Demons, but they are Harmless | Against the Odds | Explorer Magic: the Gathering (MTG)



What are the odds of winning by giving the opponent Archfiend of the Dross with Harmless Offering in a Demon Tribal deck that can also win with Liliana’s Contract? Let’s find out!

Today’s video is brought to you by Card Kingdom. You can pick up some MTG cards (and help support the show) at https://www.cardkingdom.com/mtggoldfish

â–º Read more about this deck (full article): https://www.mtggoldfish.com/articles/against-the-odds-harmless-demons-explorer
â–º View this deck with the latest prices: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/5465837#paper

â—¼ Purchase this deck (paper): http://mtg.fish/v0WkK
â—¼ Purchase this deck (Magic Online): http://mtg.fish/02QfY

#MTG
#MagicTheGathering
#MTGArena
#mtgexplorer

0:00 Start
3:32 Games

source

38 thoughts on “Demons, but they are Harmless | Against the Odds | Explorer Magic: the Gathering (MTG)”

  1. I swear that Seth and I must be on the same wave length…I was play testing around with Gleeful Smash, then the Gleeful Whacking video comes out… LITERALLY YESTERDAY I was building around harmless offering and Archfiend of the Dross and then this!!!

    Reply
  2. What about the 4 cc black offering that’s in ONE that’s offering 5-8 and I would concentrate more on removal and setup the offering plan with either pact and/ or demon. At least that’s how I have my version setup

    Reply
  3. I agree Varragoth, Bloodsky Sire is so much better than at first glance. Seems hard to get the card search trigger but the OP doesn't want to block and lose their good creature and chumping doesn't stop it. I have it as my Commander for a demon tribal deck and as a 4 of in my Lilliana's contract demon deck and it is sooo good. Especially as a Commander can tutor everything including demonic tutor lol and Runescape Demon

    Reply
  4. Or, hear me out, you could play Archfiend of the Dross and then enchant metamorphic alteration onto an opponent’s creature to turn it into Archfiend without oil counters.

    Reply
  5. against that aura deck in game two, I think the line w/ fatal on sram should have been to thoughtseize and take all that glitters, then when he tries to load up sram on his turn, fatal push. Could have gotten rid of two auras and the creature that way.

    Reply

Leave a Comment