Battle Of Kursk: The Last Tank Battle Of Barbarossa | WWII In Numbers | Timeline



The Battle of Kursk was the last major offensive the German army would see on the eastern front in WWII. Despite huge Soviet losses, their ability to replace men with ease, not to mention the power of the feared T-34 tank mean that Kursk became one of the most decisive moments in the war, and in history.

📺 It’s like Netflix for history… Sign up to History Hit, the world’s best history documentary service and get 50% off using the code ‘TIMELINE’ http://bit.ly/3a7ambu

You can find more from us on:

https://www.facebook.com/timelineWH

https://www.instagram.com/timelineWH

This channel is part of the History Hit Network. Any queries, please contact [email protected]

source

29 thoughts on “Battle Of Kursk: The Last Tank Battle Of Barbarossa | WWII In Numbers | Timeline”

  1. After doing some more research I found out that the German army used primarily panzer ll Terrible tank

    Basically, the accepted design was an enlarged Panzer I with a turret bearing the new Rheinmetall KwK30 L55 20 mm (0.79 in) quick firing gun. The armament was derived from the 2 cm FlaK 30 anti-aircraft gun, capable of a firing rate of 600 rpm. The purpose of such a gun was to have good armor-piercing capabilities, due to its high velocity and high rate of fire, being especially effective at short range against most light and medium tanks of the time. The KwK 30 was aimed through a TZF4 gun sight. Normal provision was 180 rounds (armor-piercing and high explosive) and 2250 for the coaxial 7.92 mm (0.31 in) Rheinmetall-Borsig model 34 machine-gun. Elevation/depression for the gun mount was +20/-9.5°. As the Spanish Civil War showed, a dramatic increase in armor was urgently needed, and the first designs incorporated integral 14 mm (0.55 in) homogeneous steel armor (10 mm/0.39 in top and bottom), which was sufficient against shrapnel and bullets. However, it was not immune to many high velocity 37 mm (1.46 in) AT weapons of the time, or the French 25 and 47 mm (0.98-1.85 in) and Soviet 45 mm (1.77 in) towed antitank guns.
    The engine of nearly the entire series was the gasoline 6-cylinder Maybach HL62 TRM providing 140 hp, coupled with a ZF transmission with 6 gears plus reverse. It was reliable, although it limited any major increases in armor and armament, due to significant losses both in speed and range. The first pre-series vehicles were fitted with small wheels sprung in pairs under three bogies, a system very similar to the Panzer I suspension. However, for reliability and mass production, a new system of five individually sprung, larger wheels was chosen. The upper part of the track was supported by three return rollers, increased to four on the production version. The crew-size of three was a progress over the Panzer I, but the commander was also the main gunner, sitting on the turret seat. The driver sat at the front of the vehicle. The loader/radio operator was situated on the floor under the turret, operating a FuG5 USW receiver and 10-watt transmitter. The radio gave a clear advantage to the Panzer II over previous models and foreign opponents.

    Reply
  2. Diesel gels up way before gasoline does! Light a fire under a gasoline powered vehicle and pretty soon you don't have a vehicle anymore. Does no one on thia production team own a diesel auto or truck?

    Reply
  3. It was a mistake to invade Sicily Eisenhower Monty.Blod& guts and the mince meat operation were wrong they should invaded Sardinia &Corsica then N.Italy cuting of tbe germans Hanibal is smiling loking down.

    Reply
  4. Give the Germans half the numbers of men and material that the Russians had at Kursk with Panthers that are operationally ready. And the Germans would have destroyed the Soviets at Kursk. The Russians suck militarily.

    Reply
  5. I enjoyed listening to it, but it's got some errors here and there. To what's already been said in the comments, I add that calling the Shturmovik a dive-bomber is kind-of a stretch. Pilots would nose it over when attacking but not at the angles something like a Ju-87 or Dauntless would go in at.

    Reply
  6. The battle for Anzio was another Allied blunder, after landing on the beach they had almost no resistance instead of moving inland they decided to stop and drink tea,the Germans counter attack and keep the Allies on the beach for weeks, the Germans even brought up their biggest guns"Anzio Annie" 800mm beast…

    Reply
  7. Haha "The Germans are so dug in that it's almost impossible to winkle them out." 😅 "The Germans are so dug in that it's almost impossible to winkle them out."

    X2 ✌😉

    Reply
  8. All German cars , ve,bmw,Mercedes,audi,are like those super tanks, break down constantly, over engineered, expensive, very unreliable … but u aint ready for that conversation yet

    Reply
  9. So many good people died for absolutely nothing, Life is not that priceless after all, it has a price, can be worth pennies or millions depending on the situation, but it dies has a price and is not priceless

    Reply
  10. Like being on a death row, where as soon as you land on that beach you know your life will be over…humanity has reached stupidity’s point of no return

    Reply

Leave a Comment