British Marine Reacts To Putin Prepares for WW3 as Russia Deploys Nuclear Armed Warships



British Marine Reacts To Putin Prepares for WW3 as Russia Deploys Nuclear Armed Warships – One full year of fighting has Putin …

source

35 thoughts on “British Marine Reacts To Putin Prepares for WW3 as Russia Deploys Nuclear Armed Warships”

  1. Putin looks like he's definitely going mad in the same way hitler did. Both seemed OK at first but the deeper they both go into an unjustified war the harder it becomes to stop, and they know it. Eventually the guilt of the dead will send them insane. I bet putin is on a cocktail of drugs too.

    Reply
  2. There’s a brothers in arms YouTube video you would like about the Wagner group and Syrians trying to attack an American held oil field in Syria I can’t verify it’s true but check it out Ryan it kind of plays out how you always describe if people wanna tackle the US forces. 😉

    Reply
  3. I've been worried for a while not good I know but hearing this coming from you it's a massive wake up call and a relief because having kids is not easy thank you for easing my mind 🙏

    Reply
  4. Has Russia moved west or did we move east….

    We (US and the rest of the world) Provoked this war. Biden put us in this situation. The Ukraine wants NATO on the Russian border. If Biden and the rest of the world does not want war, then we should have left Ukraine alone and just said "Sorry, the world does not want war. You are on your own." But that is not what we did. Russia is doing exactly what they should do which is protecting their border. They are taking the fight to the Ukraine. This is not our problem, but Biden wants war. We need Trumps idea of peace through strength instead of bidens peace through bombing and billions of dollars.

    Reply
  5. Never underestimate the stupidity of others. Especially a despot, secluded little man that's purged his way to decades of continuous oppression of his own people while solely in the company of "yes men". He starts believing his own fairytales. Sure he's mentally fragile enough to eventually go nuclear if he makes up his mind that he's lost.

    Reply
  6. Well, in the early days of the "special military operation" he said if the west puts weapons in the hands of Ukraine…blah blah, and it has become more and more heavy duty, now tanks and apparently a few Migs from Poland are being sent. After what he has lost so far, not just in terms of military, or the reputation he had that's in tatters and now his own people are not backing him, the oligarchs who are under the thumb of the banks and now an arrest warrant which many say means nothing….but…it means if he goes to any country out of the 150+ that follow the warrant, he will be arrested. I wouldn't be surprised if he is getting cornered, and just like a dog that's cornered he may bite. The question is, if he bites then how hard will it be? Or…will someone give him projectile lead poisoning to the head before that happens? Either by way of a strike force or even by one of his own military leaders?

    Reply
  7. 6:05 excuse me what? No Infographics that's just patently incorrect. The Kirov's are almost completely unarmored just like most modern ships and they are definitely NOT impressing any WW2 era proper battleship which could have armor with effective thicknesses in excess of 500mm+ when taking all the layers of armor, steel quality, and design into consideration. The Kirovs at best have a standard steel hull and kevlar splinter protection similar to the most heavily "protected" modern ships. This would not even offer a token resistance to ballistic fire. Proper armor on warships was abandoned long, long ago.

    The Iowa class, often compared to these battlecruisers for whatever ridiculous reason, for example boasts a mammoth 537mm of effective protection at the belt with what we know. This was split across 9 separate armor plates taking up a system depth of greater than 6m from the first plate to the last. This system specifically is split up between these exact plates 38mm outer armor belt, 328mm effective sloped internal armor belt (310mm plate sloped outboard at 19 degrees), 20mm effective main belt mounting plate (19mm plate sloped outboard at 19 degrees), 25mm splinter bulkhead, 4x 22mm bulkheads (two spaces between these bulkheads were void, aka air filled, while two were water filled), and finally a 38mm citadel bulkhead. For deck protection (depending on location) the Iowa class boasted between 237-275mm of protection across 4-5 separate plates of armor (one of which was thicker depending on where was being considered). These included a 38mm bomb deck, 152mm main armor deck, a 22mm mounting plate the main armor deck was laminated on, and a 25mm splinter deck over the machinery spaces, the 25mm splinter deck was reinforced by an extra 38mm over the ammunition magazines.

    So I don't know what infographics was smoking but Kirov is not armored, let alone armored enough to contend with even WW2 era Light Cruisers let alone Battleships. Modern ships are not armored. A truly armored ship has not been constructed since the end of the 1940s. Infographics continues to make very massive assumptions or flat out errors about some of the most crucial points they make, even if they make some good points this will never stop degrading the validity of their points.

    It would not shrug off Harpoon ASMs (Anti-Ship Missiles), one was sunk months ago by two much much smaller missiles launched from Ukrainian aircraft (Moskva anyone?). The whole point of the Kirov class was to OUTRANGE and to soak up ASMs targeted at them by shooting them DOWN not eating them on their non-existent armor.

    EDIT: Oh wait I forgot to bring up the fact that Moskva (the Kirov Class Battlecruier that was sunk in the Black Sea last year) was sunk by a mere TWO hits from a significantly weaker Anti-Ship Missile. The Neptune ASM carries a 330lb HE-FRAG warhead (useless against actual armor by the way) while the Harpoon uses a 488lb Penetration Blast warhead.

    Reply
  8. Great video. I think that you should view the latest info graphics video:. Something about Russia breaking up into 8 countries.
    It's really interesting looking at how big certain parts of Russia is-both in population as well as GDP.

    Reply
  9. Russia's blunder in Ukraine has showed us that they've perfected their poker face because they have nothing in their hand. I' bet that their nuclear systems are no different. You cannot convince me that a country that cannot properly maintain their 1 aircraft carrier can somehow tske care of its thousands of nuclear weapons.

    Reply
  10. Ryan Forrest, if you’re calling Putin a “lunatic “. What would you say about the heads of US and UK governments???? Ever heard of the needless and unjustified wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, where 2 million plus civilians lost their lives.

    Reply
  11. Putin may or may not be crazy, but I'm sure the command echelon who actually make the decision to launch nuclear weapons are not. I'm sure that they are fully aware that even the country the size of the UK can obliterate all of the major cities in Russia turning the population into a pitiful stone age community scrambling to survive in a dying country. I'm also sure they know that our subs will launch their missiles as soon as the UK is hit and without the direct permission of the government.

    Reply
  12. Don’t rely too heavily on the US to do anything good anytime soon. Our leaders are busy focusing on gender pronouns and race, abortion, etc. Just look what happened in Afghanistan. Biden is an old rotting bag of oatmeal who can kinda read and that’s about it.

    Reply
  13. These are scare tactics, do I think he might be crazy enough to try possibly, but I don't think he wants to take on all the NATO, and the most powerful military on the planet right now being United States, do I think he's a little nuts yes I, but I don't think he would ever get the chance to do that with all of NATO against

    Reply
  14. Should be pointed out that this is what Russia SAYS they have. Much like they said they had a lot of stuff before Ukraine. What they have is a bunch of stuff that doesn't work, isn't accurate or doesn't even exist at all. Can point out that USA faced off against Wagner in February 2018 and it did not go well for Wagner Group. They lost half their troops in the fist few minutes and almost 100% of their equipment. They went back to Russia bitching about how stupid they were for thinking they had a chance. and anyone who simply survived the battle got a medal – Look it up. Oh and the US suffered… I think one guy might have gotten a splinter sitting on a bench. Maybe a bug flew in someone's eye – otherwise Russian supreme mercs were taught a serious lesson. When they mounted up a few months later and the USA called and asked if they were sure they wanted to do that – they high tailed it out of there. Russia's Ships are lucky if they don't sink if a Seagull sh*ts on it.

    Reply

Leave a Comment