F-104 With Genie & Falcon Nuclear Missiles vs WWII IJN Pearl Harbor Fleet (Naval Battle 109) | DCS



As per Viewer requests we have made the AIR-2 Genie 1.5Kt Nuclear Rocket and AIM-26 Falcon 250T Nuclear Missile in DCS and we are going to use them against a ground target. We can only think of one ground target large enough, and that is the 28 ships and 353 aircraft of the 1941 WWII Imperial Japanese Fleet which attacked Pearl Harbor. This is going to be a big one…
Nuclear Battles:
Genie & Falcon vs IJN Fleet: https://youtu.be/P7BQFTMwafc
Genie vs WWII Bomber Raid: https://youtu.be/uABAxVPoDck
Genie vs Soviet Bomber Raid: https://youtu.be/RSe99PPuL5s
PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/GrimReapers
Mods: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3kOAM2N1YJcbzwU5FCo0DRmCdF3owO1o
0:00 Overview
0:56 Scenario Details
4:26 Predictions
6:00 Attempt With Conventional Weapons
16:14 Attempt With Nuclear Weapons

USEFUL LINKS
GRIM REAPERS (YouTube): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZuXjkFY00p1ga3UyCBbR2w
GRIM REAPERS 2 (YouTube): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZzvHfFzIpMrvgAbgZDUX9A
GR PODCASTS: https://anchor.fm/grim-reapers
DCS TUTORIALS: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZuXjkFY00p1ga3UyCBbR2w/playlists?view=50&sort=dd&shelf_id=5
DCS BUYERS GUIDES: https://youtu.be/fDpL5eVCKlA

DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
MERCHANDISE: https://www.redbubble.com/people/grmerchandise/shop?asc=u
PATREON monthly donations: https://www.patreon.com/GrimReapers
PAYPAL one-off donations: https://www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDonation

SOCIAL MEDIA
WEBSITE: https://grimreapers.net/
STREAM(Cap): https://www.twitch.tv/grimreaperscap
FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/GrimReapersGroup/
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/GrimReapers_
DISCORD: https://discord.gg/cATmE3d

THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx

#DCSQuestioned #GRNavalBattle #DCSNavalBattle #PearlHarbor #AIR2 #Genie #AIM26 #Falcon #Nuke #NuclearBomb #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #dcs

source

47 thoughts on “F-104 With Genie & Falcon Nuclear Missiles vs WWII IJN Pearl Harbor Fleet (Naval Battle 109) | DCS”

  1. Cap, I have some suggestions for more nuclear missions.

    1. S-300P nuclear air defense, the P could could have a nuclear warhead on it .

    2. B-52 strike with AGM-129a ACM (stealth nuclear cruise missile)

    3. B-61 strike (numerous platforms capable of carrying missile.

    Reply
  2. I’d love to see a series comparing AGM62M5 (Walleye II), GBU-15, Harpoons, and LRASMs in a period appropriate anti-ship missions so that we can see differences in performance. Well, we’ve seen the Mavericks, Harpoons and LRASMs many times, so I’m mostly curious how much baby-sitting the TV guided gliders require vs the modern fire-and-forget missiles in a maritime strike. Presumably they would be used soon after SEAD strikes from Shrikes or HARMs.

    Reply
  3. Ngl it bothers me every time you feather the Vulcan. Pretty sure it’s more likely to jam if you fire it in bursts like that. Long bursts with time for it to spool down would be more realistic.

    Reply
  4. In Operation Crossroads, Test Able, in 1946, the aircraft carrier USS Saratoga stayed afloat after being subjected to a 20-kiloton airburst. Didn't look too pretty, mind, but she stayed afloat. She even stayed afloat for a couple of hours after Test Baker, an underwater explosion.

    Reply
  5. Me at the start of the video – "Based on the 29 minutes run time, I'm gonna say 'Yes'…".

    I'd still love you guys to build me a high altitude/low orbit space force to simulate hypersonic missile and aircraft fighting at huge altitudes and speeds!

    Reply
  6. I think a great idea would be to launch a raid similar to the last raid you posted into Crimea but the goal of this raid would be to land some hinds or other helicopters somewhere near the kerch bridge in an attempt to sabotage it, the question is with the f-16s and the more modern missiles being given to Ukraine can they have a chance of performing a good enough SEAD mission and suppress the s400s long enough to land a special forces team to at least do something

    Reply
  7. Just curious why you keep using the Yamamoto for these scenarios?. The Yamamoto did not come into service until 1942.
    I mean a 70000 ton battleship is not very realistic when most of their battleships at that point we're only about 30,000 Max. You better off using some of their other battleships or the Italian ones

    Reply
  8. 7 miles is way outside blast radius. 14 miles is merely a light show for carrier class ships. Get them a mile apart and then you can sink them by the dozen, but spread out , you will kill escorts and a piece of the flotilla, but not all of them.

    Reply
  9. Yes, there are several effects a nuclear warhead would have that don't get modelled in DCS. Not only would everyone be deafened, but anyone who happened to be looking in the wrong direction when the warhead detonated would be blinded, and a lot of a ship's electrical systems would be damaged by the EMP. You'd very likely take out most of the fleet in terms of combat effectiveness.

    Reply
  10. Hey Cap, did you once try a MOAB against the IJN fleet? It would be difficult I know, but dropping them from a C-130, and I'll say it again, maybe attack with the AC-130. Yeah, the Zero's would be a problem, but if you began/appeared not too far from the fleet (like a mid-air start), possibilities. Really like these what-if missions.

    Reply
  11. Assuming the shockwave, heat blast and radiation didn’t turn the entire crew into a puddle on the deck, there’s a good chance of bursting the aviation fuel tanks and igniting the contents which would almost certainly destroy the carriers. A close hit like Poosh’s rocket would cave the hull in like a tin can.

    Reply
  12. I'm pretty sure it would do more than that RL, the shockwave should propagate pretty well through the water and do some messy things to their hulls. I can understand why DCS wouldn't simulate that though.

    Reply

Leave a Comment