Constitutional Questions



Get your โ€œWe Donโ€™t Stopโ€ T-shirt and your Indestructible Tri-Fold on DeletelawZ dot com โ€” We Dont Stop โ€”

THE TRANSPARENCY APP IS COMING VERY SOON!!

You should always use THE TRIFOLD That we sell on INDESTRUCTIBLE PAPER from the website DeleteLawZ dot com for $25.00. We ship it from Los Angeles. OR โ€” get the Trifold you PRINT AT HOME for five dollars by Putting โ€œFiveDollarTrifoldโ€ (When you go to Purchase the $15 Digital Download, thatโ€™s WHEN you put the ONE WORD, FiveDollarTrifold in and then you print it at home)

DeleteLawZ dot com

Thanks,
Chille
@ChilleDeCastro PayPal
@Chille-DeCastro Venmo
$ChilleDeCastro Cashapp

source

28 thoughts on “Constitutional Questions”

  1. The founding fathers also passed the Naturalization Act of 1790. Only people that were free, white, and of good moral character could apply for citizenship. Also, you had to own property to vote. People today donโ€™t want to talk about this Act, but the founding fathers were very clear who should be citizens in the USA.

    Reply
  2. Thank God for George Mason! He was the one who told Madison that the Bill of Rights needed to be added to the Constitution. Mason was from Virginia and was part of the Anti Federalist group. After reviewing the Constitution, Mason stated that he would rather cut off his right hand than sign that wicked document. He was a true Patriot.

    Reply
  3. You should read what they did to Rhode Island. RI didnโ€™t send any reps to Philadelphia. RI didnโ€™t want anything to do with a federal government. Washington threatened RI with invasion if they didnโ€™t sign the Constitution. So RI signed under duress, which is non binding.

    Reply
  4. ๐๐š๐ซ๐ญ ๐Ÿ – ๐Ž๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ข๐œ๐ž๐ซ ๐ƒ๐ž๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐’๐š๐ซ๐ ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ฏ. ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ก ๐‚๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ฅ ๐‘๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ๐ฌ ๐‹๐š๐ฐ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ

    POSTED BY ๐Ÿ”บ The Civil Rights Lawyer

    POSTED ON๐Ÿ”บ Sep 4, 2022

    LINK๐Ÿ”บ

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgBh11Rk7TU

    COMMENTS ๐Ÿ”บ ๐Ÿ”บJohn H. Bryan ESQ / Civil Rights Attorney, Constitutional Activist

    Finally: Part 2 of the police officer deposition in the Sargent v. Bish Section 1983 case.

    Melvinโ€™s wife filmed his arrest. A federal civil rights lawsuit was filed. Hereโ€™s part 2 of the video deposition of the primary defendant police officer.

    Reply
  5. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ

    POSTED BY ๐Ÿ”บ ๐ƒ๐ž๐ฅ๐ž๐ญ๐ž ๐‹๐š๐ฐ๐ณ

    45.8K subscribers

    POSTED ON๐Ÿ”บ Jun 14, 2021 … 27,136 views

    LINK๐Ÿ”บ

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PjrqkSaexA

    COMMENTS ๐Ÿ”บ ๐Ÿ”บ๐ƒ๐ž๐ฅ๐ž๐ญ๐ž ๐‹๐š๐ฐ๐ณ ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐€๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ

    The most destructive "Law" in America is Terry v. Ohio.

    #OverturnTerry #OverturnTerryVsOhio

    Join us,

    http://www.DeleteLawZ.com

    http://www.LegallyDeparted.com

    โ˜พ ยฐโ˜† ใ€€ยธ. *โ˜†โ˜…ใ€€ยฐ โ˜พ ยฐโ˜† ใ€€ยธ. * โ˜พ ยฐโ˜† ใ€€ยธ. *โ˜†โ˜…ใ€€ยฐ โ˜พ

    ยฐโ˜† ใ€€ยธ. *๏ปฟ โ˜พ ยฐโ˜† ใ€€*โ˜†โ˜…ใ€€ยฐ ยฐโ˜† ใ€€ยธ. * โ— ยธ .

    ใ€€ใ€€ใ€€โ˜…ใ€€ยฐ๏ปฟ โ˜พ ยฐโ˜† ใ€€ยธ. * โ—๏ปฟ ยธ โ˜พ ยฐโ˜† ใ€€ยธ. * โ— ยธ .ใ€€ใ€€

    ใ€€โ˜…ใ€€ยฐ โ˜พ ยฐโ˜† ใ€€ยธ. * โ— ยธ .ใ€€ใ€€ใ€€โ˜…ใ€€ยฐ :.ใ€€โ•ฑ

    โ”‚โˆฉโ”‚_โ—ฅโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ—ฃ___โ•ฑโ—ฅโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ—ฃ

    โ•ฑโ—ฅโ—ฃ___โ—ฅโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ—ฃโ–“โˆฉโ–“โ”‚โˆฉโ•‘

    โ”‚โ•ฑโ—ฅโ–ˆโ—ฃ โ•‘โˆฉโˆฉโˆฉโ•‘___โ—ฅโ–ˆโ–“โ–“โ–ˆโ—ฃ

    โ”‚โ”‚โˆฉโ”‚โ–“__โ•‘โˆฉ็”ฐโ”‚โ•‘โ–“ โ–“ โ–“โˆฉ โ–“โ•‘

    โ™ฅโ™ชโ™ซ*ยจ*โ€ข.ยธยธโคยธยธ.โ€ข*ยจ*โ€ขโ™ซโ™ชโ™ฅยธโ™ฅโ™ชโ™ซ*ยจ*โ€ข .ยธยธโคยธ

    โ™ฅ_โ™ฅ__โ™ฅ_โ™ฅ Put this

    โ™ฅ___โ™ฅ_โ™ฅ___โ™ฅ heart

    โ™ฅ___โ™ฅ___โ™ฅ on your

    _โ™ฅ_____โ™ฅ_ page if

    __โ™ฅ___โ™ฅ__ you love

    ___โ™ฅ_โ™ฅ___ someone

    ____โ™ฅ____ very much

    โคโคโคโคโคโคโคโคโคโคโคโคโคโคโคโคโค

    Reply
  6. Delete laws you are a joke. You go on about the constitution but you are basically against free speech and freedom of press. You are suing 1st amendment auditors for recording in public saying they don't have the right to. You also said there is such thing as privacy in public. You are a hypocrit

    Reply
  7. Loitering and disorderly conduct are lawz that should be deleted in a free country. It gives police the power to decide who is a criminal. Also, yes our govt restricts education on laws, rights, taxes ect. because they want you smart enough to work and pay taxes and no more. Then further devide us, distracting us all of our true enemies, corruption and tyranny.

    Reply
  8. Itโ€™s funny the lady said โ€œtheyโ€™re trying to take our rightsโ€, but doesnโ€™t even know them. Sheโ€™s just parroting right wing talking points like so many others. I would bet anything she โ€œsupports the policeโ€. It would be nice if they would take a little bit of time to learn rather than just repeat Facebook memes.

    Reply
  9. Here is a ton of facts and case law with terms and meanings. We do not have to obey nor should we…. let the class begin…..

    "Shall not be infringed on".
    Gun laws are an "infringement"
    definition: the action of limiting or undermining something. "Limiting" who can have a firearm and where,when by directly "undermining" the 2nd amendment.

    1st part "a well regulated Militia" a Militia was described as "able bodied men willing and able to take up arms if they should need to in order to secure and maintain a free state".

    The 2nd amendment was put in place to prevent (government) over reach from (infringing) on our (rights).
    This means police,military or reserves do NOT classify as "militia" as some argue becuase they are a "government" entity.
    Time for case law.
    Miranda v arizona "where rights secured by the constitution are involved, there can be no ruling or legislation which would abrogate them".

    South carolina v united states " the constitution is a written instrument,as such its meaning does not alter. That which it ment when it was adopted,it means now".

    Marbury v madison "a citizen can refuse to follow a law that violates right that are constitutionally protected".

    Nysrpa v bruen 2022 " the right to keep and bear arms includes bearing arms for personal protection ourside of the home, current and future laws would be required to meet historical tradition"

    Mcdonald v city of chicago 2010 "the 2nd amendment is fundamental for self defense and applies to the states under the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment"

    District of Columbia v Heller "The right to keep and bear arms is infact an individual right, and no active militia participation is necessary to excercise that right."

    1939 miller v. united states "military and militia style weapons are protected under the 2nd amendment"

    Plummer v. State was an 1893 court case decided by the Indiana Supreme Court. The case overturned a manslaughter conviction, ruling that the convicted defendant had been protecting himself from the illegal use of force by a police officer.

    If you are pro 2nd amendment you are pro 2nd amendmentย  for everyone.
    if you are not then you are not pro 2nd amendment, you're pro 2nd amendment to those you approve of.
    All these gun laws violate the constitution period and people need to stand up to this.
    Absolutely every person in the United states has an equal right to keep and bear arms.
    It does not matter what some state law says or city law says it does not matter your background.
    your are a "person" and a "citizen."
    All state and city laws are bound by the constitution and if they are not they do not have to be followed as they are tyranical in nature.
    Every single gun law on the books is illegal. Nics background check is illegal,switch bans,magazine bans,bumpstock bans,assault weapons bans are all illegal.
    Every gun law back to 1934 legally has to go.

    2nd amendment
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the (right of the people) to keep and bear Arms, (shall not be infringed).

    9th amendment
    "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people".
    (Congress has no authority to pass bills that violate the constitution).

    10th amendment
    "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people".

    Article 6 paragraph 2 of the constitution (Supremcy clause of the constitution)
    "This constitution and laws of the United states which shall be made in pursuants their of and the treaties made are what shall be named inder the authority of the United states shall be the supreme law of the land, and the judges in every state shall be bound their by.
    anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary are not withstanding".

    Marbury v madison 1803 u.s. reports vol. 5 page 137
    This is one of the leading cases in the history of the united states of america, the opinion of the court was given by the honorable judge John Marshall cheif Justice on the supreme court. His opinion was anything that is in conflict is null in void of law clearly he said that "for a secondary law to come in conflict with the supreme law was illogical, for certainly the supreme law would prevail over all other laws and certainly our forfathers had intended that the supreme law would be the basis of all law, and for any law to come in conflict would be null in void of law, it would bear no power to enforce,it would bare no obligation to obey, it would purport the settle as if it never existed for unconstitutionality would date from any enactment of such a law. No courts are bound to uphold it and no citizens are bound to obey it. "

    It operates as a mere nullity or fiction of law, which means it DOESNT EXSIST in law.

    (Thompson v smith)
    "the right of a citizen to ravel on a public highway, and to transport his/her property theirun either by horse drawn carraige or by automobile is not mere privilege which a city can prohibit or permit at will, but a common right in which he/she has under right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness"

    (Miller vs us)
    "If the state converts a liberty into a privilege the citizen can engage in their right with impunity"

    Chicago coach co v city of Chicago "no
    state government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, waterways,transporting ones vehicle for personal property for either recreation or buisness, but by being only subject to local regulations i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limit, etc. Travel is not a privilege requiring licensing, vehicle registration or forced insurance."

    Wingfield v fielder 1972 "the court makes it clear that licensing relates to engage in profession, buisness, trade or calling; thus when merely traveling without compensation or profit, outside of buisness enterprise or adventure with the corporate state, no license is required of the natural individual for personal buisness, pleasure, and transportation."

    Berberian v lussier 1958 "the use of the automobile as a necessary adjunt to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of LIBERTY within the meaning of the constitutional guarantees."

    Reply
  10. "๐ˆ๐ญ'๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ญ ๐š ๐†๐ฎ๐ง ๐๐ซ๐จ" – ๐‹๐€๐๐ƒ ๐…๐จ๐จ๐ญ๐š๐ ๐ž ๐’๐ก๐จ๐ฐ๐ฌ ๐’๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ž๐œ๐ญ ๐‡๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐  ๐‚๐š๐ซ ๐๐š๐ซ๐ญ

    POSTED BY ๐Ÿ”บ The Civil Rights Lawyer

    POSTED ON๐Ÿ”บ Sep 6, 2022

    LINK๐Ÿ”บ

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXAtcfxULYs

    COMMENTS ๐Ÿ”บ ๐Ÿ”บJohn H. Bryan ESQ / Civil Rights Attorney, Constitutional Activist

    Weโ€™ve all seen the recent shooting footage out of Ohio. But that may have overshadowed another recent case where body cam footage was just released from the LAPD. Body cam footage reveals that just before officers shot an unarmed man holding an automotive part, that one of the officers said to the others, โ€œitโ€™s not a gun bro.โ€ Then he was shot with no warning. Indeed, it wasnโ€™t a gun.

    Reply
  11. ๐“๐ซ๐š๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ข๐œ ๐’๐ญ๐จ๐ฉ ๐“๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ญ๐จ ๐ƒ๐”๐ˆ ๐ƒ๐ข๐ฌ๐š๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ

    Link๐Ÿ”ป

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yeC4PSsrjk

    Captured in Ohio

    Aug 23, 2022

    ๐Œ๐€๐Š๐„ ๐๐„๐– ๐‹๐„๐†๐ˆ๐’๐‹๐€๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐ ๐“๐Ž ๐’๐“๐Ž๐ ๐๐‹๐”๐„ ๐‹๐ˆ๐๐„ ๐ˆ๐’๐ˆ๐’ ๐ƒ๐Ž๐Œ๐„๐’๐“๐ˆ๐‚ ๐“๐„๐‘๐‘๐Ž๐‘๐ˆ๐’๐Œ๐Ÿ”ป

    โ–ฌโ–ˆโ”€โ–ˆโ–โ–Œ โ–€โ–ˆโ–€ ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ”ป

    โ€‹COPS ARE BETA MALES WITH NO SKILLS๐Ÿคฏ

    โ€‹COPS THINK THEY HAVE DOMINION AND CONTROL OF OUR BODY FUNCTIONS ๐Ÿคฏ

    โ€‹YOU'RE NOT MY DADDY YOU'RE A BETA MALE MENTALLY ๐Ÿคฏ

    โš โ–ฌโ–ฌโ–ฌโ–ฌโ–ฌโ–ฌโ–ฌโ–ฌโ–ฌ ๐’๐ญ๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ข๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘ƒ๐Ÿ‘

    Reply
  12. Damn Chileโ€ฆ I know the answers and I might get jammed up if you ran down on me with your erratic questioning ๐Ÿ˜‚โ€ฆ love what you do brother ๐Ÿ’ฏ

    Reply

Leave a Comment