Dog Owners vs Gangs: Which Is More Dangerous As Neighbors?



#xlbully #dog #pitbull #rottweiler

source

27 thoughts on “Dog Owners vs Gangs: Which Is More Dangerous As Neighbors?”

  1. So the Fair Housing Act does protect ESA unfortunately, but just like the laws that allow service animals (not ESAs) into restaurants and grocery stores there are exceptions. If the dog is too big to be a reasonable accommodation ( something I see in apartments all the time), if the animal is unruly and constantly causes a disturbance (barking), or if the rental property is small (I think less than 4 units) the landlord does NOT have to rent to these mutants and their inconsiderate owners.

    Reply
  2. Luv the content and I hate mutts and bullies the same as you but I would have disagree with some parts of this but even gang members have nutters and allow these things of leashes gang promote the mutts such as snoop dogg or whoever dawg because they want to identify with the violent instinct or respect that comes with it

    Reply
  3. I was in a gang myself, but a small one not those big crips or bloods type thing, I can guarantee you that gang members are not just safer but better as human beings than mutt owners, that stereotype that you join a gang to “look cool” is for wannabes the real gangsters have actually been through the toughest things like losing your brothers/family/friends to street violence or just misfortunate enough to go down the route of robbing/selling drugs. Dog owners on the other hand are opposite of real gangstas, they are wannabes especially the large dog owners who had everything they needed growing up except for the fact that they were masculine which makes them hate every other man on this planet leading them to own a brainless mutant who can intimidate people and even injure those same people these dog owners hate and envy

    Reply
  4. From my experience, gang members understand really well that vulnerable people like elderlies and children need to be protected, I still remember when I was like 12 some older bullies in their late teens to early 20s were picking on me and here came a 6’4 darkskin gang member/dope slinger who came to my rescue and beat up the older bullies, another time was when a 7 year old kid was lost in the mall and one gangster treated that kid like his son and took full responsibility of finding his family…Dogs on the other hand attack and torture kids and their enabling owners are so heartless they start defending their dog since they don’t want their worthless mutt dead or they just avoid going to jail

    Reply
  5. As a former gang member, I will honestly say dogs are way more dangerous because gang members only attack the opposing gang members & those threatening our hood. Dogs on the other hand attack anything that move

    Reply
  6. Gang members can change their lifestyles and personalities to help other's and be positive role models especially to the kids. You will never ever see that with dogs as they will still remain the real violent killers to humanity.

    Reply
  7. Not to delve too deep into my past, but when I was a teenager, I befriended a gang member. While gangs are dangerous, dogs have them beat. They are less likely to just attack an elderly or child for no good reason. Dogs will do it just because they suck.

    Reply
  8. This is a false choice. Gang members are waste land scavengers like hyenas and jackals. Basically dogs. The average domesticated dog is way more reliable and cuter and won’t shoot you in the head over absolutely nothing

    Reply
  9. I’ve been around and walk passed gang members most of them don’t really bother you unless you have some type of beef either them but other than most gang members are cool as long as you have respect and mind business now bullybreeds are another story

    Reply
  10. I'm not at all down with this defending of gangs. C'mon man. I watched my hometown be utterly destroyed by gangs and I moved far away to rural Colorado to get away from them. Do better.

    Reply
  11. I just did a Google search on dog bites per year versus violent crime per year…. Dog bites are 4.5 million while violent crimes reported in 2022 was 1,300,000 + roughly now let's just look at the unfortunate 800, 000 people that have to be hospitalized for dog bites every year it's almost the same
    So statistically dog bites are more frequent

    Reply
  12. after i heard some stats that dogs attack people while they have seizures omg that was the most horrific part for me! I have a seizure condition and having one is so scary and draining in the first place, but waking up to a dog attacking you when you're conscious again? omg how traumatic for those people i can't imagine, like you would wanna go back unconscious after seeing a mutt in your face

    Reply
  13. I'm going to be real here, I thought the video and comments were strange at first making gang members not seem as bad (that's the impression I got), but I think I understand. It sounds like your gangs have a bit more of a "code" of who can be targeted, but in Australia, apart from motorcycle gangs, what people consider to be "gangs" are groups of teenagers and people in their 20s physically assaulting strangers, mugging them (four guys mugged me 5 years ago), home invasions, etc. Everyone owning pitbulls and those beasts hurting and killing people is more comparable, but as much as I hate breeds that aren't bully breeds too, I would rather deal with some shitty poodles any day than be scared of being assaulted and traumatized again by a gang of psychopaths. Anyway, I don't care for gangs or "they only target each other" stuff I see in the comments. I want them as far away from me as possible, as I do bully breeds and any dog breed in general. There might be "good" gang members and people who turn their life around, but I refuse to be in their wake of destruction before they get to that point.

    Reply

Leave a Comment