COVID Inquiry l Module Two | Thursday, October 19



Module two of the Covid-19 Inquiry continues today evaluating core UK decision making and political governance, with statements from the core participants.

The session will hear from:

– Professor Catherine Noakes, Professor of Environmental Engineering for Buildings
– Professor John Edmunds, Professor of Epidemiology and Population Health

Read more 👉 https://news.sky.com/topic/covid-inquiry-10725

#skynews #covid19 #covidinquiry

SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more videos: http://www.youtube.com/skynews
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/skynews
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/skynews
Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/skynews
Follow us on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@skynews

For more content go to http://news.sky.com and download our apps: Apple https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/sky-news/id316391924?mt=8 Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bskyb.skynews.android&hl=en_GB

Sky News Daily podcast is available for free here: https://podfollow.com/skynewsdaily/

Sky News videos are now available in Spanish here/Los video de Sky News están disponibles en español aquí: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzG5BnqHO8oNlrPDW9CYJog

To enquire about licensing Sky News content, you can find more information here: https://news.sky.com/info/library-sales

source

11 thoughts on “COVID Inquiry l Module Two | Thursday, October 19”

  1. The whole chosen list of questions was themed to discredit Henigan. Starting with misrepresentation of his history and especially the school playground ending on the F wit WhatsApp 'evidence'. I expect more and better from the inquiry, not a lawyer hit job on individuals.

    Reply
  2. Ah yes, Covid. The usual Winter cough and cold for 95% of the population. Why is this still news? There are much bigger problems that need to be dealt with in 2023 before they spiral out of control!

    Reply
  3. Just watched. As Carl rightly points out the term was used because they did not appreciate the differing views,which turned out to be correct.. instead their models were actually nonesense created by f-ek_wits. They also thought the swedish approach was poor. They were very wrong

    Reply

Leave a Comment