Calvine UFO Combined Data



Maybe we need to combine our research into the Calvine UFO, to work out what it really might be?

Thanks for watching – Leave a comment and get in touch if you have more info.
Simon Holland – Science Filmmaker.

Support this research by becoming a Patreon from only $1
https://www.patreon.com/profsimon

source

23 thoughts on “Calvine UFO Combined Data”

  1. The “ufo” object in the picture that has a jet in the background looks nothing like the “towed “ object. Although with recent information about the US developing anti gravity , it could have been a stray experimental craft I suppose.

    Reply
  2. as i have an obsession for distance and meridian anomalies, i noticed, Calvine shares very precisely the meridian of many cities going South all the way through North Africa and even reaches Abidjan. distance to AlcalaReal (Spain), is 1333mi, which as sual suggests very precise measuring abilities of the placement of these in such tight lines and frequently infinite values usually 3s. distance to Toledo which it also intersects is 1166mi. to the southern Spanish coast at Torrox its 2226km right at the water line. This -3.92 meridian is also Al Hoceima across the Med, once known as Smyrna. And that same meridian so precisely from Al Hoceima to the Ivory Coast Abidijan, is exactly 3333km, from beachline to beachline, spooky is an understatement. Of course these flukey measurements and intersections only apply to the site Calvine, so who knows. Ty Simon another great plotting location!!

    Reply
  3. The harrier in the photo with object appears to be RAF GR(number dependent on date), with no radar, whereas the one you showed as image of BAE test aircraft was a Sea Harrier with a radar. Maybe it’s just the wrong image but would be worth checking what type BAE operated?

    Reply
  4. My initial thought if it didn't move much was it might be a lighter than air craft that was shaped like the stealth aircraft with the special coating on it and maybe some metal foil inside representing items which had to be made from radar reflecting elements, to see if it could be seen by radar. The Harriers then would use their radar to see the object. I don't think the weird looking craft is a platform to send a laser beam down to paint a target. Regular aircraft such as helicopters would likely be used to accomplish that.

    Reply
  5. A air towed Stealth drone testing vehicle might well make a lot of sense given stealth tech at the time used faceted designs such as the F-117. The laser targeting device makes less sense, at least as described though. Laser targeting was used in the Vietnam conflict and early laser targeting pods were developed and in service by the early 1970s (AN/AVQ 10 Pave Knife) which were deployed during that war. It doesn't make any sense to use a ground laser to illuminate an airborne object, which uses reflection to target ground location. In any case, even the RAF could deploy sophisticated targeting pods by 1990.

    Reply
  6. Laser reflector? No, just no. Why would you add all that complexity into target designation? I think the first problem you would run into is the bomb would just as likely guide onto the reflector as much as onto the target, that is why there are very strict operational procedures to drop on lased targets, so the bomb does not guide onto the laser source. A JTAC or AFAC work just fine. The rock reflection in a lake still works the best for me.

    Reply
  7. Love your work professor. Main topic of today’s video is on point and the explanation you give is correct. The out of the box! The yellow box. The Kodak company and IBM are the deceased grandfathers of so many secret projects. These two may not have the final thing. But they made the parts or were able to process information. Your information tracks with score of employees who I know of theses companies.

    Reply
  8. that thing seems way bigger than the harrier, if it was also made of solid metal sheets as shown in the photos it would weigh many many tonnes. what plane could tow that heavy a load that also has almost no lift?

    Reply
  9. It is clearly a rock, the trouble is that when you sit and drink with folk's full of their own agenda's they sound so convincing. Stick to the Truth and beware the Siren calls of popularity 🙂

    Reply
  10. They wouldn't dare willingly fly a tow- target so low or over land snd this laser drone tosh is exactly that. Also UK tow targets at the time were flown by 100 sqn Canberra's and being wound down as the squadron was transferring to the Hawk TMk. 1. Our targets were and still are basically giant wind-socks and fabric flags for guns and conventional fixed-wing drones for missiles. None of which are flown inland.

    Reply
  11. Whether it's a 'genuine' UFO or a hoax I'm not sure, but I will say this: I view people who purposefully create hoaxes in a VERY dim light indeed. They're the lowest of the low!

    It's difficult enough as it is to have people take this issue seriously without complete and utter idiots making it even harder by giving the Mick West's of the world even more ammo with which to rubbish the subject.

    Reply

Leave a Comment