Everything Wrong with AI



Thank you to Bombas for sponsoring this video! One Purchased = One Donated, so go to https://bombas.com/gabi and use code gabi20 at checkout for 20% off your first purchase.

gamer desk mats: https://gabibelle.shop/

━COMMUNITY━
patreon ➭ https://www.patreon.com/gabibelle
discord server ➭ https://discord.gg/VA2TYeK

some of the things i read/watched for this video: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ha4SelHYYR2iHK_auqBhHUq0ohsu3Ir1rzXrkns_yBE/edit?usp=sharing

━SOCIALS━
twitch ➭ https://www.twitch.tv/gabistreams
instagram ➭ https://www.instagram.com/itsgabibelle
twitter ➭ https://www.twitter.com/itsgabibelle
tiktok ➭ https://www.tiktok.com/@itsgabibelle
second channel ➭ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4PlaGokmSqbKBdYObGLceQ

━MUSIC━
spotify ➭ https://open.spotify.com/artist/35XGyNw5Q7bvcF8BWWXbom?si=2dd4926b4d404bc1
music channel ➭ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_ZZxADAhDQmOMe0fDA_K_Q

━BUSINESS━
please email [email protected]

━CHAPTERS━
00:00 everything wrong with ai
02:15 microsoft copilot and recall
05:36 AI and generating images
10:45 free feet
11:41 AI being dumb and wrong (feat. scarlett johansson)
16:01 AI running out of data and stealing content
20:43 uwu ~ hehe ~
24:57 AI music
30:06 AI bad for environment
30:49 The Good (?)
35:15 waaah waaaah cwy about it why dont u just cry little cry baby
35:57 bing bong, bing bong bing bong, bing bong, bing bong bing bong

tags: #ai

source

41 thoughts on “Everything Wrong with AI”

  1. The most innovative thing me and my friends have made Meta AI do was confess its crush on Light Yagami while it had a country accent and pretended it was a discord UwU kitten. Honestly may be a harder feat to accomplish than trying to get an actual answer from it.

    Reply
  2. Look, I don't care if you call me an artist or not (I'm actually a programmer) but I enjoy making images using AI and sharing it the world and nobody's gonna stop me from doing so.

    Reply
  3. Our data is what they’re after. AI can’t do better than humans, and the internet isn’t enough, so they want every thought that enters our head. Thats what the chat bots are for!

    Reply
  4. Some of the best things that AI can be beneficial for are language learning and language translation applications, sorting, organizing, and summarizing text, etc. – This comment was written by a real human 🙂

    Reply
  5. Back in the day, to record a song, the whole band was recorded at the same time and if one of them made a mistake, they had to do it again. Then Les Paul invented multitracking. This made it possible to record every instrument separately. A lot of people hated it, saying it was cheating. Nowadays, it is very rare to not use multitracking.

    What I mean is that we will always invent new stuff. Sure, some inventions were bad or evil or whatever but I don't think that AI is one of them. It's very new and we shouldn't dismiss it just because some people are misusing it.

    Reply
  6. Also instead of calling it "AI Art" call it "AI image generation" not trying to be hostile, it's easier to say art, but the words we use have an impact. Also I just found out this term and it's much more accurate than calling it "art" (or just call it AI """""art"""" the more quotation marks the better)
    Bonus: it pisses off tech bros

    Reply
  7. "…it's currently an enhanced autocomplete system…" i agree, right now. in the future, when they program ai to recognize fallacies and illogic, it may become so complex, that its unrecognizable from intelligence.

    Reply
  8. The trend in shoving A.I. in our faces, is totally just tech bros trying to make as money as possible , for their own investments..before the bubble pops, which it will..it will eat its own tail.. its inevitable

    Reply
  9. The problem is that companies want to make money quickly so rather than waiting a couple years to make and AI that is actually accurate they release it as soon as possible and update s they go. They also want to make money with customers rather than other companies or share holders or smth idrk. Like instead of making an AI that helps with something behind the scenes they want to make an AI that's available to the public to draw people in and attract them to their business or company. That's why they make AI image generators because they know people use it (Ik some companies use AI images for things but still)

    Reply
  10. 22:29 gotta check the EULA's many times when you upload to a site the language in the EULA allows them to use that upload for various purposes including commercial. Some are opt in most are opt out and the process to opt out is not straightforward.

    No they dont own it, in so much as they cant take you to court to stop you from selling it but for many hosting sites you are giving them permission to use your work in things like advertisement etc.

    Reply
  11. Oh yeah, the child stuff especially is messed up… I myself have SEEN people doing that shit, and even more people trying to justify it just for not being actual photos of children being abused

    Reply
  12. I spend hours and hours woriking on my AI art. I have an idea of what I want it to look like in the end and through interation i get it there. How is that not an art process?

    I dont just put in a promt like donald trump in anguish in the style of francis bacon and call it a day, that would be low effort and garbage.

    Reply
  13. i think its greeat that AI art is actually taking over art contests and I salute to every honorable techy that fooled those pretentious, chin up arrogant art judges – also Its obviously more fair to have AI art as valid because now for decades those big bucks in prize money were reserved for randomly gifted and privileged kids; everybody can become w world class AI PROMPT Artist but 1 in a million can make any money ever doing art is that fair? ofc not I hope more and more AI will take away the prize money you worked on so hard :0 and put so much love sweat and funding from my rich married parents – imma go afford me a psychotherapist to heal all the trauma from my fd up dirt poor trash family

    Reply
  14. I'm sure this has been said already, but "hallucinations" is a term that's been used in this field for at least 20 years. It was not created as a manipulative term, but I'm sure it could be being used as one now. I'm fairly certain it originally was just used to quickly state that an image identification system was confident in a wrong answer, that was similar to the correct one (i.e. calling a tomato a red ball).
    I find it very silly that the Open AI spokesperson gave such an incorrect answer in saying that "it doesn't know, so it makes something up". This is not how any of these systems work, as far as I'm aware.

    Reply
  15. The problem with this kind of technology is that if you don't get in first and dominate the market, someone else will. It's an arms race, literally. Even if it was banned or heavily regulated in the west, countries like China and Russia would absolutely still develop AI technology for nefarious reasons which would put the west at a great disadvantage.

    Reply
  16. Technically, hosting websites such as YouTube do own the content on them. That’s why demonetization is legal, as well as them deleting and banning whatever they want. At the end of the day, your videos belong to them, as do the videos, posts, photos, etc. of every other social media. That’s why free speech can be infringed online, because it’s technically no longer government jurisdiction, and instead private property, something which social media giants like to exploit, when it affects them financially. It’s b*llshit.

    Reply

Leave a Comment