Broken piece from Chinese plane crash points to mid-air breakage; What's behind aircraft's nosedive?



Mystery has deepened over what led to the crash of China Eastern flight in which 132 people were killed on March 21. A new finding has suggested that a suspected piece of aircraft was found 10 km away from the main wreckage site. According to the fire-fighting rescue team, the piece is about 1.3 meters long and 10 centimetres wide. Investigators say that if true, the ill-fated jet suffered some kind of mid-air breakup. Watch this video to know more.

#ChinaPlaneCrash #Mystery #Wreckage #Tragedy #SecondBlackBox #Probe

source

20 thoughts on “Broken piece from Chinese plane crash points to mid-air breakage; What's behind aircraft's nosedive?”

  1. It sounds like a wing or tail flap.
    Which could have broken off FROM the steep high-speed dive. And being the shape it is, its very plausible that it would Flutter to the ground. Taking a diagonal path to the ground. Placing it miles behind the crash site.
    It most likely broke off BECAUSE of the dive. As opposed to breaking off and causing the dive.
    And losing one flap WOULD NOT cause a plane to nose dive!
    And it does seem to be a controlled dive. Not an unpowered out of control dive, that would be subject to the force of head winds. Which would flutter the plane, and it would break up partially or fully..
    If it was a mechanical failure. To happen with the speed in which it did, It was one of epic proportions!
    My Prayers are with the families of those who lost their lives! 🙏

    Reply
  2. According to Flight radar 24 data, the aircraft left cruise altitude of 29,100ft (8869m) at 06:20:59z. It was a sudden departure and quickly accelerated to a vertical speed of 30976ft/min. However after 20 seconds, the rate of descent slowed to 16 832 ft/min, before increasing again to 21888ft/min.-Indicating some degree of control. Between 7800 and 7400 ft. altitude the aircraft then stopped descending and climbed rapidly for nearly 15 seconds , before commencing an accelerated near vertical descent to impact at 06:23:35.
    From cruise to impact took approximately 155 seconds.During the rapid descent the aircraft reached speeds of 590 kts. -110 knots greater than design cruise speed of 480 kts/0.789Mach. – There were no emergency announcements and no contact with ATC. No survivors were found , both the Flight data recorder and Cockpit Voice recorder have now been recovered.

    Reply
  3. If the bodies were found basically naked, then it was a mid-air breakup. This would be almost like COPA flt. 201 which also broke up in midair becasue of a mulfuction Gyroscope and pilots to correct the angle shown on the Gyroscope, unknowingly rolled the plane over into a unrecoverable nose dive.

    Reply
  4. Impact of sudden dive. Must break a plane!!
    Keeps repeating in Boeing Crashes
    Its a Nose Dive and End of the world for all passengers and crew
    2*Why do they still need to look for flight recorders when every Boeing plane seems to
    "Catch Pilots off guard whilst flying ,then ends in a Nose dive that crashes to whats below Ocean ,River ,Mountains , Highway or Corn fields
    3* If Boeing planes repeatedly nose dive and kills all passengers how can it be HUMAN ERROR ??
    4, CARS, MOTOBIKES, BUSES AND OTHER FORMS OF LAND TRANSPORTATION that continously surface with the same errors will be labelled as MANUFACTURING ERRORS
    THESE vehicles, these engines are removed from sales showroom s or are delisted models.
    5,Why should aeroplanes have a choice to depend on BLACK BOX TO DECIDE WHAT CAUSED THE CRASH and 99% it is always human error not manufacturing or engineering fault because deadman tell no lies
    6,The Aviation industry must be more Agressive towards Manufacturers and Computer Engineering faults.
    7,Killing Skilled Talented Pilots is not only depleting Intelligence and a brain drain to the industry
    8, Flying hours are good for resumes but PILOTS SKILL AND ability to take control of computerised machine BIRDS gone berserk is of another level
    8,Many other planes of various manufacturers have crashed because of climate conditions or even engine failure and the accidents are never with a "Sterotype Nose Dive Crash with computerised controls giving confusing signals "

    https://youtu.be/67AGK9bYvkE
    https://youtu.be/BV1H0KWsLUE
    https://youtu.be/gbv4-iggzDc
    https://youtu.be/PdYcJldzOdw

    Reply
  5. Note,, Crash picture shows' small puff of smoke just one second before impact . My theory is the jet powered power generator in the tail of the aircraft failed, came apart and jamed the elevator,

    Reply
  6. Of course the brief pulling up after that hell of a plunge caused a structural overload. Look at the altitude profile.
    But that happened only in the last few seconds. That did not CAUSE the plunge.

    Reply
  7. I may be totally wrong, but the sudden up and down profile, recalls me to Egypt Air 990, caused by manual inputs by a relief First Officer, at a cruising altitude, resulting, eventually to a crash. In a fly-by-wire system, the pilot flies/inputs to the computer and the computer flies the aircraft. So with an auto pilot in "on", the computer would not accept sudden-dive instructions. Sad.. and condolences to the families for the bereavement.

    Reply

Leave a Comment