great video!
Do you think if Columbus knew that the knew world was a barren wasteland, he would've wanted to go there? The queen would've ponied up the cash and gave him 4 or 5 ships? Do you think he would've found crews? So why the hell are we using so many resources to go to a planent that cannot sustain life, has no water, oxygen or fuel. Sterile soil that cannot be used for crops?!?
This does present a slightly off-center thought. At the speeds you are hinting at, how can the ship maneuver quickly enough to avoid a fatal collision with any unknown object? Side thrusters would have to be quite fast at startup and produce massive amounts of thrust.
Presumably, there are some scientific folks watching your channel. Your lack of explaining HOW the PPR actually works was disappointing to those folks (like me).
As long as humans are destroying this planet and constantly at war we have no business going to mars
I hear it's full of carbon dioxide so I'm thinking trees an water will fix it unless less there is something else
This is great, but let’s see if they actually implement it before finding it snatched away from it.